Step 1:
1) History written ahead of time is proof of God. It also creates the foundation for true prohecy. Which must be viewed by evident historical records and fulfilment.
2) Anthropology Science (study of humanity and social cultures) confirms facts written in the history and manuscripts throughout time.
3) Regarding the Bible;
a) Ancient history supports the Bible's accuracy.
b) The Gospels provide reliable accounts of Jesus as well as countless other documents of the day. There is actually more recorded proof of the life of Christ than that Julius Ceaser ever even exsisted.
c) Archaeology Science backs up Biblical accounts. They are being uncovered each and every year.
d) Textual scholarship confirms the Bible.
e) The Bible is true to it's original form because:
.1)we have such a hugh number of MSS copies, over 24,000.
.2) these copies agree with each other 99.5%.
.3) The Bible's textual integrity is more certain than that of Plato's writtings and Homer's Illad.
f) History written ahead of time is proof the Bible is not a product of man.
g) In contrast, the book of mormon: archaeology has repeatedly failed to substantiate the book's claims of cities, persons,names or places mentioned.
h) From a historical and legal perpective, if enough eyewitnesses are alive when the the facts are published, it's can be fairly well established the vaidity of a secular event. (see 1 Cor 15.6)
i) Anthropology Science (study of humanity and social cultures) confirms the Bible.
Complexity, order and information point to the existence of God. The geological features we see today verify the claim that there was a world-wide flood. The fulfilled prophecies validate the claim that the Bible is the Word of God.
An eternal God is the only plausible idea. If God is eternal, then He was not created. If God doesn't exist, you have a serious infinite regression problem.
Think before claiming there is no proof. There are no valid arguments for the claim that atheism is true, so carefully consider your position. You can be an atheist if you wish, but you have to accept that position in spite of the lack of logic and evidence. That leaves you with no room to criticize beliefs that can be defended with logic and science.
So you are asking me to prove the God I believe (God of the Bible) without the Bible right? and not why I believe in God (as in general)?
Okay according to the "Cosmological Argument", everything that has a beginning has a cause, and therefore created. Science has stated that Universe begun during the Big Bang and therefore it is created.
Time, according to physics also has a beginning, therefore it must have cause, and therefore it is created. So basically we can say, God created these things. And therefore you'd like to conclude, then God must also have been created, right?
But Science cannot prove that God has a beginning, just like you cannot prove God's existence. If you take this statement as invalid, then your statement that says God does not exist will also not be valid.
If you take my statement as maybe valid, then your side of the argument will also be maybe valid, but both of them cannot be true inclusive of each other, right?
Okay. According to the Mathematical Argument,
the chance of the Big Bang x the chance of the 4 dimensions as our dimensions x the chance of our Law of Physics being in place of infinite number of other kinds of Law of Physics x the chance of the Earth being a habitable planet x the chance of intelligent life on this particular planet = 1/1x10^infinity, which if calculated with the limits method will equal to 0.
Therefore, by Mathematics, there is no chance that all these things happens by chance.
Everything has to be in the right conditions to be in working and functioning as it is right now. Therefore, by these two arguments and many others (Do you really want me to elaborate on that?), there must be an intelligent design, that is a god or gods.
Edited for space and time.
