Generosity, it's a Christian thing

The_Herban_Legend

The_Herban_Legend

Well-Known Member
bravedave said:
"I don't get flustered...
But when I do it is generally caused by a know-nothing jackass growing weed in his mommy's basement'
Click to expand...
You answered one out of three questions. Maybe on your second attempt, you will answer them all? Might I add, that growing conditions in "mommy's basement", are stellar.
 
bravedave

bravedave

Well-Known Member
Rrog said:
Goddam you're right! When you look at per capita, Luxembourg wins. Once again the USA is way down on the list
Click to expand...
Of course I am. So define "way down" for us. Then say we only make the comparison between religious people in the U.S. vs the non-religious in Luxembourg. Who comes out on top there? Because that was the farcical point the Puke was sadly attempting.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
bravedave said:
Of course I am. So define "way down" for us. Then say we only make the comparison between religious people in the U.S. vs the non-religious in Luxembourg. Who comes out on top there? Because that was the farcical point the Puke was sadly attempting.
Click to expand...
a church is not a charity though, a church is just a business.

when religious people give to their church, it is not a charitable act.


nice avatar.
 
The_Herban_Legend

The_Herban_Legend

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
just wanted to see if you accepted the findings of NASA, or if you had some super secret conspiracy theory about things.
Click to expand...
The data on both sides, is inconclusive. I am not saying climate change is not directly exacerbated by humans, rather, I am saying that climate change has been occurring long before humans. The left tends to use climate change as a political tool. After all, if Al Gore really believed in "global warming", would he fly around in a private jet? I forgot, it's do as I say, not as I do.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The_Herban_Legend said:
The data on both sides, is inconclusive.
Click to expand...
CO2 stayed between 200 and 300 PPM for 800,000 years. then, in 100 years coinciding with the industrial revolution, it shot up to 400 PPM and temperatures rose 1.5 degrees, wiping out 5000 years of cooling in a mere century.

if humans did not cause that, what did?
 
The_Herban_Legend

The_Herban_Legend

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
CO2 stayed between 200 and 300 PPM for 800,000 years. then, in 100 years coinciding with the industrial revolution, it shot up to 400 PPM and temperatures rose 1.5 degrees, wiping out 5000 years of cooling in a mere century.

if humans did not cause that, what did?
Click to expand...
Let me reiterate my point. I said "I am not saying climate change is not directly exacerbated by humans, rather, I am saying that climate change has been occurring long before humans"

I have a hard time getting around the fact, that several ice ages, blanketing the U.S.A., have come and passed prior to humans. So that tells me, and anyone with common sense, that the underlined cause of climate change is not humans. Humans do exacerbate the problem but there is nothing conclusive, showing humans as the cause.
 
Last edited:
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The_Herban_Legend said:
So that tells me, and anyone with common sense, that the underline cause of climate change is not humans. Humans do exacerbate the problem but there is nothing conclusive, showing humans as the cause.
Click to expand...
lol, underline. retard.

CO2 stayed between 200 and 300 PPM for 800,000 years. then, in 100 years coinciding with the industrial revolution, it shot up to 400 PPM and temperatures rose 1.5 degrees, wiping out 5000 years of cooling in a mere century.

if humans did not cause that, what did?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top