Georgie's reputation may be ready for a rebound

stonedmetalhead1

Well-Known Member
You don't read so good do you?
You don't write so well, do you? The word good is used to modify a noun not a verb.

And you like to go around putting words in people's mouths.
Hmmmmm..... Like you said I hated George Bush?

I've been pretty nice to you and most of these other people in spite of the insults
Except your whole sarcastic remark on how you wouldn't put the time in to do some research to prove a point.

(which don't help your position).
(Which doesn't help your position) I didn't know this was going to turn into a grammar lesson as well as a political discussion. Political discussion, what am I talking about? That would mean you would actually have to put some effort into it and I guess your to stoned for that.

I think most of the readers of these posts can decide for themselves who is the simple minded one.
I'd say they would go with the guys that are too stoned to read or provide any facts to back up their statements.

Let me ask you this. Why do you feel the need to insult me when I've not insulted you?
Refer to your sarcastic post at the bottom.

Is it because you lack confidence? Is it because your mommy didn't give you enough affection? Perhaps your drunk daddy beat you and told you how worthless you are? I'm just a simple minded hick so help me understand why you feel the need to be such a dick.
Thats right, you got me.lol Why don't you actually state some facts to back up your position or answer my questions? Maybe it's because you have no insight or knowledge on the subject so you revert to insults and underhanded remarks.

In spite of how disprespectful you have been to me I'd like to show you that there are no hard feelings and here's a little bit of affection so you don't feel so bad about yourself. :hug:
I was actually trying to have a discussion with actual facts. All that you had were sarcastic remarks and opinions with no facts to back up your position like the one below.

Wow, just, wow! I'm way too stoned to read this incredibly long rant. It's obvious where you stand on the issue.:roll: I understand it's the fashionable thing to bash G Dub. I've never been a trendy guy. I've never owned a pair of jeans that cost more than $30. Never had a $100 pair of sneakers. I've never had a fancy car. I'm a relatively simple guy. I don't go around digging information like this up so I'm having a hard time relating to someone who has the time to do so just to prove a point.:???:

I guess I just don't take politics that seriously and have a relatively visceral interest. My hat's off to you though. You have obviously done a lot of digging and researching a guy who you so obviously hate. I'd never spend that kind of time on something I was passionate about. :shock:
Yo guys have fun and keep on trollin'.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
You don't write so well, do you? The word good is used to modify a noun not a verb.



Hmmmmm..... Like you said I hated George Bush?



Except your whole sarcastic remark on how you wouldn't put the time in to do some research to prove a point.



(Which doesn't help your position) I didn't know this was going to turn into a grammar lesson as well as a political discussion. Political discussion, what am I talking about? That would mean you would actually have to put some effort into it and I guess your to stoned for that.



I'd say they would go with the guys that are too stoned to read or provide any facts to back up their statements.



Refer to your sarcastic post at the bottom.



Thats right, you got me.lol Why don't you actually state some facts to back up your position or answer my questions? Maybe it's because you have no insight or knowledge on the subject so you revert to insults and underhanded remarks.



I was actually trying to have a discussion with actual facts. All that you had were sarcastic remarks and opinions with no facts to back up your position like the one below.



Yo guys have fun and keep on trollin'.
Maybe you should change your name from "stonedmetalhead1" to "wannabeenglishteachingdouche1".:-P

Thanks for the grammar lesson though (not that I give a fuck). BTW, some of your grammar corrections are wrong. Oh the irony.bongsmilie
 

stonedmetalhead1

Well-Known Member
Maybe you should change your name from "stonedmetalhead1" to "wannabeenglishteachingdouche1".:-P

Thanks for the grammar lesson though (not that I give a fuck). BTW, some of your grammar corrections are wrong. Oh the irony.bongsmilie
I was merely pointing out that I was discussing politics whith someone that can't understand simple grammar which you reinforced in this post. Seeing as how there are only two corrections I don't see how some of them can be wrong without all of them being wrong.

1)You don't read so good do you?

The word good is used to modify nouns while the word well is used to modify verbs. However, there is an exception to this simple rule of thumb for using good and well. Good can be used in sentences like “I'm good” or “that bud looks good,” because the verbs involved in these sentences are linking verbs, connecting a subject with information about it.

2)(which don't help your position).

You were right on this one, my apologies you used it in reference to the word insults. I let your post get to me and I didn't read it thoroughly.

At least I can admit when I'm wrong.

I guess I do get fired up over politics but just becasuse it effects all of us so much but to be fair none of this would have started if you wouldn't have taken a jab at me. I'm still waiting to here how the media was too hard on Bush. I never read any post from you backing up this statement.
 

medicineman

New Member
Simple fact: Bush was/is a douche. He was from birth and will be when he dies, (That cannot be too soon for me) He is responsible for somewhere around a million+ deaths, with many more to come from death by cancer due to DU munitions.

Iraqi cancers, birth defects blamed on U.S. depleted uranium
By LARRY JOHNSON
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER FOREIGN DESK EDITOR
SOUTHERN DEMILITARIZED ZONE, Iraq -- On the "Highway of Death," 11 miles north of the Kuwait border, a collection of tanks, armored personnel carriers and other military vehicles are rusting in the desert.
They also are radiating nuclear energy.
Paul Kitagaki Jr. / P-I Six-year-old Fatma Rakwan, being held by her mother at the Basra Hospital for Maternity and Children, was recently diagnosed with leukemia.In 1991, the United States and its Persian Gulf War allies blasted the vehicles with armor-piercing shells made of depleted uranium -- the first time such weapons had been used in warfare -- as the Iraqis retreated from Kuwait. The devastating results gave the highway its name.
Today, nearly 12 years after the use of the super-tough weapons was credited with bringing the war to a swift conclusion, the battlefield remains a radioactive toxic wasteland -- and depleted uranium munitions remain a mystery.
Although the Pentagon has sent mixed signals about the effects of depleted uranium, Iraqi doctors believe that it is responsible for a significant increase in cancer and birth defects in the region. Many researchers outside Iraq, and several U.S. veterans organizations, agree; they also suspect depleted uranium of playing a role in Gulf War Syndrome, the still-unexplained malady that has plagued hundreds of thousands of Gulf War veterans.
Depleted uranium is a problem in other former war zones as well. Yesterday, U.N. experts said they found radioactive hot spots in Bosnia resulting from the use of depleted uranium during NATO air strikes in 1995.
With another war in Iraq perhaps imminent, scientists and others are concerned that the side effects of depleted uranium munitions -- still a major part of the U.S. arsenal -- will cause serious illnesses or deaths in a new generation of U.S. soldiers as well as Iraqis.

THE DANGERS


Depleted uranium, known as DU, is a highly dense metal that is the byproduct of the process during which fissionable uranium used to manufacture nuclear bombs and reactor fuel is separated from natural uranium. DU remains radioactive for about 4.5 billion years.
Uranium, a weakly radioactive element, occurs naturally in soil and water everywhere on Earth, but mainly in trace quantities. Humans ingest it daily in minute quantities.
Paul Kitagaki Jr. / P-I Dr. Khajak Vartaanian, a radiation expert, holds a Geiger counter next to a hole in an Iraqi tank destroyed by depleted uranium weapons in the Persian Gulf War in 1991. The shell holes show 1,000 times the normal background radiation level.

DU shell holes in the vehicles along the Highway of Death are 1,000 times more radioactive than background radiation, according to Geiger counter readings done for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer by Dr. Khajak Vartaanian, a nuclear medicine expert from the Iraq Department of Radiation Protection in Basra, and Col. Amal Kassim of the Iraqi navy.
The desert around the vehicles was 100 times more radioactive than background radiation; Basra, a city of 1 million people, some 125 miles away, registered only slightly above background radiation level.
But the radioactivity is only one concern about DU munitions.
A second, potentially more serious hazard is created when a DU round hits its target. As much as 70 percent of the projectile can burn up on impact, creating a firestorm of ceramic DU oxide particles. The residue of this firestorm is an extremely fine ceramic uranium dust that can be spread by the wind, inhaled and absorbed into the human body and absorbed by plants and animals, becoming part of the food chain.
Once lodged in the soil, the munitions can pollute the environment and create up to a hundredfold increase in uranium levels in ground water, according to the U.N. Environmental Program.







Whether this is ever proven or not, is really not important to the thousands of Iraqi children that come down with cancer. My take is the US military will suppress this and make it a non-issue, sort of like agent orange was for nigh on to thirty years. By that time, the atrocities in Iraq will be old news, except to the Iraqis, who will have done and be doing all the suffering. Maybe when enough US soldiers are diagnosed with leukemia, or some other cancer that can be traced to DU munitions, the real truth will come out. Roast in hell G.W.Bush.
 
Stonedmetalhead is a giant douche. Bush the 2nd was by far one of the greatest presidents we've ever had in this country. All his asministration ever did was try to protect this country. I for one am extremely dissappointed in your lack of patriotism sir. If u don't like this country then why don't you just leave.
 

dukeofbaja

New Member
Stonedmetalhead is a giant douche. Bush the 2nd was by far one of the greatest presidents we've ever had in this country. All his asministration ever did was try to protect this country. I for one am extremely dissappointed in your lack of patriotism sir. If u don't like this country then why don't you just leave.
Some good job he did protecting us....I thought we would NEVER forget
 
All bush ever did was protect our freedoms from terrorists who are jealous of them. I for one have no problem letting my government decide what's best for me since they could olny ever have our best intentions at heart. Why should I care if they tap my phones... I'm not doing anything illegal, ARE YOU?
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
Simple fact: Bush was/is a douche. He was from birth and will be when he dies, (That cannot be too soon for me) He is responsible for somewhere around a million+ deaths, with many more to come from death by cancer due to DU munitions.

Iraqi cancers, birth defects blamed on U.S. depleted uranium
By LARRY JOHNSON
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER FOREIGN DESK EDITOR
SOUTHERN DEMILITARIZED ZONE, Iraq -- On the "Highway of Death," 11 miles north of the Kuwait border, a collection of tanks, armored personnel carriers and other military vehicles are rusting in the desert.
They also are radiating nuclear energy.
Paul Kitagaki Jr. / P-I Six-year-old Fatma Rakwan, being held by her mother at the Basra Hospital for Maternity and Children, was recently diagnosed with leukemia.In 1991, the United States and its Persian Gulf War allies blasted the vehicles with armor-piercing shells made of depleted uranium -- the first time such weapons had been used in warfare -- as the Iraqis retreated from Kuwait. The devastating results gave the highway its name.
Today, nearly 12 years after the use of the super-tough weapons was credited with bringing the war to a swift conclusion, the battlefield remains a radioactive toxic wasteland -- and depleted uranium munitions remain a mystery.
Although the Pentagon has sent mixed signals about the effects of depleted uranium, Iraqi doctors believe that it is responsible for a significant increase in cancer and birth defects in the region. Many researchers outside Iraq, and several U.S. veterans organizations, agree; they also suspect depleted uranium of playing a role in Gulf War Syndrome, the still-unexplained malady that has plagued hundreds of thousands of Gulf War veterans.
Depleted uranium is a problem in other former war zones as well. Yesterday, U.N. experts said they found radioactive hot spots in Bosnia resulting from the use of depleted uranium during NATO air strikes in 1995.
With another war in Iraq perhaps imminent, scientists and others are concerned that the side effects of depleted uranium munitions -- still a major part of the U.S. arsenal -- will cause serious illnesses or deaths in a new generation of U.S. soldiers as well as Iraqis.

THE DANGERS


Depleted uranium, known as DU, is a highly dense metal that is the byproduct of the process during which fissionable uranium used to manufacture nuclear bombs and reactor fuel is separated from natural uranium. DU remains radioactive for about 4.5 billion years.
Uranium, a weakly radioactive element, occurs naturally in soil and water everywhere on Earth, but mainly in trace quantities. Humans ingest it daily in minute quantities.
Paul Kitagaki Jr. / P-I Dr. Khajak Vartaanian, a radiation expert, holds a Geiger counter next to a hole in an Iraqi tank destroyed by depleted uranium weapons in the Persian Gulf War in 1991. The shell holes show 1,000 times the normal background radiation level.

DU shell holes in the vehicles along the Highway of Death are 1,000 times more radioactive than background radiation, according to Geiger counter readings done for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer by Dr. Khajak Vartaanian, a nuclear medicine expert from the Iraq Department of Radiation Protection in Basra, and Col. Amal Kassim of the Iraqi navy.
The desert around the vehicles was 100 times more radioactive than background radiation; Basra, a city of 1 million people, some 125 miles away, registered only slightly above background radiation level.
But the radioactivity is only one concern about DU munitions.
A second, potentially more serious hazard is created when a DU round hits its target. As much as 70 percent of the projectile can burn up on impact, creating a firestorm of ceramic DU oxide particles. The residue of this firestorm is an extremely fine ceramic uranium dust that can be spread by the wind, inhaled and absorbed into the human body and absorbed by plants and animals, becoming part of the food chain.
Once lodged in the soil, the munitions can pollute the environment and create up to a hundredfold increase in uranium levels in ground water, according to the U.N. Environmental Program.







Whether this is ever proven or not, is really not important to the thousands of Iraqi children that come down with cancer. My take is the US military will suppress this and make it a non-issue, sort of like agent orange was for nigh on to thirty years. By that time, the atrocities in Iraq will be old news, except to the Iraqis, who will have done and be doing all the suffering. Maybe when enough US soldiers are diagnosed with leukemia, or some other cancer that can be traced to DU munitions, the real truth will come out. Roast in hell G.W.Bush.
Ummmmmm, you do know that Bush didn't invent DU munitions? Daddy Bush didn't invent them either. Hell neither one of them probably know what they are or authorized the use of them.:-P
 
Top