Health Care “Reform” by Insiders: Media Fails to Report Conflicts of Interest

An interesting article about health care and the influence of big health care corporations on 'academic presentations';

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017...uo-media-fails-report-conflicts-interest.html

Obama Care relies on the use of or threat of offensive force. The onus of explaining why something that uses that means is rational falls to the proponents of it. It is impossible (and self evident) to use offensive force as a primary means to create a "good", since the "bad" means cannot be separated from the result.

In other words Obama Care relies on the suspension of logic. It uses duplicity and requires a person to think that an act which is wrong for person A to do, threaten force, can somehow become right if another person (a smiling government thug) does it. The nature of an act is intrinsic and doesn't change with the identity of the perpetrator.

Fuck Obama Care.

Justin-case said:

Funny, he was elected twice running on the garantee of universal health care.


Fuck you too, Rob.

Click to expand...

How does a majority of people falsely believing in something contradictory on its face change something to not being a contradiction?

There's no need to cast dispersions, simply because your arguments are feeble.

Rob Roy said:

How does a majority of people falsely believing in something contradictory on its face change something to not being a contradiction?

There's no need to cast dispersions, simply because your arguments are feeble.

Click to expand...

You're a walking, talking contradiction.

ttystikk said:

So you're defending the 'right' of a non human entity to make life and death decisions based on its own profit interest?

That's a new low, even for you.

Fuck you, Rob.

Health care is a human right, not a profit maximization opportunity.

Click to expand...

No. I am defending the right of a person to chose how the fruit of their labor is applied, or not.

You are defending the idea that person(s) A has a right to dictate to person(B) and rationalizing the use of offensive force to ensure it.

No person has a right to run another persons life. Your idea shits on that principle.

Justin-case said:

You're a walking, talking contradiction.

Click to expand...

Actually I'm sitting down.


Please point out instances of where you believe I've contradicted myself. I'm eager to learn what you have to teach me.

Rob Roy said:

No. I am defending the right of a person to chose how the fruit of their labor is applied, or not.

You are defending the idea that person(s) A has a right to dictate to person(B) and rationalizing the use of offensive force to ensure it.

No person has a right to run another persons life. Your idea shits on that principle.

Click to expand...

Have you ever helped someone that you did not know, and could never pay you back, just out of the goodness of your heart.

Rob Roy said:

Actually I'm sitting down.


Please point out instances of where you believe I've contradicted myself. I'm eager to learn what you have to teach me.

Click to expand...

Have you ever admitted to being wrong?

Justin-case said:

Have you ever helped someone that you did not know, and could never pay you back, just out of the goodness of your heart.

Click to expand...

Yes, frequently.

Have you ever helped someone by forcing your choices on them ?

Justin-case said:

Have you ever admitted to being wrong?

Click to expand...

It hasn't come up, yet.

Rob Roy said:

Yes, frequently.

Have you ever helped someone by forcing your choices on them ?

Click to expand...

Examples please.....

Justin-case said:

Examples please.....

Click to expand...

Thank you for asking politely, but I'd rather not embarrass you by rubbing my largesse in your face. Unless you like a furry largesse rubbed in your face?

Rob Roy said:

Thank you for asking politely, but I'd rather not embarrass you by rubbing my largesse in your face. Unless you like a furry largesse rubbed in your face?

Click to expand...

That's alright, ID hate to force upon you. But, like I said you're are a walking contradiction.

Justin-case said:

That's alright, like I said you're are a walking contradiction.

Click to expand...

You're confused and seem to have a misunderstanding of the actual meanings of words. That is a common affliction though.

You consider "charity" to be forcing your idea on how another person should use their own property and their own body, which coincidentally is the same actions which occur when theft and slavery happen.

Could you give an example of my contradictory behavior or point of view ?

Also, I'm a little disappointed you didn't respond to my clever double entendre in the previous post. I was funny, dammit!

Slapery it is again...

Get a new tune Rob; you've been debunked, you're fake news.

Rob Roy said:

You're confused and seem to have a misunderstanding of the actual meanings of words.

Click to expand...

were you aware that it is in no way polite or reasonable to hang a sign that says "no blacks allowed", rob?

after you get the shit beat out of you for trying to lure an 11 year old into your rape van, we will be the ones paying all your medical bills for you since you think buying health insurance is slapery.

you're welcome in advance.

Rob Roy said:

Yes, frequently.

Have you ever helped someone by forcing your choices on them ?

Click to expand...

Every once in a while a situation arises where it does, yes. And I'm not talking about the parent/child relationship.

Example: say someone has a crazy sister that is a danger to themselves and others. Having them committed will help a lot of people. Including the sister, who gets put on meds and becomes not a threat to herself or others. It's not always successful, but it is an example that we can both agree has happened.

If some of those mass shooters were committed, it would have helped plenty of people.

Justin-case said:

You're a walking, talking contradiction.

Click to expand...

Jebus, you read his posts?

Antidisestablishmentarian said:

: say someone has a crazy sister that is a danger to themselves and others. Having them committed will help a lot of people. Including the sister, who gets put on meds and becomes not a threat to herself or others. It's not always successful, but it is an example that we can both agree has happened.

.

Click to expand...

sorry about your sister

UncleBuck said:

were you aware that it is in no way polite or reasonable to hang a sign that says "no blacks allowed", rob?

after you get the shit beat out of you for trying to lure an 11 year old into your rape van, we will be the ones paying all your medical bills for you since you think buying health insurance is slapery.

you're welcome in advance, you dumb old bitch.

Click to expand...

Give him some credit...

He starts at 12.