Good greed, Yeah that's a hot one. Hey guys, let's get greedy and take all them peoples money and invest in bad credit swaps, afterall, the government will back us if we fail, yeah it's good greed. Wall street vandals at their best, good greed, right..................
Now that we are framing the issue in terms of the 10th Amendment; I would choose to live in a state where I could be responsible for my own insurance.
We are talking health insurance/care and you are talking privacy.If John was consistent, he'd say that the new health care law should mimic Roe v Wade in its federal application. After all, states shouldn't be involved in passing laws pertaining to the private bodies of individuals (right?). That's the realm of the federal government (right?).
But he's not.
So he can't.
Yeah, but you think a federal public option should be offered, in addition to Medicare and Medicaid. And you think the feds should regulate abortion, not the states. And you think Mike Huckabee is a good guy. And you think the 10th amendment should apply to gay marriage "rights". And...I'm Walter.
You're Donnie.
Shut the fuck up, Donnie.
We all declare for liberty; but in using the same word we do not all mean the same thing. With some the word liberty may mean for each man to do as he pleases with himself, and the product of his labor; while with others, the same word many mean for some men to do as they please with other men, and the product of other men's labor. Here are two, not only different, but incompatible things, called by the same name - liberty. And it follows that each of the things is, by the respective parties, called by two different and incompatible names - liberty and tyranny.
You share Obama's praxis, John. And he, too, was a Constitutional scholar...
...Who never wrote on scholarly paper on the Constitution (or any other subject) appearing in a law journal of any kind.You share Obama's praxis, John. And he, too, was a Constitutional scholar...
Please show me where I said the public option should be offered.Yeah, but you think a federal public option should be offered, in addition to Medicare and Medicaid. And you think the feds should regulate abortion, not the states. And you think Mike Huckabee is a good guy. And you think the 10th amendment should apply to gay marriage "rights". And...
I know, STFU...
So we don't need the community clinics now?
Because you knew him seminally, he's a nice guy? He hates on gays, man! Which makes you an outspoken proponent of gay bashing Republican politicians. Your subjective streak is showing...as always.
The subversive leftist will always hide behind the constitution. What you can't see is the pervert jerking off on it, all the while...
The Constitution says that states shall be allowed to govern themselves without undue interference from Washington DC. You piss on the Constitution with your bastardization of it.
The Constitution states and I quote, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
As long as they are administered by each state and not the Feds, I can live with that approach.So we don't need the community clinics now?
Saying someone is a nice guy makes one a proponent? I agree with him on one issue, the Fair Tax. Yet in your tiny intellect that equates to wholehearted support.
No, the consensus is in.
Your moron is showing.
The right to privacy? Where's that enumerated?The Constitution states and I quote, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
The right to privacy applies to all of us equally, as does the right to equal protection under the law.
There's that pesky 10th Amendment again.
You piss on your own praxis.
As long as they are administered by each state and not the Feds, I can live with that approach.
But even then, where do you get public option from the limited community clinic scenario I described?
Oh yeah, Subjectiveman only sees what he wants to see.
Saying someone is a nice guy makes one a proponent? I agree with him on one issue, the Fair Tax. Yet in your tiny intellect that equates to wholehearted support.
No, the consensus is in.
It's yours.
In general, see the Fourth Amendment.The right to privacy? Where's that enumerated?
If you really need me to spell out for you your Constitutional rights, it might be better if you did not use cannabis.
Nope, it's not in there, John...if for a reasonable purpose, or if they got probable cause, privacy goes out the window. So it's obviously not a "right".
Nope, it's not in there, John. It says nothing about the "right" to privacy.
You?
Better to have smoked oneself stupid, than to have been born dumb, John...You've apparently smoked yourself stupid.
So you are saying, and kindly correct me if I am wrong, that we have no reasonable expectation of privacy as guaranteed by the Constitution?Nope, it's not in there, John...if for a reasonable purpose, or if they got probable cause, privacy goes out the window. So it's obviously not a "right".
Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Nope, it's not in there, John. It says nothing about the "right" to privacy.
Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights. Ratified 7/9/1868. Note History
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
You?
The voice of experience.Better to have smoked oneself stupid, than to have been born dumb, John...
You should take the time to read what I cut and paste before spouting off at the fingers, John. Here it is...
Aside from a smart-assed remark and another cut and paste, you avoided answering my question.
Wrong.
