if both parties split, where would you end up?

who would you vote for if the parties split?

  • social dems led by bernie/warren

  • democrats led by obama/biden

  • republicans led by romney/ryan

  • alt-rght led by trump/pence


Results are only viewable after voting.

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Neither party totally meshes with my belief system. everything is compromise
No, it isn't. Both parties cater to the desires of the plutocracy very well. For instance, the recent banking 'reform' measure passed with bipartisan support and nary a whimper of dissent. Same with expanding the military budget to levels unseen in human history.

The compromise is when We, the American People on the hook for the tab for all this, come to Washington hat in hand, begging for healthcare, social security, living wages or anything else the plutocrats don't support. We're told to go get fucked.

There's your compromise.
 

Sir Napsalot

Well-Known Member
No, it isn't. Both parties cater to the desires of the plutocracy very well. For instance, the recent banking 'reform' measure passed with bipartisan support and nary a whimper of dissent. Same with expanding the military budget to levels unseen in human history.

The compromise is when We, the American People on the hook for the tab for all this, come to Washington hat in hand, begging for healthcare, social security, living wages or anything else the plutocrats don't support. We're told to go get fucked.

There's your compromise.
I'm not sure I like your tone
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure I like your tone
Indeed, I do tend to get a bit snarky when I watch banks use tax deductible dollars to lobby to deregulate themselves, when trillion dollar fighter plane programs get approved without bothering to make sure they actually work- and then be told there's 'no money' for social programs, subsidised day care for hard working parents or universal healthcare.

Nothing personal, you understand.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
No, it isn't. Both parties cater to the desires of the plutocracy very well. For instance, the recent banking 'reform' measure passed with bipartisan support and nary a whimper of dissent. Same with expanding the military budget to levels unseen in human history.

The compromise is when We, the American People on the hook for the tab for all this, come to Washington hat in hand, begging for healthcare, social security, living wages or anything else the plutocrats don't support. We're told to go get fucked.

There's your compromise.
naive
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
i asked schuylaar about why she called jews "lying rats" and "penny pinchers". you joked that they were just "frugal". you even said you were just joking and that jews had a great sense of humor about these sorts of things.

i have screenshots of all of this so you can stop the pathological serial lying already, meth addict
Then POST..
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Pandering is not good enough, and if the Democratic party doesn't take advantage of the Trump backlash with actual progressive policy positions, they'll lose that backlash in 2022 and 2024 and another demagogue could be poised to win again. If Democrats win majorities in 2018, and they fail to pass progressive policies because of their corporate donors, there will be an inevitable backlash, just like there was in 2010 with Obama.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Pandering is not good enough, and if the Democratic party doesn't take advantage of the Trump backlash with actual progressive policy positions, they'll lose that backlash in 2022 and 2024 and another demagogue could be poised to win again. If Democrats win majorities in 2018, and they fail to pass progressive policies because of their corporate donors, there will be an inevitable backlash, just like there was in 2010 with Obama.
the backlash against obama in 2010 was because people thought he went too far with obamacare, not because they didnt think he went far enough

you : politics :: donkey : automotive repair
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
the backlash against obama in 2010 was because people thought he went too far with obamacare, not because they didnt think he went far enough

you : politics :: donkey : automotive repair
100% wrong

The right felt Obama went too far, the left felt betrayed, which is why a significant number of actual progressives abandoned Obama in 2012

Had the Democratic party actually supported universal healthcare, progressives would have come out to vote during the midterms to protect it

85% of Democrats support it, 51% of Republicans support it, 64% of Independents support it
 
Top