Maryland police ready to investigate kavanaugh for rape
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
Buddha2525
Well-Known Member
Unlike you I believe everyone should experience the American dream if you're a citizen, and we have the means to make such a reality happen without partisan bullshit. To me it doesn't matter what you think, that's what makes us all unique. You don't want uniqueness and only those who think your supposed proper way get anything at all. The very moment we don't tow the line you want us punished. So Kek to you!
I thought that was the whole stoner philosophy? We don't bow down and accept what we're told, even to a fellow stoner.
zeddd
Well-Known Member
So Darwin is an idiot because he claims altruism is absent in animals? Can you cite that comment by Darwin?
Who cares what “guy” you are, scientific theories don’t give a toss regarding your feelings about them.
Tell us more about how shit science is.
Buddha2525
Well-Known Member
Darwin was before DNA. He was before epigenenes were discovered and proved Lemarkian inheritance that environment is partially responsible for what becomes of our offspring.
Darwin's theories were interesting for his day, but he is hardly any scientific god. Many breakthroughs have been made since but everyone thinks he's the shit and use him for their anti-religious crusade.
He had no idea what were the mechanisms behind his theories. There were others working just as hard,.such as Gregor Mendel who have nowhere near his level of exposure.
Darwin's only fame comes from his controversy. "I hate God." Ok. Good for you, who the fuck cares. Get over it.
zeddd
Well-Known Member
Do you seriously believe ^ is a convincing argument against the theory, why do you pretend that you are educated?
What are your opinions of Darwin’s theory in relation to minor-trait adaptation? for example.
Buddha2525
Well-Known Member
Minor changes are possible. But no one has proved evolution isn't explaining a computer code working within its parameters. Evolution only shows horizontal change and provides no method for introduction of vertical changes.
Whether it's God or Elon Musk's god in the machine is true doesn't matter. That all this is the result of randomness is a scientism fantasy.
zeddd
Well-Known Member
What does this even mean. Words as mangled as your logic
Buddha2525
Well-Known Member
A bird can have a beak, or a reptile can have a snout, but not both.
A bat can have wings and legs, or a mouse can have hands and feet. But no creature exists that has 3 pairs of limbs allowing for a mythical creature like a griffin with wings, hands, and feet.
The interesting thing is snakes have the dna for legs, humans have the dna for a real tail and in rare instances humans have been born with a real tail.
All these are programs where epigenetic factors enable subroutines or comment them out. Evolution has not once provided evidence of a brand new emergent routine.
Science has also shown viruses evolved from a life form that predates LUCA to a pure self replicating code that activates in a host and is therefore no longer technically "life" anymore but used to be. Some viruses are also bigger than some bacteria called Pandoravirus.
Nothing evolution describes explains how from simple to more complex through randomness occured. That's a lie scientism peddles as fact. But they have bullshit explanation for that Punctuated Equilibrium!
Grandpapy
Well-Known Member
i love linux.
Drowning-Man
Well-Known Member
they are meaningful to some.
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
Looks like 4 now, they also found Mark Judge hiding out in a beach house, why is he hiding lol.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Multiple rape victims are not a partisan illusion, retard
Ripped Farmer
Well-Known Member
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
@Buddha2525 deleted this post to me but I'll reply to it anyway. He said on evening of 6/24 regarding the value of the right to privacy when voting:
I don't get the big deal. If you really want to know what I vote, I'll tell you. And someone who gets mad, I'll ask why they even wanted to know if that's their reaction. No one but me will tell me what to do but me. Don't like it, go fuck yourself. Anyone who's so weak they can have others influence them deserves their fate.
We can't ever have a true socialist society if we constantly distrust others and especially ourselves.
Guilt is fine, which acts as a limiting function so we don't become too self serving and never do an action ever again. Shame has no place and you must get rid of that feeling which serves no purpose but as a primal emotion of self destruction.
What we have here is an example of how anti-democratic the racist right have become. The right to privacy when voting is fundamental to democracy.
I don't get the big deal. If you really want to know what I vote, I'll tell you. And someone who gets mad, I'll ask why they even wanted to know if that's their reaction. No one but me will tell me what to do but me. Don't like it, go fuck yourself. Anyone who's so weak they can have others influence them deserves their fate.
We can't ever have a true socialist society if we constantly distrust others and especially ourselves.
Guilt is fine, which acts as a limiting function so we don't become too self serving and never do an action ever again. Shame has no place and you must get rid of that feeling which serves no purpose but as a primal emotion of self destruction.
What we have here is an example of how anti-democratic the racist right have become. The right to privacy when voting is fundamental to democracy.
Last edited:
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
It sure does sound like right wing authoritarian dogma.
Which alt.right group do you most closely align with? Ok, enough ad hominem attacks on your character.
This constitution you want to write that makes egalitarianism the law. Sounds like you want to rewrite civil rights laws? If not that then how would these laws be written and by whom?
Do you endorse adequate funding for education and the right to access to an excellent education regardless of social or economic standing? How would you do this?
In 2000, there were 280 million guns and today 350 million guns in this country or 25% increase. If more guns are the answer, why hasn't murder rates dropped by 25% in the same timeframe? Heck if gun ownership is the answer why aren't 350 million guns enough to stop muder and crime altogether? Of course these are leading questions. More guns don't make people more safe. The opposite, actually. What objective is guns for everybody intended to satisfy?
Last edited:
Herb & Suds
Well-Known Member
I read that