the politics of fucking little girls: roy moore, the next GOP senator from alabama

will you vote for roy moore, the nazi pedophile?

  • yes, MAGA!

  • no

Results are only viewable after voting.
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
That.

It's the inherit prejudice that party devotion breeds that's the problem; people are inherently prejudice against someone simply for what party they're affiliated with rather than what kind of person they actually are and what they actually stand for.

This is the very thing that our founding father, George Washington, warned us about over two centuries ago. Let's review what he, the only President in our history to NEVER be a member of a political party, and beyond any doubt the single greatest American to ever live, warned us about when he left office:
Click to expand...
George Washington was not the greatest American to ever live. You can't hold that title and be a slave owner. He was a hypocrite with many flaws. I would put Harriet Tubman over George Washington any day of the week

http://all-that-is-interesting.com/george-washington-facts
 
dagwood45431

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
George Washington was not the greatest American to ever live. You can't hold that title and be a slave owner. He was a hypocrite with many flaws. I would put Harriet Tubman over George Washington any day of the week

http://all-that-is-interesting.com/george-washington-facts
Click to expand...
Without question, Tubman wins that one hands down.

The fact that she's a woman takes her out of the running for most of the misogynistic bernbots here.
 
TacoMac

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
George Washington was not the greatest American to ever live. You can't hold that title and be a slave owner. He was a hypocrite with many flaws. I would put Harriet Tubman over George Washington any day of the week

http://all-that-is-interesting.com/george-washington-facts
Click to expand...
Apples and oranges.

Slavery was not an American thing. It was a British thing. As such, the United States inherited it. It's not something WE created.

George Washington actually saw to it that the end of the slave trade was put into the Constitution. If not for him, there would have been no end in sight ever and we may very well have never had the Civil War to begin with and things would still be today as they were before the revolution.

George Washington did EVERYTHING first. Everybody else plays catch up, and to this day, NOBODY has done anywhere near what he did anywhere near as well as he did.

Harriet Tubman was born roughly 30 years after George Washington died having paved the way for her. Her job, relative to his, was easy. She had the luxury of having him on her side, and the law of the Constitution he helped create.

It was George Washington that made that happen. If not for him, she would never have been.
 
Last edited:
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
Apples and oranges.

Slavery was not an American thing. It was a British thing. As such, the United States inherited it. It's not something WE created.

George Washington actually saw to it that the end of the slave trade was put into the Constitution. If not for him, there would have been no end in sight ever and we may very well have never had the Civil War to begin with and things would still be today as they were before the revolution.

George Washington did EVERYTHING first. Everybody else plays catch up, and to this day, NOBODY has done anywhere near what he did anywhere near as well as he did.

Harriet Tubman was born roughly 30 years after George Washington died having paved the way for her. Her job, relative to his, was easy. She had the luxury of having him on her side, and the law of the Constitution he helped create.

It was George Washington that made that happen. If not for him, she would never have been.
Click to expand...
that is the most idiotic pile of drivel i have ever seen. that could have come from sarah palin FFS
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Idiot you pick the party that will do the most for you...
Click to expand...
Should wealthy people choose the Republican party since they will cut their taxes and deregulate industry?

You pick the party that actually represents your interests. Neither the Republican or Democratic establishment represents my interests. The Democratic party definitely represents my interests more than the Republican party, but not because they actually care about the issues I care about. The Democratic party represents my interests more than the Republican party by default. This is not enough for me, or millions of others, to vote for them. This argument is dead before it ever gets off the ground.
londonfog said:
NEWS FUCKING BREAK
BERNIE RAN AS A DEMOCRAT AND VOTES MAJORITY OF THE TIME WITH DEMS.
Click to expand...
Then why do you guys constantly try to make arguments based on Sanders not being a Democrat? Like the argument that Hillary Clinton somehow had a "right" to control the direction of the party through the DNC?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
You literally couldn't make this shit up...

Im gonna wake people up from laughing so hard.

Jerking off to a Yellow power ranger with the paint scraped off?

Holy fuck, I thought you were a sad fucking weirdo before...lol!

EDIT: Yellow ranger was an Asian chick, right? You into that?
Click to expand...
Hey bud, at grandma's house as a kid going through puberty, desperate times call for desperate measures...

You know as well as I do that you jerked off to things as a kid the adult version of yourself might consider questionable or look back and laugh at, like I did with the yellow ranger, especially after discovering it was portrayed as a male in Asia. That will forever be hilarious to me.

The difference is that I truly do not care, not even a little bit, what you, a stranger on the internet, thinks of the things I did that you consider outside the ordinary. If you got off to Santa Clause or Snow White growing up, I don't care, it has no bearing on the arguments you make. It's utterly irrelevant. The only reason I would choose to bring it up would be to distract people from the actual political arguments being made because my arguments failed to make my point.

Dagwood, apparently RIU's self appointed psychotherapist, claimed that the things I'm into sexually show signs of misogyny and abuse without ever explaining why or how. He just stated it, as if it were fact. Even though consent is key to anything tty or I are into sexually. Without verbal, explicit consent, anything sexual is wrong.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
besides locking them in cages or duct taping their assholes open?
Click to expand...
Do we need to have a conversation about the dynamics of sexuality with you, with emphasis on how consent works?

What if a chick wants to lock you in a cage? If you consent to it, would you claim she's somehow misandronistic?

Are you familiar with the dominant/submissive aspect of the appeal to sexuality? If not, your sex life must truly be puritanic garbage. The claims you're making in order to try to highlight that the things I or Tty are into sexually are somehow misogynistic are borne in complete consent. It is not misandronistic if I consent to being locked in a cage, or if I consent to being whipped, or anything I explicitly consent to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top