Why is the US South such a backwards shithole?

T

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Fuck that relative morality bullshit. What people once thought was OK is irrelevant. We know much more about the development of the brain and how children grow into adults. Sex causes very powerful hormones to be released in the brain which affect the the way the brain develops. It also causes the child to become attached to that predator in ways that were meant for him or her to become attached to their partner in life. The child might or might not go on and have normal relationships but the development of the child is affected. That is harm by any measure you want. So, just like many other practices of the past, such as beating the child for punishment, we now know that it is harmful to the child and almost certainly affects them in negative ways for life.

An adult harming a child by having sex with them is wrong and is always wrong regardless of the situation.
Click to expand...
I would wager that in most societies that would tolerate a man sleeping with a 10 year old girl it was in the form of marriage.

I doubt anywhere ever tolerated men just raping 10 year olds.

So your entire reason for why it is wrong today says nothing about the past.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
I would wager that in most societies that would tolerate a man sleeping with a 10 year old girl it was in the form of marriage.

I doubt anywhere ever tolerated men just raping 10 year olds.

So your entire reason for why it is wrong today says nothing about the past.
Click to expand...

Well, except little boys in the middle east but..... ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE... ROFLMAO!!
 
T

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Uhh, I think that cold blooded murder is wrong, so is pedophillia. So that makes me an idiot?
Click to expand...
There are instances where cold blooded murder cab be acceptable.

Ignoring the hypothetical time travel back to Munich 1929 scenario for Hitler...

Killing someone who has and will continue to do harm to others, but isnt right at that time.

Killing someone who is doing something that will result in your harm? Not even if he is directly harming you. Suppose a man who lives up river insists on damming up the river. You need it to irrigate your crops. If he refuses you must kill him.
 
whitebb2727

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
rollitup said:
Next he'll be comparing this to healing people by bleeding with leeches. :lol:

:mrgreen:
Click to expand...
I know its not what you meant but leaches do have a place in modern medicine. The show where the two surgeons fix botched plastic surgeries. I guess its called "botched". They use leaches when tissue and skin grafts start to die.

Its actually pretty cool. The leaches release an enzyme that breaks down blood clots and allows the tissue to heal.

Maggots are used in abscesses sometimes.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
There are instances where cold blooded murder cab be acceptable.

Ignoring the hypothetical time travel back to Munich 1929 scenario for Hitler...

Killing someone who has and will continue to do harm to others, but isnt right at that time.

Killing someone who is doing something that will result in your harm? Not even if he is directly harming you. Suppose a man who lives up river insists on damming up the river. You need it to irrigate your crops. If he refuses you must kill him.
Click to expand...
You are just arguing for the sake of it. You are owned in this string. Cold blooded murder is without pity, emotion or justification. Killing somebody who is doing harm, such as to protect somebody is not that. Then your hypothetical, "what about Hitler? " or to protect water rights is really dumb. This string is hopelessly lost to you and you are just spinning yourself down into the dirt.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
I would wager that in most societies that would tolerate a man sleeping with a 10 year old girl it was in the form of marriage.

I doubt anywhere ever tolerated men just raping 10 year olds.

So your entire reason for why it is wrong today says nothing about the past.
Click to expand...
Fuck that shit. Harm is harm. There is no way to get past the fact that an adult having a sexual relationship with a 10 year old harms the child for life. What you describe regarding marriage in earlier days was justified by ignorance. Go away punk.
 
T

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
You are just arguing for the sake of it. You are owned in this string. Cold blooded murder is without pity, emotion or justification. Killing somebody who is doing harm, such as to protect somebody is not that. Then your hypothetical, "what about Hitler? " or to protect water rights is really dumb. This string is hopelessly lost to you and you are just spinning yourself down into the dirt.
Click to expand...
Cold blooded murder only means it was planned and there was not specific threat in that instant. I don't think it is a legal term. It is just a vernacular phrase.

Look man, killing someone because you're better off with them dead is wrong most of the time. I'm even willing to say I'm not sure you or I could come up with a scenario where a reasonable person would say it was ok. But that does not mean it is absolutely and always wrong. It's a case by case and there exists a chance some unforseen circumstances might be morally sound. Same with sex with tweens.
 
whitebb2727

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
Cold blooded murder only means it was planned and there was not specific threat in that instant. I don't think it is a legal term. It is just a vernacular phrase.

Look man, killing someone because you're better off with them dead is wrong most of the time. I'm even willing to say I'm not sure you or I could come up with a scenario where a reasonable person would say it was ok. But that does not mean it is absolutely and always wrong. It's a case by case and there exists a chance some unforseen circumstances might be morally sound. Same with sex with tweens.
Click to expand...
No. There is no instance that sex with tweens is OK you sick sack of crap.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
Cold blooded murder only means it was planned and there was not specific threat in that instant. I don't think it is a legal term. It is just a vernacular phrase.

Look man, killing someone because you're better off with them dead is wrong most of the time. I'm even willing to say I'm not sure you or I could come up with a scenario where a reasonable person would say it was ok. But that does not mean it is absolutely and always wrong. It's a case by case and there exists a chance some unforseen circumstances might be morally sound. Same with sex with tweens.
Click to expand...
Nope, not going to create a grey area around this. Killing a person without a justification such as in defense of another facing an imminent threat is not a grey area. Black and white. Sociopaths like you are always looking for an out to let them justify their acts. You are wrong about fucking children and now wrong about murder.

Jeez, did I really need to say that? What's wrong with you?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top