The core premise of my argument revolves around legitimacy and verification. Period.
.....that pretty much sums up my feelings on the issue.
you have to pay $13.50 to vote in pennsylvania
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
olylifter420
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
hogwash.
you stated that we allow non-citizens to choose our elected representatives, so i need you to back that assertion.
get to work, show me the evidence little guy.
Grandpapy
Well-Known Member
Isn't he the guy that sold a tanker heating oil to Mass. for next to nothing during a nasty winter when citizens could not afford to heat their homes a few years ago?
olylifter420
Well-Known Member
Get your lazy ass up and do it yourself.
You probably live in a rich part of town.
Us poor folks know what goes on buddy
You probably live in a rich part of town.
Us poor folks know what goes on buddy
olylifter420
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
what's intellectually dishonest here? you need the card to vote, and you need to pay the government a sum of money to obtain the card.
make an intelligent argument already instead of just comparing people to hugo chavez for pointing out the unconstitutionality of the law your party is trying to put in place.
olylifter420
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
now how it works, smarty.
when someone makes an assertion, the burden of proof is on them to show that the assertion of true.
if it worked the way you say it should, then i could go ahead and say that you are a flaming homosexual who slathers himself in vicks vape-o-rub and gets anally penetrated train style by 17 black men every tuesday, and that would be true until you proved otherwise.
so i guess what i'm saying is that olylifter slathers himself in vicks vape-o-rub and gets anally penetrated train style by 17 black men every tuesday. prove me wrong.
canndo
Well-Known Member
SCOTUS has ruled on a single incident in OH I believe. They came to the conclusion that requring voter ID was not an undue burden on the voter. Of course the voting was somewhat along idological lines (who'd have guessed?) within the some of the rulings were figures showing that a rather disproportionate number of people would be prevented from voting due to a variety of issues surrounding the aqusition of that ID.
olylifter420
Well-Known Member
canndo
Well-Known Member
So, it does not matter to you that hundreds of thousands of legitimate voters will be unable to cast their ballots this November.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
our party put into place a law which was ruled as constitutional by the highest court in the land. after that happened, the righties bitched and moaned for weeks about the new "tax".
but this tax, the unconstiutional poll tax, is just fine and dandy with the hypocrites on the right.
the unconstitutional poll tax was put into place by a GOP legislature, signed into law by a GOP governor, and just upheld by an activist GOP judge legislating from the bench.
sorry to burst your bubble of delusion. at least you have next tuesday to look forward to.
Grandpapy
Well-Known Member
olylifter420
Well-Known Member
olylifter420
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
unlikely, as she is sitting right here.
since you have failed to prove that you don't let 17 black men anally penetrate you on tuesday, then it is the case that 17 black men anally penetrate you on tuesday.
i'm only using your standard with regards to burden of proof, so you have no right to complain.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
and yet another righty fails to provide evidence of this epidemic of voter fraud.
how do you defeat a righty?
ask them to premise their assertions with evidence, apparently.