US college professor demands imprisonment for climate-change deniers

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't feel any sincerity coming through. So, pity is a put down. You can't feel empathy?
 
The side that agrees that global warming is occurring and is most likely caused by human activity has a mountain of supporting evidence on its side. Pointing to the little holes in the theory and screaming "AH HA! You see? This small anomaly disproves your entire mountain of evidence!" is a stupid way to argue against a well founded, documented, and explored scientific hypothesis.

It's what pseudo-scientists do.

Bravo.

This is what psedo-people might say. I was talking about General Lee B. Rude.

And AH HA. Speak of the devil and it appears. And the devil always bring the personal scorn to the table. That's why we refer to it is as the devil.
 
I don't feel any sincerity coming through. So, pity is a put down. You can't feel empathy?

like i said, doer.

i PITY anyone who is stupid enough to cite the heartland institute.

if that person continues to cite the heartland institute AFTER it has been demonstrated to them that they get paid to say whatever they are paid to say, then at that point my pity gives way disgust, as it is an insult to intelligence.
 
This is what psedo-people might say. I was talking about General Lee B. Rude.

And AH HA. Speak of the devil and it appears. And the devil always bring the personal scorn to the table. That's why we refer to is as the devil.

do you want to get back to actually debating climate science rather than etiquette, or do you have no ammo left without the heartland institute?
 
do you want to get back to actually debating climate science rather than etiquette, or do you have no ammo left without the heartland institute?
I think we both know he never had any ammo to begin with.

He started telling me that the weather and the climate were the same thing, then started asking me about 'space weather'....
 
This is what psedo-people might say. I was talking about General Lee B. Rude.

And AH HA. Speak of the devil and it appears. And the devil always bring the personal scorn to the table. That's why we refer to it is as the devil.
The devil is a fictional character, but if he's were you get your information regarding weather and climate it would explain a lot with regards to the quality of your posts.


P.S. What is a pseudo-person?
 
I think we both know he never had any ammo to begin with.

He started telling me that the weather and the climate were the same thing, then started asking me about 'space weather'....

AH HA. You think space weather has nothing to do with this.
 
The devil is a fictional character, but if he's were you get your information regarding weather and climate it would explain a lot with regards to the quality of your posts.


This is a cultural figure, that most in the USA, figure is very real, indeed.

But, Semantics, the devil in you is very real, also. The tap dance and scorn, base lying for put downs, etc, you substitute for discussion is your devil, we all see.

Believe it or not, it is a simple a description of the very worse human behavior. So I don't believe in the Devil of Religion. I simply understand how it got there.
 
Explain how solar weather affects climate change, please and thank you.


Oh, wait, I already looked it up and it doesn't seem to be mentioned... hmmmm, strange.... Doer stating things as fact with zero citations or references to support his.... spiel? drivel? verbal diarrhea?

One of the main reasons for this is that the bulk of the solar radiation, which lies mainly in the visible and near infrared parts of the EM spectrum, shows very little change over historical time scales. Most of the variation occurs in the lower and upper parts of the solar spectrum; the radio and X-ray bands. At these wavelengths, the solar radiation can vary by many orders of magnitude. These variations are very noticeable in the ionosphere, but since none of the X-ray radiation in particular, penetrates below about 60 km there is no reason to believe any changes would be noticed in the mesosphere "climate" takes place.

And this regarding the other, high energy rays hitting earth;

Galactic cosmic rays have much higher energies than do solar cosmic rays (protons), and these make it through several atmospheric interactions all the way to the ground, mostly in the form of mu-mesons. This galactic cosmic ray flux is subject to solar influence in the form of heliospheric magnetic fields that can deflect and thus decrease the intensity of the flux. It has been speculated that this variation could cause precipitation variations with cosmic ray interactions providing condensation nuclei ("seeds" for initiating precipitation) in the upper troposphere. Again the evidence is not strong.
 
do you want to get back to actually debating climate science rather than etiquette, or do you have no ammo left without the heartland institute?


I can discuss science. Etiquette is the social rules of society. You don't have either of these necessaries to even talk straight, much less discuss,

You actually think we are having a debate. In Science we only debate with math.

Woops, #3... you also lack math.
 
So space weather does exist.

Weather phenomenon in total, over time is Climate.

Sub-sets are from super-sets.

Woops no math. No wonder it goes over head and you have to go back to insults.
 
So space weather does exist.

Weather phenomenon in total, over time is Climate.

Sub-sets are from super-sets.

Woops no math. No wonder it goes over head and you have to go back to insults.
so many allusions

so little content.....
 
the General does not fall far from the bowl.

his.... spiel? drivel? verbal diarrhea?
I call it like I see it.

Water exists.
The ocean exists.
My tub exists.
The temperature of the ocean affects my tub water.

Doesn't make much sense does it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top