In America today, who has it worse?

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
All things that are owned by a person are a "private club" if they make that their designation. Having to seek permission to assign a definition to something you already own reeks of non ownership, not ownership....stupid.
they still own it.

they even get to say whether they serve the public or only serve who they choose.

no one else can make that designation for them, and they do not have to seek permission. they decide.

Also, when you attempt to assign me racist status, the brilliance of your ignorance approaches Super Nova.
mmmmhmmmmmm.

Is the fact that Obama is mulatto supposed to keep him from being criticized?
Is it possible some people wouldn't want this erm "free healthcare" if it weren't championed by a mulatto and that race has nothing to do with it?
When is it, in your estimation, permissible to disagree with the Mulatto President and not be a racist?
the repeated racial slurs totally smack of not racist.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
What about this guy? Gay or straighth?
how about deviant gender-confused shitty photoshop posted by somebody who thinks "gender" can be altered by surgery, make-up and hormone treatments, yet is curiously homophobic...

perhaps your homosexual fantasies are very powerful, but terribly shameful to you, forcing you to try and convince yourself that the dude you want to fuck is actually a "female" to mollify your homophobia.

it's pretty psychotic, but it's plausible, based on the well established psychoses which you have displayed in so many threads, especially your love of prowling the various "Freeper" websites looking for anything racist to endlessly repeat here.

your hair-trigger sensibilities and eagerness to judge others, especially your frequent use of homophobic slurs is a sure sign of sexual repression and denial.

i'm no shrink but i would wager that you are quite disturbed.
 

MidwesternGro

Well-Known Member
how about deviant gender-confused shitty photoshop posted by somebody who thinks "gender" can be altered by surgery, make-up and hormone treatments, yet is curiously homophobic...

perhaps your homosexual fantasies are very powerful, but terribly shameful to you, forcing you to try and convince yourself that the dude you want to fuck is actually a "female" to mollify your homophobia.

it's pretty psychotic, but it's plausible, based on the well established psychoses which you have displayed in so many threads, especially your love of prowling the various "Freeper" websites looking for anything racist to endlessly repeat here.

your hair-trigger sensibilities and eagerness to judge others, especially your frequent use of homophobic slurs is a sure sign of sexual repression and denial.

i'm no shrink but i would wager that you are quite disturbed.
::smooch smooch::

I'm just bored because I have the day off from my $30 an hour career not stocking shelves. Why are you here?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
nope.

i am all for allowing people like you who prefer not to serve blacks the right to open a private club.

only racists use the term forced integration by the way. the rest call it "desegregation".

I am all for allowing you to own yourself and your property, but not to own / control the body or property of others.

What's your philosophy based on....gerbils?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Oh, I'm sorry. No I do not want to come over to your house and play hide the gerbil, but thanks anyway.
i won't claim victory here.

i'll let you do that for me.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
i won't claim victory here.

i'll let you do that for me.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.
why does the term "forced integration" drive such a huge pinecone up your ass?

it is an accurate chracterization of what happened in the democrat controlled jim crow south.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
why does the term "forced integration" drive such a huge pinecone up your ass?

it is an accurate chracterization of what happened in the democrat controlled jim crow south.
go ahead and google the two terms (forced integration and then desegregation) and tell me what results you get back.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
go ahead and google the two terms (forced integration and then desegregation) and tell me what results you get back.
it's pretty simple to understand.

Desegregation:

noun
1.
the elimination of laws, customs, or practices under which different races, groups, etc., are restricted to specific or separate public facilities, neighborhoods, schools, organizations, or the like.

Integration:

noun
1.
an act or instance of combining into an integral whole.
2.
an act or instance of integrating a racial, religious, or ethnic group.
3.
an act or instance of integrating an organization, place of business, school, etc.

http://dictionary.reference.com/

Desegregation laws eliminated the legal barriers to integration.

but in the democrat run south, Integration did not happen until they were FORCED to do so.

thus, in areas where segregation laws were removed and nobody complained, Integration happened naturally.

in areas that never participated in government sponsored segregation, black clubs operated to the exclusion of white patrons in harlem, black bars made clear that white drinkers should go elsewhere, and various other black only establishments enabled the coloured population to be free from the downpression of The Man, and even allowed them to pretend for a little while that they lived in a black only world (as seen today only on BET and reruns from the WB)

in areas run by the democrats, Integration was resisted violently, particularly by your oft-quoted hero, "The Little Judge" as you so affectionately call him, George Wallace, and thus Integration was FORCED on them.
they, the democrats, made Forced Integration necessary, by their refusal to allow blacks to do as they wished.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
it's pretty simple to understand.

Desegregation:

noun
1.
the elimination of laws, customs, or practices under which different races, groups, etc., are restricted to specific or separate public facilities, neighborhoods, schools, organizations, or the like.

Integration:

noun
1.
an act or instance of combining into an integral whole.
2.
an act or instance of integrating a racial, religious, or ethnic group.
3.
an act or instance of integrating an organization, place of business, school, etc.

http://dictionary.reference.com/

Desegregation laws eliminated the legal barriers to integration.

but in the democrat run south, Integration did not happen until they were FORCED to do so.

thus, in areas where segregation laws were removed and nobody complained, Integration happened naturally.

in areas that never participated in government sponsored segregation, black clubs operated to the exclusion of white patrons in harlem, black bars made clear that white drinkers should go elsewhere, and various other black only establishments enabled the coloured population to be free from the downpression of The Man, and even allowed them to pretend for a little while that they lived in a black only world (as seen today only on BET and reruns from the WB)

in areas run by the democrats, Integration was resisted violently, particularly by your oft-quoted hero, "The Little Judge" as you so affectionately call him, George Wallace, and thus Integration was FORCED on them.
they, the democrats, made Forced Integration necessary, by their refusal to allow blacks to do as they wished.
it's funny that the policies that you rightly accuse democrats (of 60 years ago) of racism for are the same policies you support today.

but you're right, it is pretty simple to understand.

first three links under desegregation: wikipedia, civilrights.org, and dictionary.com

first three links under forced integration: a freeiowan article about the problem with it, a lewrockwell article about the problem with it, and an article from the council of conservative citizens (who i just discovered today are a white nationalist hate group).

racists and white nationalists call it forced integration, the rest of the world that is not racist calls it desegregation.

go ahead and give it a whirl. might want to clear your cache first so you start from a blank slate.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
it's funny that the policies that you rightly accuse democrats (of 60 years ago) of racism for are the same policies you support today.

but you're right, it is pretty simple to understand.

first three links under desegregation: wikipedia, civilrights.org, and dictionary.com

first three links under forced integration: a freeiowan article about the problem with it, a lewrockwell article about the problem with it, and an article from the council of conservative citizens (who i just discovered today are a white nationalist hate group).

racists and white nationalists call it forced integration, the rest of the world that is not racist calls it desegregation.

go ahead and give it a whirl. might want to clear your cache first so you start from a blank slate.
dont care what bullshit you believe.

i made my position clear.

and since you obviously have no idea what i actually believe (despite having explained it to you, at length, many times) you can feel free to continue calling me a racist, white nationalist, or whatever else you wish.

it's still untrue, and bothers me not a bit.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
dont care what bullshit you believe.

i made my position clear.

and since you obviously have no idea what i actually believe (despite having explained it to you, at length, many times) you can feel free to continue calling me a racist, white nationalist, or whatever else you wish.

it's still untrue, and bothers me not a bit.
you're on record opposing civil rights, just like those racist democrats of yesteryear (who are now firmly in the republican party).

you're also on record defending phillipe rushton (headed a white supremacy hate group for a decade), jared taylor (currently heads a white nationalist hate group), bemoaning multiculturalism constantly, talking about how "niggers" are "like that everywhere", defending the pioneer fund, american renaissance, an so much more.

yes, you have indeed made your position clear.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
you're on record opposing civil rights, just like those racist democrats of yesteryear (who are now firmly in the republican party).

you're also on record defending phillipe rushton (headed a white supremacy hate group for a decade), jared taylor (currently heads a white nationalist hate group), bemoaning multiculturalism constantly, talking about how "niggers" are "like that everywhere", defending the pioneer fund, american renaissance, an so much more.

yes, you have indeed made your position clear.
1: i oppose a few of the excesses of "civil rights regulations" and the poverty pimps who use those regualtions to keep their velour tracksuit pockets stuffed with cash, their bodies draped in gold, and their jehri curls well moistened with activator (but im totally not talking about al sharpton, cuz that would be racist...)



2: i quoted a scholarly article by rushton in which he argues for nutritional and educational aid for africa instead of cash payments to the military juntas and warlords.
this drove you batshit crazy, and you have spent 9 months trying to make every argument about rushton.

3: nobody but you and the SPLC thinks jared taylor is a white nationalist, neo-nazi, white separatist, racist, bigot, homophobe, puppy killer and nobody but you keeps dragging him into arguments.

4: i related a conversation with an older black man, which you can freely re-examine at your leisure, which detaiuled HIS VIEW and the view of a large number of older blacks, who see the twatter generation pissing away all the gains they struggled for in favour of spinnin rims, grillz and minstrelsy (google it)

but this is all so complicated and nuanced, you cant get a handle on it, so you squawk "That's Racist!!" and throw a tantrum.

not that your antics arent hilarious, but it does get boring when thats your only routine.
 
Last edited:

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
name a few of these civil rights "excesses".

you've already detailed a few of them, all examples of where you trust your gut racism more than a background check.

you have indeed defended rushton as not racist. that's far beyond citing his ridiculously discredited work, which is not scholarly in any way.

jared taylor himself says he is a white separatist. go check out his website american renaissance if you think he's totally not racist.

you were the one who said that "niggers" (your friend's words) are "like that everywhere" (your words).

don't try to downplay your ugly past. own it.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You guys are at the same point of this argument as you were 4 months ago. Put it to rest.
ladies and gentlemen of the RIU jury, i draw your attention to exhibit A:

So is stealing a truck with a snow plow and plowing kids down on the schools sidewalk when school lets out..it actually sounds much easier than stealing a bunch of guns, busting into a school and shooting kids 1 by 1.


Let ban trucks...No! Ban plows.
the date on this post is DECEMBER THE 26TH OF 2012, over 19 months ago from this day.

*hushed gasps fall over courtroom*

ladies and gentlemen of the RIU jury, the prosecution asks that you convict kelly4 of hypocrisy in the third degree.

i rest my case.
 

kelly4

Well-Known Member
ladies and gentlemen of the RIU jury, i draw your attention to exhibit A:



the date on this post is DECEMBER THE 26TH OF 2012, over 19 months ago from this day.

*hushed gasps fall over courtroom*

ladies and gentlemen of the RIU jury, the prosecution asks that you convict kelly4 of hypocrisy in the third degree.

i rest my case.
Resting on that shit, huh?

I admit that I bring it up every 19 months, or so. You two chase each other round and round, day after day, saying the exact same thing. Every day!

It shouldn't take the jury more than 2 minutes...
 
Top