In America today, who has it worse?

Rob Roy said:

A person that is FORCED to serve another is a slave aren't they?

Click to expand...

not really a slave in the historical perspective. but it's not a good thing.

luckily, no one is ever FORCED to open a business, are they?

no one is ever forced to make that business open to the public, are they?

anyone who opens a business can make it a private club, can't they?

wooops, there goes your retarded slavery comparison that you totally say you are not making.

idiot.

you still haven't answered my questions.

UncleBuck said:

there you go again, comparing the act of being paid to make a sandwich for a black person to the act of being held in bondage and forced to labor for free your entire life while having your family and kids sold away from you.

let's try this again:

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

see question: did denial of service to blacks for decades cause harm via less competition, higher prices, or outright barrier to entry?

HAVE A BLESSED XAY!!!1!!!!1

Click to expand...

Okay it's hypothetical analogy time. You rape a gerbil but only stick in for like a minute before you spew, because you are so excited by gerbil rape you can't hold out any longer. You compelled the gerbil to serve your twisted needs against its will.

Your imaginary friend rapes a gerbil day after day and sells the baby gerbils away. Does the severity of your imaginary friends gerbil rape, mean your raping was acceptable? Why no, no it doesn't Meathead.

Rob Roy said:

Okay it's hypothetical analogy time. You rape a gerbil but only stick in for like a minute before you spew, because you are so excited by gerbil rape you can't hold out any longer. You compelled the gerbil to serve your twisted needs against its will.

Your imaginary friend rapes a gerbil day after day and sells the baby gerbils away. Does the severity of your imaginary friends gerbil rape, mean your raping was acceptable? Why no, no it doesn't Meathead.

Click to expand...

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

UncleBuck said:

not really a slave in the historical perspective. but it's not a good thing.

luckily, no one is ever FORCED to open a business, are they?

no one is ever forced to make that business open to the public, are they?

anyone who opens a business can make it a private club, can't they?

wooops, there goes your retarded slavery comparison that you totally say you are not making.

idiot.

you still haven't answered my questions.

Click to expand...

A person is forced to seek permission if they open a business and they are threatened with force if they decide to run it as if THEY owned it. Oh look your stupidity is revealed...again.

Are you really saying that a person who must have for all practical purposes government permission to run a business is not in some way being compelled to obey an edict by an entity that doesn't own the property? THAT is force, right in front of you.

Rob Roy said:

A person is forced to seek permission if they open a business and they are threatened with force if they decide to run it as if THEY owned it. Oh look your stupidity is revealed...again.

Are you really saying that a person who must have for all practical purposes government permission to run a business is not in some way being compelled to obey an edict by an entity that doesn't own the property? THAT is force, right in front of you.

Click to expand...

no one is forced to open a business or to make it open to the public, thus no one is forced to serve others.

and you are still not answering my questions.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

UncleBuck said:

no one is forced to open a business or to make it open to the public, thus no one is forced to serve others.

and you are still not answering my questions.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

Click to expand...

Tell me about the rabbits Lenny.

Rob Roy said:

Tell me about the rabbits Lenny.

Click to expand...

still not answering my questions about denial of service causing harm.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

UncleBuck said:

no one is forced to open a business or to make it open to the public, thus no one is forced to serve others.

and you are still not answering my questions.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

Click to expand...

So a person that DOES open a business ISN'T under a threat of force to use their body and their property in ways they may not wish to?


I think your nose is longer than your gerbil poker now Meathead.

Red1966 said:

The number of Americans who self identify as homosexuals is like 1.6% Much less than what is commonly thought.

Click to expand...

What about this guy? Gay or straighth?

Rob Roy said:

So a person that DOES open a business ISN'T under a threat of force to use their body and their property in ways they may not wish to?

Click to expand...

not with respect to serving black people, who you have stated you "prefer not to serve" and have to be "coerced" and "forced" to serve.

if, like you, a business owner does not want to serve black people, they can make it a private club.

and you still have not answered my questions.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

UncleBuck said:

still not answering my questions about denial of service causing harm.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

Click to expand...

post 192 this thread....pea brain.

UncleBuck said:

not with respect to serving black people, who you have stated you "prefer not to serve" and have to be "coerced" and "forced" to serve.

if, like you, a business owner does not want to serve black people, they can make it a private club.

and you still have not answered my questions.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

Click to expand...

Now you're making shit up again.

My position is that I, nor you have any right to compel another to serve us....even if it is just a little 2 minute gerbil rape.

So why do you think it is okay to compel people under threat of force to serve others?

Rob Roy said:

post 192 this thread....pea brain.

Click to expand...

nope, you did not answer the question in post 192.

i will ask it again. please answer.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

see question: did denial of service to blacks for decades cause harm via less competition, higher prices, or outright barrier to entry?

HAVE A BLESSED XAY!!!1!!!!1

Rob Roy said:

why do you think it is okay to compel people under threat of force to serve others?

Click to expand...

that scenario does not exist.

no one is ever forced to open a business or make it open to the general public.

if like you, someone wishes to refuse service to black patrons, they are free to open a private club.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

see question: did denial of service to blacks for decades cause harm via less competition, higher prices, or outright barrier to entry?

HAVE A BLESSED XAY!!!1!!!!1

here comes the long winded rationalization from rob about how denial of service totally never caused any harm.

wait for it...

UncleBuck said:

nope, you did not answer the question in post 192.

i will ask it again. please answer.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

see question: did denial of service to blacks for decades cause harm via less competition, higher prices, or outright barrier to entry?

HAVE A BLESSED XAY!!!1!!!!1

Click to expand...

Coercive governments prohibiting people from choosing their associations harmed lots of people, blacks, whites, lots of people.

If a person wants to associate with another that wants to associate with them, that is their right and none of our business.

If a person doesn't want to associate with another the act of forcing them to, to use their body and their justly acquired property as if they did not own it, causes harm.

You are trying to justify the use of force (via forced associations) to right what you perceive is an injustice. However you never address the course of action that you would use (forced association) as if it were harmful. Why is that?

Now why do you like to use force to make people associate? Wouldn't it be best if people interacted on a voluntary and consensual basis? Why yes, it would.

Rob Roy said:

why do you like to use force to make people associate? Wouldn't it be best if people interacted on a voluntary and consensual basis?

Click to expand...

that's the whole point of private clubs. no one is mandated to be open to the public. they get to nteract on their own voluntary and consensual basis that way.

you still never answered the question.




I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

see question: did denial of service to blacks for decades cause harm via less competition, higher prices, or outright barrier to entry?

HAVE A BLESSED XAY!!!1!!!!1

UncleBuck said:

here comes the long winded rationalization from rob about how denial of service totally never caused any harm.

wait for it...

Click to expand...

Your solution to forced segregation is forced integration, including forcing people to use their body and private property to serve others.

Why that's brilliant, you would have made a great Plantation owner or government official.

Rob Roy said:

Your solution to forced segregation is forced integration.

Click to expand...

nope.

i am all for allowing people like you who prefer not to serve blacks the right to open a private club.

only racists use the term forced integration by the way. the rest call it "desegregation".

UncleBuck said:

that's the whole point of private clubs. no one is mandated to be open to the public. they get to nteract on their own voluntary and consensual basis that way.

you still never answered the question.




I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

see question: did denial of service to blacks for decades cause harm via less competition, higher prices, or outright barrier to entry?

HAVE A BLESSED XAY!!!1!!!!1

Click to expand...

All things that are owned by a person are a "private club" if they make that their designation. Having to seek permission to assign a definition to something you already own reeks of non ownership, not ownership....stupid.

Also, when you attempt to assign me racist status, the brilliance of your ignorance approaches Super Nova.

I think it's not up to me or you to tell others how to use their body or their property. You do. Good night shit head.