Economic growth more likely when wealth distributed to poor instead of rich

[Rob Roy]

and still no evidence, just a goebbels style chant.

 

[Red1966]

Economic growth more likely when wealth distributed to poor instead of rich
ergo: less economic g
Common sense eludes you

Increased money spent on hos an blow more likely when wealth distributed to poor instead of rich ergo: less economic growth.
Wishful thinking consumes you.

 

[Rob Roy]

hey pedo, you gonna show us all how to build a house for less than $100 a square foot, or just flap your pedo gums like the dumb old racist you are?

Well, your use of the word pedo is rather rude, but given your history I'll ignore it feces breath.


Yes, the way to lower cost is to increase innovation, allow competition etc. these will occur upon removal of legislative obstacles and protectionism. I could offer more details, but your inability to comprehend anything makes me think I won't.

So why do things cost so much is the question you should be asking?


P.S. - You're dumb. Very dumb.

 

[Red1966]

Wealth distribution isn't "free shit",

Yes, it is.

it's economic gains that workers have earned going to the actual workers themselves to spend and increase economic growth.

No, its profit that goes to those who employ those workers and non workers like yourself.

When 99% of those gains go to 1% of the population, 99% of the population doesn't have the means necessary to facilitate that growth.

When 99% of those gains go to 99% of the population, 99% of the population doesn't have a job

A rich person needs as many pairs of jeans as a poor person, they're not going to buy 300 pairs of jeans just because they're rich.

No, but they build factories and businesses

That excess wealth sits in banks, it doesn't increase economic activity, it doesn't grow the economy, it doesn't build new businesses or hire new employees, and this is bad for everyone, including you.

Banks have very little money. They loan it out so people can buy cars and homes and businesses. Without bank deposits, there is no economy.

 

[UncleBuck]

Yes, the way to lower cost is to increase innovation, allow competition etc.

i have my choice between hundreds of home builders all with lots of innovative techniques.

and none of them can build a house for under $100 a square foot.

I could offer more details

no you can't, you already exhausted the GOP talking points.

So why do things cost so much is the question you should be asking?


P.S. - You're dumb. Very dumb.

go plane me a 2x4x8 for less than $2.74 then.

your pedo gums sure do flap a lot, but you're just writing checks you can't cash.

racist pedo.

 

[nitro harley]

Wealth distribution isn't "free shit", it's economic gains that workers have earned going to the actual workers themselves to spend and increase economic growth. When 99% of those gains go to 1% of the population, 99% of the population doesn't have the means necessary to facilitate that growth. A rich person needs as many pairs of jeans as a poor person, they're not going to buy 300 pairs of jeans just because they're rich. That excess wealth sits in banks, it doesn't increase economic activity, it doesn't grow the economy, it doesn't build new businesses or hire new employees, and this is bad for everyone, including you.

Do you get compensated for posting this crap all day? Yes or No please.

 

[Rob Roy]

i have my choice between hundreds of home builders all with lots of innovative techniques.

and none of them can build a house for under $100 a square foot.



no you can't, you already exhausted the GOP talking points.



go plane me a 2x4x8 for less than $2.74 then.

your pedo gums sure do flap a lot, but you're just writing checks you can't cash.

racist pedo.

False dichotomy.

Presently, you don't have the full effect of what a truly free market would bring to pricing. You are still acting as if the present paradigm, which includes massive regulation, doesn't somehow skew the pricing structure. It does.

Learn about real supply and demand and how regulation skews it. Also. you are still up in the branches flailing about failing to address root causes. Please don't shit on people from up in that tree.

By the way, I am very smug today and you are still a poopy pants dum dum when it comes to real economics.

 

[desert dude]

Capitalism is good.

 

[UncleBuck]

...you don't have the full effect of what a truly free market would bring to pricing...massive regulation... real supply and demand...real economics.

we are two consenting individuals and there is no law against you selling me a 2x4x8.

so go chop down a tree, plane it, and sell me a 2x4x8 for less than $2.74.

show me how the truly free market works, pedo.

 

[UncleBuck]

Capitalism is good.

socialist-capitalism is better, but only according to the people who live under it.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/23/travel/feat-world-happiest-countries-2015/