Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Name some governments that don't violate the last part of your post....
Bring back the draft
- Thread starter ASCIIGHOST
- Start date
Name some governments that don't violate the last part of your post....
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Yes, it is. You are here for attention, hence the spamming.
Yes, it can. In fact Israel has conscription and is one of the most stratified nations in history. Also, please get a dictionary and learn what socialism means, ya dingus.
I do oppose conscription so you got that right. However, I don't support gov't authority.
You seem upset.
ASCIIGHOST
Well-Known Member
Living out some homoeroticism? Please, take your hands and place them on the keyboard, and further create your slave like illusions. You will be dominating one thing. You're keyboard. Does that break your heart? Tell me how it feels. Yes....Yes....
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
No, I always wanted to be a keyboard. Admit it, you always wanted to be someone's bitch.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I don't own any of those, they're not mine.
tomuch
Active Member
Yeah I did misread - but anyway, that's that. Got robbed just some time ago today. Got only 20€! Five guys jumped me, my knuckles on my fists are open until they'll be sewn shut (the damage done) in the morning. Cops said they know the guys since they arrived based on live-cctv feed.
Now my first TOD (toke of the day)
Tomas
heckler73
Well-Known Member
I said there are times when reasons for confiscation are valid, and you are asking me what governments violate that?
YOUR "non-government" violates that by not doing so.
Q.E.D.
NATURAL RIGHTS = DNE
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
No, I said which governments DON'T violate that. I was implying that you could not name a government that doesn't practice INVALID confiscations of some sort.
Also, my "non government" (as you put it) does not violate it. I am not for no governance, I oppose a monopolistic coercion based government which claims domain over people on an involuntary basis. Can you name any governments that are not monopolistic in a given geographical area and that don't use coercion from the get go?
Naturally, I'm right. Har har har.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Actually you do support government authority and approve of it. Don't be ridiculous. Your acceptance of stolen money is done with your full awareness of how the money is gotten by the thief and then redistributed to you. Now go trim that nose Pinocchio.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Let's examine your statement. It may be true you don't "support" government in that they have fewer avenues to extort from you, since you don't work and don't own real estate etc. However that's misleading and only answers one definition of what support is...
You DO support what government does though, since you willingly accept and share in the booty they've clipped from people on an involuntary basis. You're just too lazy to steal the money yourself.
A person who has money forcibly extracted, say for property taxes, under threat of property confiscation is not supporting government anymore than a slave in chains supported picking cotton lest he be beaten or killed. That person is being forcibly extorted from and is a victim placed under duress.
You DO support what government does though, since your existence is abetted by their actions. You want them to steal for you and accept your portion of stolen money readily. You are supportive of their thievery.
Now consider yourself bitch slapped.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
No, that's not misleading, I don't support gov't. You do. You contribute to imperialism financially.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
No, I do not. I am a Sasquatch and live in the forest and do not have any other occupation. What are they gonna tax me on gathering nuts and berries?
I noticed you did not refute the points I made about your acceptance of stolen money as an act of support. It's painfully obvious you could not. I still like you though, you're my favorite of all the know-it- alls.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Then you're just jealous that I am a 100% service connected veteran.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
No, I am not jealous of people that exist off the stolen proceeds of the labor of others. I wish people would not do that or support it.
I think human interactions should be on a voluntary basis. Failing that, people should not associate and simply go about THEIR business. Most governments are systemically involuntary, I reject that as a foundation of anything which purports to do good.
I don't believe you are 100% disabled and think eventually your conscience will set you on the right path. Besides what will you do when the USA defaults and the checks stop coming?
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
But you also think that children have the wherewithal to consent to have sex with adults, so you clearly have cognitive dissonance. Why so jealous of my veteran's benefits?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
No, I think people that have the wherewithal to consent, can consent. I think the younger a person is the less likely they have developed that wherewithal. I do not think wherewithal to consent occurs at the same chronological age for everyone. It happened at a young age for me relative to many people.
You think people that HAVEN'T consented exist to provide you with sustenance. That is evident by your actions.
I'm not jealous of your stolen money. You said you didn't support government, by implication that means you don't support their actions, but clearly you do, you support government actions when it benefits you.
I have high cognition and low dissonance.
You're still my favorite though.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
So you think 13 year old children can consent to have sex with adults, as you have been saying for months, which is why so many people call you a pedophile.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
No, I do not think all of that. I do think I'd have like to have had sex with a certain 18 year old when I was 13. Man, she was pretty hot. How old were you when you gained the wherewithal to consent to sex with an adult? Was it your drill sargeant during boot camp? Did he use lubrication or did you tough it out? Is that why you are "100% disabled" because he was a little too rough?
How old were you when you learned that stealing was wrong ? If you do think it is wrong why do you still seek to benefit from it?
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
So you are now answering that a child of 13 can not consent to have sex with an adult?
@ChesusRice I think RR is ready to recant his months of claims that children can consent to have sex with adults.
Similar threads
