injunction/court case updates

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
i read that they are working on access with no mention of homegrows.
i wouldn't buy into what was said from anyone who isn't official. HC hasn't released anything so unless they have an insider, we're all on speculation.
if they cap us at 6-it's back to court!
Conroy said himself that if his 4 clients don't have atleast what was under the mmar he will go for another injunction. Luckily, the current injunction is until further notice of either Manson or Phelan. ..whoever in acted it. So even after August 24th they don't specifically say the injunction is over it still stands. At that point if Conroy goes for another injunction the previous one will be varied.
 

TheRealDman

Well-Known Member
Conroy said himself that if his 4 clients don't have atleast what was under the mmar he will go for another injunction. Luckily, the current injunction is until further notice of either Manson or Phelan. ..whoever in acted it. So even after August 24th they don't specifically say the injunction is over it still stands. At that point if Conroy goes for another injunction the previous one will be varied.
Yep, Phelan said the injunction stands until he says says otherwise.
 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
Conroy said himself that if his 4 clients don't have atleast what was under the mmar he will go for another injunction. Luckily, the current injunction is until further notice of either Manson or Phelan. ..whoever in acted it. So even after August 24th they don't specifically say the injunction is over it still stands. At that point if Conroy goes for another injunction the previous one will be varied.
if we go back to court i hope they start again and include one more plaintiff that needs changes so we can move gardens and change DG's
 

nsbudca

Well-Known Member
Imd
Your LP is out to fucking lunch. He/she is guessing just like the rest of us, only they really suck at it. HC cannot determine dosage.Period. No judge is going to say a patient can safely grow 1/3 of his required medicine, but must pay LP's for the rest. What would be the societal harm in growing 100% as opposed to 30%. 1-6 plants might be the rule for rec, but it ain't happening for medical.[/QU
I don't think they give a shit what your dose is lol. I think that the plan is more along the lines of "let me grow a few plants so they shut the fuck up." and I honestly feel like 6 is going to be the number.

Just from what I've gathered on here and after speaking to BC, and the lp's are up HC's ass. I feel like their info is probably pretty accurate. I think 6 is what we're looking at. I don't agree with it. But in all practicality. They tried to take grow rights away completely. I don't think it's a far cry for them to allow very low plant counts.
 

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
Imd


I don't think they give a shit what your dose is lol. I think that the plan is more along the lines of "let me grow a few plants so they shut the fuck up." and I honestly feel like 6 is going to be the number.

Just from what I've gathered on here and after speaking to BC, and the lp's are up HC's ass. I feel like their info is probably pretty accurate. I think 6 is what we're looking at. I don't agree with it. But in all practicality. They tried to take grow rights away completely. I don't think it's a far cry for them to allow very low plant counts.
I get barked at alot here for the same prediction. 6 plants. All I hear is "no way, not a chance, how am I sapose to survive on 6 blah blah" all quite valid points but they forget the government brought them down to 0 but 6 is now unrealistic? Come on now...I don't like it as much as the rest but it is what it is.
 

GrowRock

Well-Known Member
I get barked at alot here for the same prediction. 6 plants. All I hear is "no way, not a chance, how am I sapose to survive on 6 blah blah" all quite valid points but they forget the government brought them down to 0 but 6 is now unrealistic? Come on now...I don't like it as much as the rest but it is what it is.
Ya but we have fought them tooth and nail since 2001 and I believe we should continue to fight
 

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
Ya but we have fought them tooth and nail since 2001 and I believe we should continue to fight
I agree and il still support whatever force the mmj can come up with to fight HC.

IMO, if the program is complete shit. Dont sit around bitching about it. Grow illegally and do what you have to do. Ive been med since 08-09 and im fed up with HC and how people get treated. Il take care of me and my family in need. Anybody who cant i feel deeply for.

"Need something done, do it yourself!"
 

CannaReview

Well-Known Member
If it really comes down to it and you can't grow. Get a doctors note/prescription and start to grow. Don't go stupid with numbers. If you do get busted and others too by the time you're court case comes up legalization will be close. This would probably make the judges or crown throw the cases out.Yes its 99% not ideal but...
 
Last edited:

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
I get barked at alot here for the same prediction. 6 plants. All I hear is "no way, not a chance, how am I sapose to survive on 6 blah blah" all quite valid points but they forget the government brought them down to 0 but 6 is now unrealistic? Come on now...I don't like it as much as the rest but it is what it is.
No one forgets the government brought plant counts down to zero, but we all know how successful that was...they were told to try again. A ridiculously small plant limit would still be a barrier to access for some and therefore unconstitutional. That's not to say they won't try, but it will be short-lived when the courts again side with the patients. There probably should be some sort of adjustment for some plant counts, I get by with half of my 49 plant license, but 6 plants would be a joke. I think it still comes down to not allowing HC to determine dosage, and that is effectively what they are doing by limiting plants.
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
depends on how you grow...WAY TO MANY VARIABLES>>>

and

they cant tel you how much medication you need....They dont even believe it is medication so how do they figure they should be allowed to limit it? :lol
They re screwed I tell ya :lol:
They're squirming....after all the BS they have put the sick though.
 

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
No one forgets the government brought plant counts down to zero, but we all know how successful that was...they were told to try again. A ridiculously small plant limit would still be a barrier to access for some and therefore unconstitutional. That's not to say they won't try, but it will be short-lived when the courts again side with the patients. There probably should be some sort of adjustment for some plant counts, I get by with half of my 49 plant license, but 6 plants would be a joke. I think it still comes down to not allowing HC to determine dosage, and that is effectively what they are doing by limiting plants.
We have to remember its an authorization and not a prescription. I agree i can deal with my last plant count but i dont feel it will happen, this is a time i hope im wrong. if the past has taught us anything its HC can change rules in an afternoon and it takes us 4years to get a result. I dont doubt they have there ducks in a row on how to fuck us. In times like these we need to rely on our attorneys to get us a fair shake.
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
I get barked at alot here for the same prediction. 6 plants. All I hear is "no way, not a chance, how am I sapose to survive on 6 blah blah" all quite valid points but they forget the government brought them down to 0 but 6 is now unrealistic? Come on now...I don't like it as much as the rest but it is what it is.
nope...its completely unrealistic...no matter what you think.. (:

and


IT CANT BE DONE TO ANYONE WHO HAS HEALTH ISSUES!!! WHY YOU ASK?
SIMPLE.....NOT ENOUGH MEDICATION! and DEATH to follow that....

simple enough?

if you thnk they wont balk on that point? ...well....bongsmilie


cheers!
 

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
nope...its completely unrealistic...no matter what you think.. (:

and


IT CANT BE DONE TO ANYONE WHO HAS HEALTH ISSUES!!! WHY YOU ASK?
SIMPLE.....NOT ENOUGH MEDICATION! and DEATH to follow that....

simple enough?

if you thnk they wont balk on that point? ...well....bongsmilie


cheers!
Your right. They will treat you like gold.
 
Top