shimbob
Well-Known Member
*chuckle* Credible source...According to David Brooks,
*chuckle* Credible source...According to David Brooks,
unregulated free markets are a bad thing for everybody but the 1%.You say neoliberal like it's a bad thing.
*scratching head* neoliberalism wants unregulated free markets? I thought they were for socialism, communism, nationalizing the free market? Does the neoliberals' desire for unregulated free markets differ than the conservative/neocon's desire to have unregulated free markets?unregulated free markets are a bad thing for everybody but the 1%.
You one of many who comes here with their own definitions for a word. You are entitled to do so but you will be wrong if you think that neoliberal means communism. LOL*scratching head* neoliberalism wants unregulated free markets? I thought they were for socialism, communism, nationalizing the free market? Does the neoliberals' desire for unregulated free markets differ than the conservative/neocon's desire to have unregulated free markets?
LOL[delete]
Life's too short to deal with stupid shit.
I don't know. I don't much care for Republicans wherein both of those religious convictions reside. I simply point out your false claim that Democrats are neo-liberal communists. (snicker)Oh fine, one last bite
Does the neoliberals' desire for unregulated free markets differ than the conservative/neocon's desire to have unregulated free markets?
I don't speak jibber jabber and so I have no idea what you are referring to.You sure protest a lot for someone who doesn't care.
+repYou sure protest a lot for someone who doesn't care.
you're back?Shit thread.
It doesn't.Oh fine, one last bite
Does the neoliberals' desire for unregulated free markets differ than the conservative/neocon's desire to have unregulated free markets?
I think your definition of neoliberal needs to be shared. Explain what you think Neoliberals are.2? 5? 10? 130? 200?
If you are talking about laissez-faire economic liberalism, there are no true neoliberals in the Democratic party leadership."Neoliberalism or neo-liberalism refers primarily to the 20th-century resurgence of 19th-century ideas associated with laissez-faire economic liberalism. Those ideas include economic liberalization policies such as privatization, austerity, deregulation, free trade and reductions in government spending in order to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society. These market-based ideas and the policies they inspired constitute a paradigm shift away from the post-war Keynesian consensus which lasted from 1945 to 1980."
"During the 1990s, the Clinton administration also embraced neoliberalism by supporting the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), continuing the deregulation of the financial sector through passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act and the repeal of the Glass–Steagall Act and implementing cuts to the welfare state through passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act. The neoliberalism of the Clinton administration differs from that of Reagan as the Clinton administration purged neoliberalism of neoconservative positions on militarism, family values, opposition to multiculturalism and neglect of ecological issues. Writing in New York, journalist Jonathan Chait disputed accusations that the Democratic Party had been hijacked by neoliberals, saying that its policies have largely stayed the same since the New Deal. Instead, Chait suggested this came from arguments that presented a false dichotomy between free market economics and socialism, ignoring mixed economies. Historian Walter Scheidel says that both parties shifted to promote free market capitalism in the 1970s, with the Democratic Party being "instrumental in implementing financial deregulation in the 1990s"."
Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are both 3rd wave, neoliberal Democrats, as is Hillary ClintonIf you are talking about laissez-faire economic liberalism, there are no true neoliberals in the Democratic party leadership.