Does government have the "authority" to force mandatory vaccinations on unwilling individuals ? Where does that authority come from ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gond00s

Well-Known Member
Look into Vermin Supreme. He has a "mandatory tooth brushing program" you might like. His platform has something for everyone, which is why a broad spectrum of people support him !!!

View attachment 4525116
everyone has their one beliefs mine in this at least I don't wanna have rotted teeth so idk when i was a kid had really bad teeth learned my lesson I brush three times a day. people don't wanna let them idc simple as that let their insurance pay for their teeth lol but I do want that state mandated pony tho. ill vote for him better than the supreme leader we have now that u voted for
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Your sauce is so weak.
Your avoidance of the question is an indication you probably think a non vaccinated person is a murderer, while also holding the contradictory position that a person who forcibly injects another person which causes them to die should be exempt from being called a murderer.

Why is that so ? Are you confused?
 

Kassiopeija

Well-Known Member
If my "forcible injection theory is a joke, are you saying you're fine with removal of consent as a necessary ingredient when it comes to putting things into other persons bodies? (You won't answer this most likely)
so this is why you're so obsessive over this point: you seem to want to construct an association between forced vaccinations & rape. Why do you do this?
It has nothing to do with one another... and since you want to know so much of legal terms - question the motiv of the perpetrator...
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Sure, and I think they are handling it quite well.
Are you willing to use a gun in an offensive force manner to take away a gun from a neutral non offensive force using person in order to "save people from others who would use guns irresponsibly" ?

Won't you have to use guns to round up all the people that don't want to be forcibly injected ?
 

Horselover fat

Well-Known Member
Your avoidance of the question is an indication you probably think a non vaccinated person is a murderer, while also holding the contradictory position that a person who forcibly injects another person which causes them to die should be exempt from being called a murderer.

Why is that so ? Are you confused?
I avoided answering your question, because I thought it's either a weak attempt at trolling or just a proof of stupidity, and I'd rather accuse someone of trolling than of being stupid.

But sure I can answer the question: sure, because why not?
 

Gond00s

Well-Known Member
Are you willing to use a gun in an offensive force manner to take away a gun from a neutral non offensive force using person in order to "save people from others who would use guns irresponsibly" ?

Won't you have to use guns to round up all the people that don't want to be forcibly injected ?
guns should be only used in self protection aka should NEVER leave your gun safe only time I can see transporting a gun is to a range thats it. if your flaunting it around u shouldn't have one and u should be thrown in county jail. just shows the point of people being stupid with dangerous tools we had a parent do that and killed their child what a fucking moron....
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
so this is why you're so obsessive over this point: you seem to want to construct an association between forced vaccinations & rape. Why do you do this?
It has nothing to do with one another... and since you want to know so much of legal terms - question the motiv of the perpetrator...
Forcible invasion of another unwilling persons body is okay with you then ?

I do question the motive of "the perpetrator" when the potential perpetrator is claiming to have a nonexistent right.

If you vote to invade another persons body via forcible injection and the person dies as a result of it, are you willing to stand trial for murder ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I avoided answering your question, because I thought it's either a weak attempt at trolling or just a proof of stupidity, and I'd rather accuse someone of trolling than of being stupid.

But sure I can answer the question: sure, because why not?
It's possible you could be stupid and trolling though.

Which question does your "sure why not" answer pertain to ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
guns should be only used in self protection aka should NEVER leave your gun safe only time I can see transporting a gun is to a range thats it. if your flaunting it around u shouldn't have one and u should be thrown in county jail. just shows the point of people being stupid with dangerous tools we had a parent do that and killed their child what a fucking moron....
So if you owned a gun and kept it for protection purposes, you would be in the right keeping it.... if somebody ordered you to give it to them and if that somebody you didn't give it to said they'd use guns to make you ?
 

Gond00s

Well-Known Member
So if you owned a gun and kept it for protection purposes, you would be in the right keeping it.... if somebody ordered you to give it to them and if that somebody you didn't give it to said they'd use guns to make you ?
my view on this is if their trying to force to take your guns and your a responsible human and if they were threatening u with a weapon I would bolt and get my gun and shoot the fucker hes not good for the community. but if its cops trying to take it I would tell them to kiss it second amendment is here for a reason
 

Kassiopeija

Well-Known Member
So burn parents of fat kids at the stake then? Got it.
no take their food away - fat kids is due to eating habbits
No, murder is with malicious intent. I kill you for your money.
The guy thats force-vaccinating you has a good intent. So thats why he doesnt have to go to court.

just like people that drive cars dont have to go be convicted for murder because they cause cancer... see?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
my view on this is if their trying to force to take your guns and your a responsible human and if they were threatening u with a weapon I would bolt and get my gun and shoot the fucker hes not good for the community. but if its cops trying to take it I would tell them to kiss it second amendment is here for a reason
What if there were a semi-automatic "assault vaccine" injector "they" were going to use to go around and shoot up unwilling children and black men in Alabama with ? Would you want some erm "sensible laws" against that ?

Would you use guns to make sure nobody used scary guns and "rapid fire assault vaccine" guns ?
 

Horselover fat

Well-Known Member
It's possible you could be stupid and trolling though.
Yeah, obviously, you really have no way of knowing. I'm fairly sure I'm not dumb and while I may have been trolling for reactions, I stand by every word in my original post and they are my honest opinions.

"Yes. Vaccination against communicable diseases should be mandatory. Or rather a person who doesn't vaccinate should be excluded from society. Who gave you the right to infect others? If you don't act responsibly towards others they have no responsibility towards you

Please feel free to choose a different society to live in."

Which question does your "sure why not" answer pertain to ?
About standing on trial for murder if somebody had an adverse reaction to vaccination.
 

Gond00s

Well-Known Member
What if there were a semi-automatic "assault vaccine" injector "they" were going to use to go around and shoot up unwilling children and black men in Alabama with ? Would you want some erm "sensible laws" against that ?

Would you use guns to make sure nobody used scary guns and "rapid fire assault vaccine" guns ?
umm not evening going to answer this. just because how far off u went from guns and vaccines
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
no take their food away - fat kids is due to eating habbits

No, murder is with malicious intent. I kill you for your money.
The guy thats force-vaccinating you has a good intent. So thats why he doesnt have to go to court.

just like people that drive cars dont have to go be convicted for murder because they cause cancer... see?

Oh so THAT'S why Aqualung is bad, because he "eyes little girls with bad intent" ?

If he just eyed them with "good intentions" his forcibly injecting them would be okay then ?

1586183659077.png
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Yeah, obviously, you really have no way of knowing. I'm fairly sure I'm not dumb and while I may have been trolling for reactions, I stand by every word in my original post and they are my honest opinions.

"Yes. Vaccination against communicable diseases should be mandatory. Or rather a person who doesn't vaccinate should be excluded from society. Who gave you the right to infect others? If you don't act responsibly towards others they have no responsibility towards you

Please feel free to choose a different society to live in."



About standing on trial for murder if somebody had an adverse reaction to vaccination.
Thank you for clarifying your absurd position a little bit.

So if you vote and your elected person murders people (war) are you willing to stand trial as an accomplice to murder? Should murderers and those that enable them be excluded from society ?
 

Kassiopeija

Well-Known Member
Thank you for clarifying your absurd position a little bit.

So if you vote and your elected person murders people (war) are you willing to stand trial as an accomplice to murder? Should murderers and those that enable them be excluded from society ?
should the insane not better be included into a rubberchamber? :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top