I agree 100 percent that cutting leaves reduces transpiration. I just cannot definitively say that it is anymore effective than cutting an entire leaf. It also seems that unless the environment is extremely inoptimal decreased transpiration isn't required. The one thing I haven't pinned down is if damaging leaves partially induces faster root development through some type of damage response. I haven't written this specifically off as pseudoscience but the reasoning behind it seems to be largely undeveloped in the majority of the community which could be fixed. If we do something we should know why we do it.
Also I don't understand the relevance of the point on cutting at 45. That's a whole different ball game to what I'm talking about.
You put the clones in a close to 100% humidity enviroment for the same reasons, close stomata.
Theirs also links to fan growth and auxin/cytokin production which would happen once the plant no longer has viable leaves to photosythesis
Theirs bro science...like flushing thens theirs natural biological process we can utilize to illicit a specific response. In the case of flushing actually allowing a plant to finish...versus lechate to finish
I cut , i produced many identical crops cuts as a result. I'll go with the 17k plants i produced last year with some plant science anyday as empirical suggested proof...