WTF!!!

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Trump sent sick patients into nursing homes?
Trumpers ain't big on facts, just emotion and there will be plenty of that as the death toll rises, death of a close relative or friend sets a feller to thinking about core issues, it opens up people's eyes and helps them to see the bigger picture. Donald does not introspect and he hates people who do, he doesn't like it when you do either, people have had a lot of down time to think, worry, watch the news and get informed, bad news for Donald and the GOP.
 

Puff_Dragon

Well-Known Member
As an outsider (UK - 51st state - and when it comes to retarded, we can hang with the best). I must commend all sides in this debate on Rollup forums.
I mean, you all will go 'hammer and tongs' at it ..but, I get the feeling that most of you (if confronted by one another in real life) would just end up having a joint together and laughing about the stupidity of life. Which, is a good thing.

As for the political debate itself, about the current Commander in Chef. I'm just still wrapping my head around the hilarious way the 2016 election all played out.
If I'm figuring it correctly:
a person who always aligned himself with the Democrats, was supported by the Democrats, always ran as a Democrat, supported Democratic campaigns (like the Clintons) throughout his life and aligned himself (and gained awards from) various communities in the US. When he was then denied a Democratic ticket for the 2016 election went,
"ok .." and immediately turned to the Republicans.
"So, have you guys got a spare ticket?"
Laughing (because they viewed him as an idiot and a joke) the Republicans went "sure, take this ticket" *giggle giggle what can he do*.

Then, with some added help of a spectacularly bad campaign by Hillary and her treatment of other Democratic candidates like ol' JoeB (and some terrible coverage by the media) Donald gets elected with a low number of votes due to overall lower turnout. I believe, he got less votes then the number of votes the last Republican who ran against Barrack got! (as for Hillary's vote numbers *ouch*)

So, then the Republicans were like "What the F ..he WON!?!?" (and you know good Republicans hate swearing ;)
While the Democrats, seemed to lose their collective 'shit' (so to speak)
So you had 'basically' a Democratic runner, who became President and the head of the Republican Party (as a Democrat ..I have to just say that again *lol*). And so, he is hated by the Republican Party and reviled by the Democratic Party. And, if you remove Donald, the guy who replaces him (vice president) ..thinks the Earth is less than 5000 years old!
In the past, us Brits might have called this situation a bit of a 'sticky wicket' ;-)


Forget the rest, this election conundrum alone fascinates me. In keeping with the divine comedy it is.
I know they will teach it in books in generations to come. Which ..I'm sure Donald will love (any publicity Is good publicity after all :)

Peace.
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
As an outsider (UK - 51st state - and when it comes to retarded, we can hang with the best). I must commend all sides in this debate on Rollup forums.
I mean, you all will go 'hammer and tongs' at it ..but, I get the feeling that most of you (if confronted by one another in real life) would just end up having a joint together and laughing about the stupidity of life. Which, is a good thing.

As for the political debate itself, about the current Commander in Chef. I'm just still wrapping my head around the hilarious way the 2016 election all played out.
If I'm figuring it correctly:
a person who always aligned himself with the Democrats, was supported by the Democrats, always ran as a Democrat, supported Democratic campaigns (like the Clintons) throughout his life and aligned himself (and gained awards from) various communities in the US. When he was then denied a Democratic ticket for the 2016 election went,
"ok .." and immediately turned to the Republicans.
"So, have you guys got a spare ticket?"
Laughing (because they viewed him as an idiot and a joke) the Republicans went "sure, take this ticket" *giggle giggle what can he do*.

Then, with some added help of a spectacularly bad campaign by Hillary and her treatment of other Democratic candidates like ol' JoeB (and some terrible coverage by the media) Donald gets elected with a low number of votes due to overall lower turnout. I believe, he got less votes then the number of votes the last Republican who ran against Barrack got! (as for Hillary's vote numbers *ouch*)

So, then the Republicans were like "What the F ..he WON!?!?" (and you know good Republicans hate swearing ;)
So you had 'basically' a Democratic runner, who became President and the head of the Republican Party (as a Democrat ..I have to just say that again *lol*). And so, he is hated by the Republican Party and reviled by the Democratic Party. And, if you remove Donald, the guy who replaces him (vice president) ..thinks the Earth is less than 5000 years old!
In the past, us Brits might have called this situation a bit of a 'sticky wicket' ;-)


Forget the rest, this election conundrum alone fascinates me. In keeping with the divine comedy it is.
I know they will teach it in books in generations to come. Which ..I'm sure Donald will love (any publicity Is good publicity after all :)

Peace.
He wasn't the democratic nominee ,just a supporter who donated money to rub elbows, the field was far too smart and talented for him there. He realised after Obama was elected and saw the rise of the tea party and birtherism, where his path lay. He was a natural con man and the republican party, as a reaction to Obama completely filled with racist scum and drove the good folks out. With Trump it was love at first sight as he promulgated the birther lie with glee. He was intensely jealous of Obama a regular middle class guy who was everything Donald was not, but tried to fake. Donald swept the GOP base off their feet, for the were base deplorable people and they fell in love, Donald blew the dog whistle of racism and bigotry into a bullhorn and they were enthralled, literally. Seduced by what they wanted to hear, the weak minded fell prey to the farce that Donald employed like a Star wars Sith Lord, drawing them ever further down the path to perdition. Donald is a Machiavellian moron and is socially and emotionally retarded, a no nothing with a talent for low cunning and corrupting others, other than that, he wouldn't know his own arse from a hot rock.
 

topcat

Well-Known Member
WTF? Does his makeup irritate the area around his eyes? It's so obvious that he's losing red blood cells. Oh, and just try to follow a written transcript of what he says. I double dog dare ya'.
Edit:"a fact check, fact check, f-a-c-t, fact check". A caveman could do better.
 
Last edited:

topcat

Well-Known Member
As an outsider (UK - 51st state - and when it comes to retarded, we can hang with the best). I must commend all sides in this debate on Rollup forums.
I mean, you all will go 'hammer and tongs' at it ..but, I get the feeling that most of you (if confronted by one another in real life) would just end up having a joint together and laughing about the stupidity of life. Which, is a good thing.

As for the political debate itself, about the current Commander in Chef. I'm just still wrapping my head around the hilarious way the 2016 election all played out.
If I'm figuring it correctly:
a person who always aligned himself with the Democrats, was supported by the Democrats, always ran as a Democrat, supported Democratic campaigns (like the Clintons) throughout his life and aligned himself (and gained awards from) various communities in the US. When he was then denied a Democratic ticket for the 2016 election went,
"ok .." and immediately turned to the Republicans.
"So, have you guys got a spare ticket?"
Laughing (because they viewed him as an idiot and a joke) the Republicans went "sure, take this ticket" *giggle giggle what can he do*.

Then, with some added help of a spectacularly bad campaign by Hillary and her treatment of other Democratic candidates like ol' JoeB (and some terrible coverage by the media) Donald gets elected with a low number of votes due to overall lower turnout. I believe, he got less votes then the number of votes the last Republican who ran against Barrack got! (as for Hillary's vote numbers *ouch*)

So, then the Republicans were like "What the F ..he WON!?!?" (and you know good Republicans hate swearing ;)
So you had 'basically' a Democratic runner, who became President and the head of the Republican Party (as a Democrat ..I have to just say that again *lol*). And so, he is hated by the Republican Party and reviled by the Democratic Party. And, if you remove Donald, the guy who replaces him (vice president) ..thinks the Earth is less than 5000 years old!
In the past, us Brits might have called this situation a bit of a 'sticky wicket' ;-)


Forget the rest, this election conundrum alone fascinates me. In keeping with the divine comedy it is.
I know they will teach it in books in generations to come. Which ..I'm sure Donald will love (any publicity Is good publicity after all :)

Peace.
Da Donohdt don't do books, brit. But, you knew that, correct?
Edit: Puerto Rico is the 51st State. Then there is D.C. This country revolted from yours.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
I mean, you all will go 'hammer and tongs' at it ..but, I get the feeling that most of you (if confronted by one another in real life) would just end up having a joint together and laughing about the stupidity of life. Which, is a good thing.
Most of these MAGA people are racist traitors, or might as well be, America is really fighting for its soul in civil war two, the grey has become red and the Russians are helping too (just like with Brexit). The parties have switched sides paradoxically, but blue remains the color of the patriots and decent people, the choice is stark, it is between good and evil, plain and simple, survival vs death, put another way. Viruses and masks have replaced bullets and bayonets this time around, red vs blue, because all some people care about is black and white, people that is. The result in the end will be much the same carnage on both sides with a similar body count to the first time around, if Trump gets much worse and people don't get smart about reopening, testing and NPIs. I'm in Canada and looking south is a scary prospect, an epic tragedy is unfolding in the richest country on earth because of the dereliction of duty, criminal incompetence and stupidity of just one man, Donald Trump, he would never pay the price for this alone if he were tormented for a thousand years in Hell.
 
Last edited:

Puff_Dragon

Well-Known Member
He wasn't the democratic nominee ,just a supporter who donated money to rub elbows, the field was far too smart and talented for him there. He realised after Obama was elected and saw the rise of the tea party and birtherism, where his path lay. He was a natural con man and the republican party, as a reaction to Obama completely filled with racist scum and drove the good folks out. With Trump it was love at first sight as he promulgated the birther lie with glee. He was intensely jealous of Obama a regular middle class guy who was everything Donald was not, but tried to fake. Donald swept the GOP base off their feet, for the were base deplorable people and they fell in love, Donald blew the dog whistle of racism and bigotry into a bullhorn and they were enthralled, literally. Seduced by what they wanted to hear, the weak minded fell prey to the farce that Donald employed like a Star wars Sith Lord, drawing them ever further down the path to perdition. Donald is a Machiavellian moron and is socially and emotionally retarded, a no nothing with a talent for low cunning and corrupting others, other than that, he wouldn't know his own arse from a hot rock.
Oh right, as a Democratic nominee (so he was 'trying' at least). Sorry the process is a little alien to me. I didn't think he connected to the Republicans in the past (surprised the Democrats worked with him for so long).
Really, I just thought he was involved in politics for simply publicity/image/exposure. I truly think he was as shocked at becoming president as others were. I mean, he is a 'non politician'..and now he is in a very important political roll.
If I were to profile Donald, he is a person who wants everyone to love him. Therefore, I think he hates being president.
It will be interesting to see what the real story is (which will come out once he's out of office) ..and once all the mania dies down.
 

Puff_Dragon

Well-Known Member
Most of these MAGA people are racist traitors, or might as well be, America is really fighting for its soul in civil war two, the grey has become red and the Russians are helping too (just like with Brexit). The parties have switched sides paradoxically, but blue remains the color of the patriots and decent people, the choice is stark, it is between good and evil, plain and simple, survival vs death, put another way.
Personally I would never subcribe to a right/wrong, good/evil, duality in this (historically that seems to breed a radical mindset and a negative outcome for any society and its cohesion). But, thats me (and we are all allowed to have a full gamut of opinions ..without resorting to stoning one another). From the outside, its the polarised positions in this debate are the most worrying thing (to me). I don't think any side has a complete grasp of reality. But hey, I'm no Plato :)
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Oh right, as a Democratic nominee (so he was 'trying' at least). Sorry the process is a little alien to me. I didn't think he connected to the Republicans in the past (surprised the Democrats worked with him for so long).
Really, I just thought he was involved in politics for simply publicity/image/exposure. I truly think he was as shocked at becoming president as others were. I mean, he is a 'non politician'..and now he is in a very important political roll.
If I were to profile Donald, he is a person who wants everyone to love him. Therefore, I think he hates being president.
It will be interesting to see what the real story is (which will come out once he's out of office) ..and once all the mania dies down.
This is true about publicity, he ran for president not intending to win, just promote his business etc, he was dumbfounded when he won, he's fucked up everything he's ever touched,. How do you manage to bankrupt a casino, lose a big hunk of the family fortune, go 9 billion dollars in the hole while screwing everybody in sight including contractors and tradesmen? Also write the 9 billion dollar loss of others off on your taxes for a decade? Donald laundered Russian money for more than a decade, when nobody gave a fuck, they own his golf courses and him a dozen different ways. He's got Putin's arm shoved up his arse working his mouth like he was a ventriloquist dummy FFS, does Howdy Doody have wooden balls? :D
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Personally I would never subcribe to a right/wrong, good/evil, duality in this (historically that seems to breed a radical mindset and a negative outcome for any society and its cohesion). But, thats me (and we are all allowed to have a full gamut of opinions ..without resorting to stoning one another). From the outside, its the polarised positions in this debate are the most worrying thing (to me). I don't think any side has a complete grasp of reality. But hey, I'm no Plato :)
I'm an atheist and like to put these issues into moral terms, if you are driven by hatred and fear so much as to become a sucker and a national security threat, that I would define as evil, especially when you have no good reason to hate brown folks. The vast majority of white people are racist in America, these are people who fear a loss of social and economic status as other peoples arise in America, Obama was a warning shot for them of things to come, they panicked and went tribal as a stress reaction, Donald is more a symptom of a deeper illness, of the soul of the nation if you will.

BTW Morality has a biological bases in humans and is instinctively driven to an extent, it is now a field of study for evolutionary psychology and other such related fields.
 

topcat

Well-Known Member
Oh right, as a Democratic nominee (so he was 'trying' at least). Sorry the process is a little alien to me. I didn't think he connected to the Republicans in the past (surprised the Democrats worked with him for so long).
Really, I just thought he was involved in politics for simply publicity/image/exposure. I truly think he was as shocked at becoming president as others were. I mean, he is a 'non politician'..and now he is in a very important political roll.
If I were to profile Donald, he is a person who wants everyone to love him. Therefore, I think he hates being president.
It will be interesting to see what the real story is (which will come out once he's out of office) ..and once all the mania dies down.
No. Probably no one hates him being prezydint more than his latest wife/concubine. It's shown on her face on election night. He needs to be reelected in order to stay out of prison, that's all. He thrives on conflict and begs it on, his cult devours it. How does a savvy businessman go bankrupt in gambling and alcohol? They are recession-proof. The only answer is theft.
 

Johnny Lawrence

Well-Known Member
Nope an older man on the east coast who is wise enough to see a fool like you. You're projecting, you, are the one whining and squealing like a little girl about justice being done. You are the one whose heart is blinded by hate and whose brain is half shut down, a dangerous thing when you have as little brains to begin with as you.
Okay, Karen.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
As an outsider (UK - 51st state - and when it comes to retarded, we can hang with the best). I must commend all sides in this debate on Rollup forums.
I mean, you all will go 'hammer and tongs' at it ..but, I get the feeling that most of you (if confronted by one another in real life) would just end up having a joint together and laughing about the stupidity of life. Which, is a good thing.

As for the political debate itself, about the current Commander in Chef. I'm just still wrapping my head around the hilarious way the 2016 election all played out.
If I'm figuring it correctly:
a person who always aligned himself with the Democrats, was supported by the Democrats, always ran as a Democrat, supported Democratic campaigns (like the Clintons) throughout his life and aligned himself (and gained awards from) various communities in the US. When he was then denied a Democratic ticket for the 2016 election went,
"ok .." and immediately turned to the Republicans.
"So, have you guys got a spare ticket?"
Laughing (because they viewed him as an idiot and a joke) the Republicans went "sure, take this ticket" *giggle giggle what can he do*.

Then, with some added help of a spectacularly bad campaign by Hillary and her treatment of other Democratic candidates like ol' JoeB (and some terrible coverage by the media) Donald gets elected with a low number of votes due to overall lower turnout. I believe, he got less votes then the number of votes the last Republican who ran against Barrack got! (as for Hillary's vote numbers *ouch*)

So, then the Republicans were like "What the F ..he WON!?!?" (and you know good Republicans hate swearing ;)
While the Democrats, seemed to lose their collective 'shit' (so to speak)
So you had 'basically' a Democratic runner, who became President and the head of the Republican Party (as a Democrat ..I have to just say that again *lol*). And so, he is hated by the Republican Party and reviled by the Democratic Party. And, if you remove Donald, the guy who replaces him (vice president) ..thinks the Earth is less than 5000 years old!
In the past, us Brits might have called this situation a bit of a 'sticky wicket' ;-)


Forget the rest, this election conundrum alone fascinates me. In keeping with the divine comedy it is.
I know they will teach it in books in generations to come. Which ..I'm sure Donald will love (any publicity Is good publicity after all :)

Peace.
It's totally understandable that you'd like people to think that conservative ideology in the US is not based on white supremacist nationalism.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Maybe you should ask Bill Gates, the forced vaccinator wannabe. Or his dad, the "planned parent" Nazi.

Or his grandfather, a eugenics proponent.

Or yourself, the guy who abused his daughter's financial future by your slurping at the phony free money trough like an Animal Farm pig.

You have little regard for consent being a vital component in human relations.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Maybe you should ask Bill Gates, the forced vaccinator wannabe. Or his dad, the "planned parent" Nazi.

Or his grandfather, a eugenics proponent.

Or yourself, the guy who abused his daughter's financial future by your slurping at the phony free money trough like an Animal Farm pig.

You have little regard for consent being a vital component in human relations.
Do I detect a note of hostility Rob?
 
Top