Will You Take The Vaccine?
- Thread starter Unclebaldrick
- Start date
CunningCanuk
Well-Known Member
Perfect timing.
Bill and Melinda Gates are ending their marriage
www.cnn.com
Bill and Melinda Gates are ending their marriage
Bill and Melinda Gates are ending their marriage
Bill and Melinda Gates are ending their marriage after 27 years, the pair announced in a statement on their verified Twitter accounts.
www.cnn.com
Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
Why do I feel like I just got done shopping at Thrift shop after the AZ shot. God love public healthcare, it’s almost free for a reason ..... Sunny Ways!!!
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
In a sneak peek of her soon to be published tell all book, Melinda reveals Bill is both micro and soft.Perfect timing.
Bill and Melinda Gates are ending their marriage
Bill and Melinda Gates are ending their marriage
Bill and Melinda Gates are ending their marriage after 27 years, the pair announced in a statement on their verified Twitter accounts.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
unlike all the dudes who raped you in prison while your kids went fatherless
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
CunningCanuk
Well-Known Member
When did you get it? It’s been 3 weeks since mine.
CunningCanuk
Well-Known Member
FDA to authorize Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine for 12-to-15-year-olds by early next week, official says
www.cnn.com
FDA to authorize Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine for 12-to-15-year-olds by early next week, official says | CNN
The FDA is poised to authorize Pfizer/BioNTech's coronavirus vaccine in children and teens ages 12 to 15 by early next week, a federal government official tells CNN.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
FDA to authorize Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine for 12-to-15-year-olds by early next week, official says
FDA to authorize Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine for 12-to-15-year-olds by early next week, official says | CNN
The FDA is poised to authorize Pfizer/BioNTech's coronavirus vaccine in children and teens ages 12 to 15 by early next week, a federal government official tells CNN.
printer
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Noam Chomsky quote:
“You can’t expect somebody to become a biologist by giving them access to the Harvard University biology library and saying, “Just look through it.” That will give them nothing. The internet is the same, except magnified enormously.”
“You can’t expect somebody to become a biologist by giving them access to the Harvard University biology library and saying, “Just look through it.” That will give them nothing. The internet is the same, except magnified enormously.”
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
We aren't gonna get booster shots for new variants any time soon with the global pandemic situation. I think the government should be more proactive in domestic vaccine production, even if we have to do it with a fucking crown corporation, a great socialist enterprise should bring some private outfits around. We need to produce the AZ non profit vaccine in very large quantities and an mRNA vaccine for domestic variant booster shots and future therapeutic applications. There needs to be a big government multinational program to produce cheap vaccines in very large amounts ASAP, this is gonna go on for a long time. We are gonna have to vaccinate billions of people and perhaps some domestic animals too, then we are probably gonna have to do it all over again with variant booster shots.
Producing the AZ vaccine is fairly straight forward with existing facilities and bioreactors, ditto for the J&J, but we should be thinking large scale and come up with a plan in cooperation with Uncle Joe. Waiting for Europe or China or America to save the world is not an option, we need to be into this up to our eyeballs. We should have 700 million left over doses to give away when the back orders come in, but much more needs to be done and urgently too. India is the worlds largest vaccine producer, but is clearly gonna be out of the international supply game for awhile. Exporting vaccines from India in the current situation would get any government burned at the stake.
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
Denmark ditches J&J COVID-19 shots from vaccination programme
Denmark on Monday became the first country to exclude Johnson & Johnson's (JNJ.N) COVID-19 shots from its vaccination programme over a potential link to a rare but serious form of blood clot.
Doug Dawson
Well-Known Member
I really wonder about that. Yes it has a higher issue rate than other vaccinations but with such a small percentage of people showing any adverse affects that seems odd.Denmark ditches J&J COVID-19 shots from vaccination programme
Denmark on Monday became the first country to exclude Johnson & Johnson's (JNJ.N) COVID-19 shots from its vaccination programme over a potential link to a rare but serious form of blood clot.www.reuters.com
View attachment 4893867
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
Do you really know what the % is? A recent study by Harvard showed that only the number of anaphylactic side effects are around100 times what the CDC has suggested . If all other side effects were also so widely under-estimated, if really makes one question what the real numbers are, especially considering that it's commonly considered that only !5 of side-effects are reported to the mandatory VAERS reporting system at the CDC.
...
Herb & Suds
Well-Known Member
Au contraire The right wing has a lock on Viagra, so Bill may be going to the dark side
Hoes and Jezus uknow
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
Do you ever question the stupid shit you think matters because you seem to really want to believe that people should stay unsafe because you have allergies.Do you really know what the % is? A recent study by Harvard showed that only the number of anaphylactic side effects are around100 times what the CDC has suggested . If all other side effects were also so widely under-estimated, if really makes one question what the real numbers are, especially considering that it's commonly considered that only !5 of side-effects are reported to the mandatory VAERS reporting system at the CDC.
View attachment 4893888
...
View attachment 4893889
Now it is early, and I am not even a couple sips into my coffee.
But 52,805 (employees) *.02(the percent of that group that had a allergic reaction = 1056 people had allergic reactions.
And in that group of 52,805, 4,000 people had 'significant allergies to food and medications', while only 1056 had a reaction to the vaccine according to the part you posted. 4000>1056. Basically meaning a quarter of the people you would expect to have issues with the vaccine actually did.
