AP: The super spreaders behind top COVID-19 conspiracy theories

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
lol this dude triggered the Fox propagandist when all she wanted to do is snowflake about their tree getting burned down by some crazy nut.

 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://apnews.com/article/business-elections-media-lawsuits-voting-a8968f707a9733de20141b9ebce819b3Screen Shot 2021-12-17 at 7.18.18 AM.png
WASHINGTON (AP) — A judge Thursday rejected a motion by Fox News to dismiss a $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit brought against the cable news giant by Dominion Voting Systems over claims about the 2020 presidential election.

In the 52-page ruling Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis said that the voting machine company had shown that “At this stage, it is reasonably conceivable that Dominion has a claim for defamation per se.”

Denver-based Dominion filed a lawsuit earlier this year against the media organization alleging that some Fox News employees elevated false charges that Dominion had changed votes in the 2020 election through algorithms in its voting machines that had been created in Venezuela to rig elections for the late dictator Hugo Chavez. On-air personalities brought on Trump allies who spread the claims, and then amplified those claims on Fox News’ social media platforms.

There was no evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 election, a fact that a range of election officials across the country — and even Trump’s attorney general, William Barr — confirmed. An Associated Press review of every potential case of voter fraud in the six battleground states disputed by former President Donald Trump has found fewer than 475 — a number that would have made no difference in the 2020 presidential election.

BUSINESS
Inflation a worry for most economies, but not Japan
Judge rejects Purdue Pharma’s sweeping opioid settlement
China vows to respond after US enacts Xinjiang sanctions
Delaware judge rejects Fox News motion to dismiss lawsuit

In denying the motion to dismiss the lawsuit Davis said that Dominion’s complaint “supports the reasonable inference that Fox either (i) knew its statements about Dominion’s role in election fraud were false or (ii) had a high degree of awareness that the statements were false.”

Davis said that “Fox possessed countervailing evidence of election fraud from the Department of Justice, election experts, and Dominion at the time it had been making its statements. The fact that, despite this evidence, Fox continued to publish its allegations against Dominion, suggests Fox knew the allegations were probably false.”

The judge also wrote that despite emails from Dominion attempting to factually address Fox’s fraud allegations, Fox and its news personnel continued to report Dominion’s “purported connection to the election fraud claims without also reporting on Dominion’s emails.”

“Given that Fox apparently refused to report contrary evidence ... the Complaint’s allegations support the reasonable inference that Fox intended to keep Dominion’s side of the story out of the narrative.”

Fox News Media said in a statement that “As we have maintained, Fox News, along with every single news organization across the country, vigorously covered the breaking news surrounding the unprecedented 2020 election, providing full context of every story with in-depth reporting and clear-cut analysis. We remain committed to defending against this baseless lawsuit and its all-out assault on the First Amendment.”

Fox News had sought to have the lawsuit dismissed arguing that its coverage is protected by the First Amendment and that a free press must be able to report both sides of a story involving claims that strike at the core of democracy.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Rand Paul is a total lying shit bag con artist.



lol I timed this @ about 1:30:00 for Senator Marshall who is a complete jackass who also fell flat on his face trying to 'own' Fauci too.


Notice that he is trying to blame Biden for January 2021 deaths like a good cherry picking propagandist.
Screen Shot 2022-01-11 at 8.36.12 PM.png


He pops back up again with another stupid prop at about 3:24:00.

Screen Shot 2022-01-11 at 8.45.03 PM.png

After saying that this guy is amazingly uninformed, Fauci calls him a moron after the questioning that was caught by reporters. It really is amazing how stupid this senator is.


Screen Shot 2022-01-11 at 8.49.11 PM.png
 
Last edited:

hanimmal

Well-Known Member

Great explanations with their charts of the effectiveness of the propaganda attack against vaccines.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
So the New England Journal of Medicine came out with a study that showed that while vaccinated people were less likely to get infected by the Corona Virus, and had a lower severity when they did, there was no actual difference in how long someone still tested positive for having it. Basically confirming what doctors have been saying all along.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2202092
Screen Shot 2022-07-31 at 12.29.03 AM.png




But that doesn't stop the local troll from making a Death Cult propaganda titled thread that then spams the forum with a false title. And then attempts to 'own the libs' by using the quote Biden correctly stated after it became clear that unvaccinated people who were wrongly brainwashed into thinking the vaccines were unsafe, after seeing shit like the troll's thread over and over again as it keeps getting bumped by the other troll accounts.

https://www.rollitup.org/t/vaccinated-stay-contagious-longer-than-unvaccinated.1078102/Screen Shot 2022-07-31 at 8.56.56 AM.png

Anything to change the narrative from the fact that the Republicans are falling apart with their fascist anti-American agenda.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
So the New England Journal of Medicine came out with a study that showed that while vaccinated people were less likely to get infected by the Corona Virus, and had a lower severity when they did, there was no actual difference in how long someone still tested positive for having it. Basically confirming what doctors have been saying all along.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2202092
View attachment 5172522




But that doesn't stop the local troll from making a Death Cult propaganda titled thread that then spams the forum with a false title. And then attempts to 'own the libs' by using the quote Biden correctly stated after it became clear that unvaccinated people who were wrongly brainwashed into thinking the vaccines were unsafe, after seeing shit like the troll's thread over and over again as it keeps getting bumped by the other troll accounts.

https://www.rollitup.org/t/vaccinated-stay-contagious-longer-than-unvaccinated.1078102/View attachment 5172521

Anything to change the narrative from the fact that the Republicans are falling apart with their fascist anti-American agenda.
The ONLY reason I got ba,5, was because I HAD to get my steroids and building hallways never had the fan or AC turned on this summer AGAIN..your immune system is down for three weeks- I made it through two weeks, but I have to pass through it to get to my apartment.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
The ONLY reason I got ba,5, was because I HAD to get my steroids and building hallways never had the fan or AC turned on this summer AGAIN..your immune system is down for three weeks- I made it through two weeks, but I have to pass through it to get to my apartment.
That sucks you got sick, I hope you get through it quickly.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Yah, all this time being cautious, washing hands, masking, being made fun of; I was tripped up by the place I live.
Absolutely understand.

It is a shame that so many people are sold the Death Cult nonsense because trolls like the one in the other thread just continually bump their titles that are lies in order to spam false narratives into people's brains to the point they think they are right to shame people that are just trying to be safe.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Absolutely understand.

It is a shame that so many people are sold the Death Cult nonsense because trolls like the one in the other thread just continually bump their titles that are lies in order to spam false narratives into people's brains to the point they think they are right to shame people that are just trying to be safe.
You know early on, one guy spit at me?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Rand Paul is a total lying shit bag con artist.



lol I timed this @ about 1:30:00 for Senator Marshall who is a complete jackass who also fell flat on his face trying to 'own' Fauci too.


Notice that he is trying to blame Biden for January 2021 deaths like a good cherry picking propagandist.
View attachment 5065110


He pops back up again with another stupid prop at about 3:24:00.

View attachment 5065113

After saying that this guy is amazingly uninformed, Fauci calls him a moron after the questioning that was caught by reporters. It really is amazing how stupid this senator is.


View attachment 5065114
What's really scary is that there are more just like him- backwater asshats that reflect those who vote him in- and they get two votes because rural.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://www.rawstory.com/vaccine-children-under-12/
Screen Shot 2022-08-04 at 3.05.44 PM.png
Even before the COVID-19 vaccine was authorized, there was a plan to discredit it.

Leaders in the anti-vaccination movement attended an online conference in October 2020 — two months before the first shot was administered — where one speaker presented on “The 5 Reasons You Might Want to Avoid a COVID-19 Vaccine” and another referred to the “untested, unproven, very toxic vaccines.”

But that was only the beginning. Misinformation seeped into every corner of social media, onto Facebook feeds and into Instagram images, pregnancy apps and Twitter posts. Pregnant people emerged as a target. A disinformation campaign preyed on their vulnerability, exploiting a deep psychological need to protect their unborn children at a moment when so much of the country was already gripped by fear.

“It’s just so powerful,” said Imran Ahmed, the founder and chief executive officer of the U.S. nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate, which tracks online disinformation.

A majority of the disinformation came from a group of highly organized, economically motivated actors, many of them selling supplements, books or even miracle cures, he said. They told people the vaccine may harm their unborn child or deprive them of the opportunity to become parents. Some even infiltrated online pregnancy groups and asked seemingly harmless questions, such as whether people had heard the vaccine could potentially lead to infertility.

The Center for Countering Digital Hate found that nearly 70% of anti-vaccination content could be traced to 12 people, whom they dubbed The Disinformation Dozen. They reached millions of people and tested their messaging online, Ahmed said, to see what was most effective — what was most frequently shared or liked — in real time.

“The unregulated and unmoderated effects of social media where people are allowed to spread disinformation at scale without consequences meant that this took hold very fast,” Ahmed said. “That’s had a huge effect on women deciding not to take the vaccine.”

Some people, such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr., seized on the initial dearth of research into vaccines in pregnant people. “With no data showing COVID vaccines are safe for pregnant women, and despite reports of miscarriages among women who have received the experimental Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, Fauci and other health officials advise pregnant women to get the vaccine,” Kennedy posted in February 2021 on Facebook. Kennedy did not respond to requests for comment.

Disinformation flourished, in part, because pregnant people were not included in the vaccine’s initial clinical trials. Excluding pregnant people also omitted them from the data on the vaccine’s safety, which created a vacuum where disinformation spread. Unsure about how getting the shots might affect their pregnancy — and without clear guidance at the time from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — pregnant people last year had some of the lowest vaccination rates among adults.

The decision to delay or avoid vaccination, often made out of an abundance of caution and love for the baby growing inside of them, had dire consequences: Unvaccinated women who contracted COVID-19 while pregnant were at a higher risk of stillbirths — the death of a fetus at 20 weeks or more of pregnancy — and several other complications, including maternal death.

Although initial clinical trials did not include pregnant people, the Food and Drug Administration ensured that vaccines met a host of regulatory safety standards before authorizing them. Citing numerous studies that have since come out showing the vaccine is safe, the CDC now strongly recommends that people who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant get vaccinated. The major obstetric organizations, including The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, also urge pregnant people to get vaccinated.

But two and a half years into the pandemic, misinformation is proving resilient.

A May 2022 Kaiser Family Foundation poll found more than 70% of pregnant people or those planning to become pregnant believed or were unsure whether to believe at least one of the following popular examples of misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine: that pregnant people should not get vaccinated; that it’s unsafe to get vaccinated while breastfeeding; or that the vaccine has been shown to cause infertility. None of which are true.

Dr. Laura Morris, a University of Missouri, Columbia family physician who delivers babies, has heard all those falsehoods and more from her patients. She has long relied on science to help encourage them to make well-informed decisions.

But when officials rolled out the vaccine, she found herself without her most powerful tool, data. The disinformation didn’t have to completely convince people that the vaccine was dangerous; creating doubt often was sufficient.

“That level of uncertainty is enough to knock them off the path to accepting vaccination,” Morris said. “Instead of seeing vaccines as something that will make them healthier and improve their pregnancy outcomes, they haven’t received the right information to make them feel confident that this is actually healthy.”

Before COVID-19, Morris typically saw one stillbirth every couple of years. Since the pandemic started, she said she has been seeing them more often. All followed a COVID-19 diagnosis in an unvaccinated patient just weeks before they were due. Not only did Morris have to deliver the painful news that their baby had died, she also told them that the outcome might have been different had they been vaccinated. Some, she said, felt betrayed at having believed the lies surrounding the vaccine.

“You have to have that conversation very carefully,” Morris said, “because this is a time where the people are feeling awful and grieving and there’s a lot of guilt associated with these situations that’s not deserved.”

In December 2021, the Federation of State Medical Boards found a proliferation of misinformation about COVID-19 among health care workers. Two-thirds of state medical boards reported an increase in complaints about misinformation, but fewer than 1 in 4 of them reported disciplining the doctors or other health care workers.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, an osteopath, was the speaker at the October 2020 conference who called the COVID-19 vaccine “toxic.” She later testified at an Ohio state House Health Committee hearing on the Enact Vaccine Choice and Anti-Discrimination Act. She falsely claimed that the vaccine could magnetize people. “They can put a key on their forehead, it sticks,” she said. “They can put spoons and forks all over them, and they could stick.” She also questioned the connection between the vaccine and 5G towers.

Despite her statements, the State Medical Board of Ohio has not taken any disciplinary action against her. Her medical license remains active. Tenpenny did not respond to requests for comment.

It’s difficult to know exactly how many doctors were disciplined, a term that can mean anything from sending them letters of guidance to revoking their license. State medical boards in some cases refused to disclose even the number of complaints received.

Some records were made public if formal disciplinary action was taken, as in the case of Dr. Mark Brody. The Rhode Island physician sent a letter to his patients that the state medical board determined contained several falsehoods, including claims that “there exists the possibility of sterilizing all females in the population who receive the vaccination.” The Rhode Island Board of Medical Licensure and Discipline reprimanded him for the letter, then suspended his medical license after other professional conduct issues were uncovered. He surrendered his license in December.

Brody said in an interview that he stands by the letter. He said the word “misinformation” has been politicized and used to discredit statements with which people disagree.

Screen Shot 2022-08-04 at 3.17.05 PM.png
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://www.rollitup.org/t/vaccinated-stay-contagious-longer-than-unvaccinated.1078102/post-17050985https://www.rollitup.org/t/vaccinated-stay-contagious-longer-than-unvaccinated.1078102/post-17050985

Screen Shot 2022-08-16 at 9.18.05 PM.png


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/08/30/false-claim-that-fully-approved-pfizer-vaccine-lacks-liability-protection/
Screen Shot 2022-08-16 at 9.24.46 PM.png
“The little trick that they have done here: They have issued two separate letters for two separate vaccines. The Pfizer vaccine which is currently available is still under emergency use authorization and it still has the liability shield … The product that’s licensed … it’s called Comirnaty. … that’s the one that liability waiver will no longer apply to.”
— Robert Malone, interview on Bannons War Room, Aug. 24

Malone, a physician who bills himself as having played a key role in creation of mRNA vaccines, is a prominent skeptic of the coronavirus vaccines that have been crafted using the technology. Shortly after the Food and Drug Administration fully authorized the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, he appeared on a program hosted by Stephen K. Bannon, a one-time adviser to former president Donald Trump, and claimed that the full authorization was a bait-and-switch game played by the FDA.

“One again the mainstream media has lied to you,” he said. “Sorry to say that. I know it’s a shock to this viewership.”

In essence, his argument was that the approved vaccine would no longer have liability protections so Pfizer would simply keep distributing in the United States the product that had been authorized for emergency use.

A similar claim was made by Robert F. Kennedy, a leading anti-vaccine campaigner.

“Licensed adult vaccines, including the new Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield,” Kennedy wrote with a co-author in an Aug. 24 post. “Just as with Ford’s exploding Pinto, or Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup, people injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could sue for damages. And because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards could be astronomical. Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product.”

These claims are false, based on a misunderstanding of the law, as Malone acknowledged after we contacted him.

“Emergency Use Authorization” (EUA) allowed the FDA to quickly approve the vaccines for distribution to millions of Americans, but that designation also spawned skepticism and vaccine hesitancy among some people. The government hopes that full authorization will ease those concerns. Full approval also means that companies, governments and the Pentagon can begin to order employees to get vaccinated as a condition of employment, as they do for other fully-authorized vaccines.

The letters issued by the FDA are obtuse and written in legalese, which make it easy for people to misunderstand them. Skeptics have focused on a footnote on page 2 of the letter to Pfizer: “The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”

But this footnote has nothing to do with liability protection, according to Pfizer and government officials.

“The statement that the products are ‘legally distinct with certain differences’ refers to the differences in manufacturing information included in the respective regulatory submissions,” said Pfizer spokesperson Sharon J. Castillo in an email. “Specifically, while the products are manufactured using the same processes, they may have been manufactured at different sites or using raw materials from different approved suppliers. FDA closely reviews all manufacturing steps, and has found explicitly that the EUA and BLA [biologics license application] products are equivalent.”

Indeed, contrary to the claims of Malone and others, the Comirnaty vaccine has the same liability protection as the vaccine approved under the EUA. That’s because of a law known as the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act).
In early 2020, after the coronavirus emerged, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar invoked the PREP Act to “provide liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against covid-19.” So that covers all vaccines that might be produced to combat the coronavirus, whether fully authorized or not.

The PREP Act designation means that claims related to coronavirus vaccines are covered by the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), not the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which was set up to handle vaccine lawsuits.

In other words, a person cannot sue a manufacturer for an injury caused by a vaccine or other product listed as a countermeasure, but they can seek compensation from CICP filing a claim. The intent of the law is to urge manufacturers to quickly gear up to combat a possible pandemic without fear of lawsuits. (There is an exception in the law if a person can prove “willful misconduct” by a manufacturer.)

Claims filed under CICP for lost income are capped at $50,000 per year and unlike the VICP it does not provide any compensation for pain, suffering, emotional distress, or similar damages. Cases filed under VICP also have limitations; they are heard in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, where there are no juries and a court-appointed special master decides the case.

The CICP website shows that as of Aug. 2, 686 people have alleged injuries or deaths from coronavirus vaccines but so far no countermeasure claims have received any compensation.

“The liability protections afforded under the PREP Act are tied to the declared public health emergency and not whether the vaccine is sold under an EUA,” Castillo said. “Therefore, both Comirnaty and the Pfizer-BioNTech covid-19 vaccine receive the same liability protections as medical countermeasures against covid-19.”

“There are no liability or compensation differences between a countermeasure approved under an EUA or one that has received full FDA approval,” confirmed an HHS spokesperson.

Castillo said that as of Aug. 22, the day before the FDA authorization was announced, Pfizer had shipped more 1.3 billion doses. The company expects to produce 3 billion doses of the vaccine this year. FDA acting commissioner Janet Woodcock told reporters that the EUA version produced pre-authorization can be used interchangeably with the fully authorized version as that become more widely available.

“They are made using the same processes, and there are no differences between them in safety or effectiveness,” Castillo said.

The European Union in December approved the Comirnaty vaccine and so it already has been distributed by member states under that brand name.

Malone quickly conceded his statement on the Bannon show was wrong. “When one is doing rapid analysis on the fly, one does not always get everything right,” he told The Fact Checker. “On this particular legal liability issue I did not hunt down the details myself, and relied on comments from a third party lawyer which were not fully correct.” He said the statements we received from Pfizer and HHS “are consistent with my current understanding.”

As regular readers know, we generally do not award Pinocchios when a person admits error. Otherwise, this would be a Four-Pinocchio claim. Malone was too quick to embrace false information (while bashing the mainstream media at the same time). The liability protection for Comirnaty is the same as the vaccine that was previously approved under emergency authorization, so that is not a bar to distributing the fully-approved vaccine in the United States
 
Top