Molasses

[SmokerE]

I bet the Patriots go 16-0 this year

 

[kieahtoka]

I bet the Patriots go 16-0 this year

sorry SmokerE, I think this thread is too ingrained in the current topic to get much of a change..

 

[SmokerE]

But they have Randy Moss and Adalius Thomas!

 

[SmokerE]

or how about molasses, isn't that was this thread is about? I'll drink a bottle of it to see if my plants grow better!

 

[kieahtoka]

or how about molasses, isn't that was this thread is about? I'll drink a bottle of it to see if my plants grow better!

I bet I can drink one first!!!

 

[SmokerE]

you'll need a chaser! I'm downing it!

 

[kieahtoka]

Damn I've never tastes molasses before. tastes like honey with a side of puke. sorry man you downed that one on your own.

 

[SmokerE]

That wasn't worth it. I should have bet money or something.

 

[SmokerE]

your growing in rocks??

 

[VirginHarvester]

don't bother. grasscity sucks.

I think any place to find good info helps and there's some great info and a lot of activity on grasscity. Having said that, there are some real assholes and it kind of cracks me up. Some people aren't very bright and bolster the notion that drugs make you stupid. Either that or our schools are so far downhill it's pathetic. But I have had run ins with people there that absolutely cannot speak or write English above a third grade level and they're making judgments and calling names. So it goes I guess.

 

[mogie]

Strange crowd there.

 

[hempie]

since i cant help but get in the middle of a good cat fight i must say this... WTF?!?! who cares what does what. you are both cut and paste habitually. and neither give credit to the person you got it from. however mogie does admit to it when its pointed out and then claims to be the queen of c&p.. i think a good old fashioned mud wrestling match would take care of this foolish feud. as far as the molasses part goes. there are too many people that believe it works. so why not give it a try and if you feel that it doesnt work then have some fkn waffles..

 

[babygro]

So back to BabyGoo copying and posting. She chewed my butt saying I didn't present new info by doing that. She claimed to be new and informative. But she was caught copying and posting. No response yet huh babygoo.

Hiya Mogie

You can have a response to your message, but you might not like what it contains.

Yes, I'm getting a little weary of the bashing I'm getting on here and it's time to start answering some of this criticism. Are you up to it Mogie?

Yes I have mentioned to you in open forum that constantly (note the use of the word constantly) quoting and citing references from the GrowFAQ that is now mostly 3-4 years out of date, and many parts of which now need updating wasn't of much use to newbie growers and also that some of it is simply wrong.

Just because it's listed in the GrowFAQ doesn't automatically make it right! You still haven't seem to have got it into your head that pre-flowers are not differentiated at 4 weeks vegetative growth AND I DONT CARE WHAT THE GROWFAQ SAYS!!! It's simply wrong. I've only just seen differentiated pre-flowers on my plants at 8 weeks for christs sake.

This is the problem when you rely on out of date information - you give out, out of date and wrong information and consequently I've had to correct you spewing it into the forums.

Now compare that to my recent copy and paste of a huge article on Molasses that was of interest to a person reading this thread - VirginHarvester. He was asking questions about Molasses that hadn't been answered here, because that information is not contained in the GrowFAQ. Rather than continue to answer his questions I felt that if he read that article on Molasses he would gain all the information and knowledge he needed - and so would others.

Yet all I get for my troubles in helping to inform someone is criticism for cutting and pasting an article of interest to someone reading this thread.

If the information was already contained and easy to find in the GrowFAQ, I wouldn't have to copy and paste he would I?

This chick has followed me around this site and bitched (usually in private messages) about everything from copying and pasting to FAQ. I didn't see Babygoo volunteering to help with FAQ when I begged for volunteers. She didn't even submit one article. Nothing.

I haven't followed you around on this site at all.. If I've seen you post bad information or advice - I've corrected you on it. No more.

Neither have I had one solitary discussion with you in private message about your cutting and pasting either, I have better things to do with my time.

What I have done is had a rather pointless private message exchange with you about the possible updating of the site GrowFAQ, which was all copied to Rollitup, as you well know.

In this exchange it soon became apparent to me several things. Firstly, that whilst you've done as best a job as you could in organising the GrowFAQ as it stands at the moment, and you should be applauded for the work and effort you've put into it, you've pretty much taken the GrowFAQ on this site as far as you can.

You don't have the depth of knowledge to now go through each and every FAQ and edit and update them with new information because you cannot think independantly and outside of that FAQ which was based on the old Overgrow FAQ's. Neither does it appear that you possess the ability to restructure the FAQ contents into a form that people can navigate easily. Your only defence against this was that 'people are lazy and can't be bothered to find things for themselves'. Yes, some people are lazy and won't bother to find things, but a lot of people will if the structure is there to make it easy for them.

So because of your reluctance to either let go of control over the GrowFAQ or let someone else have some positive input into its updating and restructuring, the newbie growers on this site continue to suffer in three ways: 1) Hardly any of them can actually find anything in the GrowFAQ relevant to what they're looking for 2) even when they do find some relevant information frequently it's wrong or out of date and 3) new growers continue to post their questions in the newbie forum rather than read a hard to navigate FAQ and this allows inexperienced and lacking in knowledge members of this site to go and give them wrong information.

All because your ego's too big to allow someone else to take the GrowFAQ on this site to a level you can't hope to.

So Baby how is the article coming that I asked you for months ago? You were so full of complaints I asked you to put that energy into something productive. Oh that's right still no article or even an answer to my message. How RUDE!!!!

I think I've made it quite clear to you here, that I have no intention whatsoever to provide you with anything while you continue to stand guard over the GrowFAQ and refuse to allow anyone else to update and reorganise it into a format useful to everyone - particularly novice and newbie growers.

Your inflated ego is holding this site back, not me.

 

[babygro]

I remember BabyGoo telling me that the info from OverGrow was old and outdated. That I was spreading old info and now she it doing it. So it's bad for me to but okay for her? I think she is hormonal.

Some information from OverGrow in the site FAQ is outdated. The information I posted on Molasses didn't come from Overgrow and isn't out of date either.

Do you have problems with basic comprehension? or do you have problems with basic logic? Because if you didn't, you wouldn't post this bunch of complete bullshit, but it appears you lack the ability to differentiate between what information is good, relevant, useful and up to date and information that isn't.

No wonder the GrowFAQ on this site is such a fucking state.

I've taken a lot of shit on this site in the last couple of days, now I'm dishing some back - hope you enjoy getting it back as much as you did in dishing it out.

 

[babygro]

Well she IS the queen of copy and paste you know.

Am I now? I can list three instances recently of where I've copied and pasted infformation. The first was on 'Stretching' which I felt was useful to newbie growers to read. The second was in the thread about 'moisture stress' where I referred you to a paragraph from the FAQ on moisture stress. The final one was on Molasses, which isn't not in the site FAQ.

How does that make me a 'queen' of anything?

alot of the time what she says is BS

Point out where anything I've said can be considered bullshit? You might think it's bullshit, but then you're hardly in any position to judge, having not even completed a single grow yet.

ad most of the time alot of what she says contradicts something she has said previously.

So, I assume if you're accusing me of something, you have plenty of proof and plenty of examples to support what you're saying here? Come up with them, put up or shut the fuck up.

I mean come on if you're gonna copy and paste at least read it first!

Come up with examples of the bullshit you're saying or shut the fuck up.

 

[babygro]

I agree reading it first does help. If I find something interesting I will copy and paste but I try to say something like hey look what I found.

Notice Baby hasn't had to balls to respond.

If you've got an example of something I've 'cut and pasted' that I've misinterpretted, let's see it.

Same to you as Kieahtoka, put up or shut the fuck up.

You're all mouth Mogie and no substance - give examples of the bullshit you're trying to spin here.

 

[kieahtoka]

You still haven't seem to have got it into your head that pre-flowers are not differentiated at 4 weeks vegetative growth AND I DONT CARE WHAT THE GROWFAQ SAYS!!! It's simply wrong. I've only just seen differentiated pre-flowers on my plants at 8 weeks for christs sake.

IF you had some common sense babygirl you'd know that this is not "simply wrong". It depends on the strain. Every strain has a different time to when it shows it's preflowers. Now to counter what you said I have a picture of my 4 week old plant. Hey what are those little thingies on the nodes eh? Don't go about spewing information that you have learned only from your plants and apply it to every plant on the face of the planet. What you have learned doesn't necessarily apply to everyone.

 

[babygro]

I don't think she's on right now oh but wait we'll get our asses licked with some c&p magic HAH. I hate going into a debate against that guy for long periods of time because after awhile the shit she puts up just isn't worth reading anymore. It's just the same crap over and over.

I wasn't on then, but I am now asshole.

You don't like going into a debate with me because you get your butt kicked from here to next week, because we're not even playing in the same ballpark jerkoff.

You want to bad mouth and dis me on here - come on then fuckwit, I'm here now.

 

[babygro]

IF you had some common sense babygirl you'd know that this is not "simply wrong". It depends on the strain. Every strain has a different time to when it shows it's preflowers. Now to counter what you said I have a picture of my 4 week old plant. Hey what are those little thingies on the nodes eh? Don't go about spewing information that you have learned only from your plants and apply it to every plant on the face of the planet. What you have learned doesn't necessarily apply to everyone.

Very few plants will show sex at 4 weeks vegetative growth, pre-flowers will form but are rarely differentiated.

On here we deal with 'likely' scenarios, not exceptions.

For the vast majority on here, they will never see pre-flowers at 4 weeks vegetative growth - and that's what matters to the majority. Not the minority.

It's pointless telling a newbie grower to watch for preflowers at 4 weeks Veg because 9 9times out of 100 they won't show.

It's as simple as that really, and I shall check on your grow log for the dates of your plants too.

 

[kieahtoka]

So, I assume if you're accusing me of something, you have plenty of proof and plenty of examples to support what you're saying here? Come up with them, put up or shut the fuck up.

Well fine let's see...

This persons plant is suffering from over-watering because it's been a slow build up of a little water at a time over a longer period.

If this is true then..

This is precisely the reason, that new growers must learn how to water their plants correctly using the 'wet/dry' pot method, fully saturating with plenty of run off to push out old stale oxygen and plant wastes and pull in fresh supplies of oxygen from the surface, and repeat when the pot becomes light. Small amounts of water given frequently is probably the worst thing you can do to water your plant.

If you say that the new grow had poor drainage and that there was a buildup of water in the bottom of the pot he was using. Then watering would have temporarily brought new oxygen to the plant yes, but in turn would have just repeated the same problem! Please clarify how Watering more would fix an over watering problem? And what would happen when the problem did repeat itself? Water more?