Stoner's views on Firearm rights.

Want to drop gun crime ... let all citizens have guns.

Simple.

here is where my girlfriend would say something like "then you have all the crazy people running around with guns"

not for long you dont... not for long
 
Even Felons can get their crime expunged, well some crimes, like drug crimes. I don't think violent crimes can be expunged, and probably for a very good reason. I had a possession with intent crime expunged 30Lbs of dank, and have a carry permit. Costs around 1,000-2,500, I got lucky and got it done for 750.00. I'm clean as a whistle, all the way to the FBI files.
 
Still living in a cave I see.

The lib's have been working very hard at restricting gun ownership, so don't sit there and say everyone can have guns, while everyone knows what liberals are really trying to do (psst, it isn't a secret).

Oh, I must be over reacting.

As usual, liberals are on the wrong side of history ... I'm shocked!
 
Still living in a cave I see.

The lib's have been working very hard at restricting gun ownership, so don't sit there and say everyone can have guns, while everyone knows what liberals are really trying to do (psst, it isn't a secret).

Oh, I must be over reacting.

As usual, liberals are on the wrong side of history ... I'm shocked!

I've lived in three states and was able to easily purchase guns in those states. So what restrictions do you speak of? I certainly haven't seen any. As for gun control, didn't the current democratic regime give concealed carriers MORE rights? Now we can enter national parks with our guns.
 
I get so bored of Liberal compartmentalising and pigeon holing. I dont believe guns are necessary and Im not Liberal. Liberals, as known in England, are people that sit on the fence and never have convictions, laissez-faire etc.
 
you do not believe they are necessary ok im cool with that


are you cool with people who choose to own guns owning guns?
 
Yes, we all know gun control efforts come from the right ... :roll:

I love when you post ... it's so entertaining. Naive, but entertaining.
 
If the law of the land states you can then it the choice of the individual.


sounds good to me i wish more people were like you

not this "i dont like guns so you shouldnt be allowed to own them" nonsense
 
Anyone who is crazy can get a gun anyways.

We know a guy who could kill a crazy with a slingshot.

Our good friend just bought another shotgun because
letting the meth head that crept out of the car that woke the dogs up sneaking into the driveway and began banging on the door at three in the morning hear him tell his wife and kid to loudly chamber rounds in the first ones worked so well.

Those phuckers decided it be best to go on down the dirt road looking for gas.
 
If the law of the land states you can then it the choice of the individual.

What if the manmade law
of the land goes against natural law? Would you follow it anyway? Will you only smoke pot, when THEY say it's okay to do it?

I suggest if a law is unjust don't follow it. As long as an Individual is harming nobody, why should anybody else have domain over them?
 
OK, all you libertarians quit paying your taxes. You all think that is an unjust law, LOL.


funny you should say that

med show me the law that the average american must pay a tax on their wages and labor


lol, this should be good, because no such law exists

argument fail

just for you med,

America: Freedom to Fascism

[youtube]VIB9FWKYNJ0[/youtube]


i will not post all parts, as you can click on them yourself
 
funny you should say that

med show me the law that the average american must pay a tax on their wages and labor


lol, this should be good, because no such law exists

So you're what......18, maybe 19? Because your naivete is simply amusing. When you get a job, neglect paying your taxes. Do it for long enough and you'll get a first hand experience with the legal legitimacy of tax-LAW! You kids....
 
OK, all you libertarians quit paying your taxes. You all think that is an unjust law, LOL.

Quit paying taxes? Great idea.

Here's an honest question for you...try to answer it without rationalizations...

If one person or set of people make decisions for another and decide when and how much you MUST pay for something you may not use or want how is it not unjust?
 
Back
Top