ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
lol well looking at internet forums always gives you a very poor window on life and we got 2 years left and my bet is a prezzie with titties who's stupid enough to press that big red button
lol i dont beleive in the prophecy itself as the mayans stated it alltho i think it might end up being self fulfilling one becuase of all the stupid people who really beleive itYes, the internet is the cradle of all sorts of crazy ideas.... like the world ending in 2012 because of an ancient calendar ...
Japan was told to surrender after the first bomb was dropped.... but they didn't. It took two.
Not to sure about your numbers. The blast my not have killed more during the war but as of 2009 there where still 20035k people suffering from the bombing. I bet alot of them were not even born when the bomb went off.we killed more people in japan through conventional firebombing than were killed in both nuclear bomb blasts.
even after hundreds of thousands of civilians had been burned to death, japan was still not willing to capitulate.
only after they were rocked by nukes did they come to their senses.
if they hadn't come to the bargaining table after that, the japanese americans in the camps might have been the only japanese left alive on the planet.
we were willing to eradicate them. Scrub them off their island nation like old paint from a park bench.
they are lucky they surrendered.
what the hell is 20035k?Not to sure about your numbers. The blast my not have killed more during the war but as of 2009 there where still 20035k people suffering from the bombing. I bet alot of them were not even born when the bomb went off.
they aren't more effective.sorry that would be 235,000. So you are saying 350,00 died over the coarse of the war due to carpet bombing, and the two nukes killed 200,00. I guess I still don't see the point. why are capet bombings more afective?
this is exactly why i think the world powers are a bunch of PUSSIES.I'm all for having a nuclear deterrent, but do we really need 2700 extremely redundant deterrents? Having them might have made us safe during the cold war, but today the 2600 we don't need are more of a nuisance than anything else. And know the russians have at least that many isn't very reassuring either. Interesting story: When the USSR collapsed, they couldn't even give a definite number on how many nuclear weapons they actually had. Because each branch of their military had it's own nuclear capability in addition to ICBMs, they genuinely had no idea exactly how many there were....
Interesting....
Hey CJ...were the japanese militaristic left-wing fascists just like the nazis?
yes, hitler would likely have turned on japan like he turned on russia.No, the Japanese were their own kind of crazy.... they just fit into the plans of Hitler to keep the US busy and to crush the British in Asia....crumbling their supply of rubber, which would have changed the outcome surely. They were a strategic alliance, not ideological, as with the Soviet Union.
By the way... you should ALREADY know these things...
Stay in skool kidzz.... or go to a better one.