Aren't you a mod? They really should reconsider who they give those positions to.
Since being a member here I have noticed that 'a few slight errors' have been made from time to time in who has been chosen to be a mod. I most certainly am NOT saying all those chosen over the years, or any in particular, have been less that fit for the position. But there have been enough that it has caused a good deal of friction and resentment and it has increased problems rather than reduced them, some have made things worse rather than better, some have become part of the problem rather than part of the solution.
Right now there is a too many cooks spoiling the soup situation. A short time back I had an experience with three mods who all had a problem with how I posted something. When I asked what the actual problem was, what was unacceptable, I was given three totally different explanations, and when I say totally different I mean it as in when one would say 'this is what was unacceptable....' the next said that very same thing was totally acceptable, but 'this is what was unacceptable.....' and then the next said those two things were totally Kool and the Gang, but 'this is what was unacceptable.....'
So, in the end how I posted was deemed to be both perfectly acceptable and also unacceptable at the exact same time according to three people here given the right to make the calls.
I won't even get into how some mods toll members like mad, and if it is mentioned, their response is that they were off duty and not in their mod roll at the time, so at the time they were only acting as members and nothing more, or as one said, the forum he was trolling in was not his forum to mod, which evidently was meant to say that made it perfectly acceptable for them to muck up some other mods forum by trolling.