It will reduce the deficit, just like when I overpaid my taxes by $.42 and told them to keep it. I reduced the deficit also. Same thing.Where in the hell do you hear in that video Fox News admit Obamacare will reduce the deficit?
It will reduce the deficit, just like when I overpaid my taxes by $.42 and told them to keep it. I reduced the deficit also. Same thing.Where in the hell do you hear in that video Fox News admit Obamacare will reduce the deficit?
But who gives a fuck, we'll all be dead by then anyway.Oh and for anyone with any finance skills can tell you that it will take 60 years of Obamacare savings just to pay for what extra we spent this year alone, and it will take 378 years to pay for all the deficit spending that has been done in the last 3.5 years. It will take 1891 years to pay off the entire deficit with that kind of savings, and that assumes interest rates will stay at 2%-3% forever.
I am not a Republican. I actually favor cutting defense by quite a bit.Spending more, like say, on defense?
They said according to congressional auditors you moron.Fox News did admit it, by truthfully reporting what the congressional audit found. You are so cheap.
Good job Clayton!They said according to congressional auditors you moron.
might as well be with your love of trickle down economics...I am not a Republican. I actually favor cutting defense by quite a bit.
You do its max 695 for an individual 2025 max for a familyA $2,025 tax is over 2.5 times what I said. The $4,159 actual plan is nearly 1.4 times what I said. The prices went up a bit since a few years ago when this was first proposed.
So who has their head up their ass now?
How about the provision which states hospital ERs will pay a penalty if a person goes to one twice in a month. Say a person is in a bad car crash. He comes back three weeks later with a brain aneurysm. Because of the penalty, ERs can deny patients for emergencies and force them to another ER. Right now witg no Obamacare, ERs can't turn away patients.
Way to go Obama!
Your savior sucks.
A Bucky groupie!Good job Clayton!
A Bucky groupie!
You want to be like the twerp that can't hold down a real job, pays no income taxes and pretends to have wealthy in-laws? lol lol lol
[h=1]après moi le déluge[/h]But who gives a fuck, we'll all be dead by then anyway.
Liar. They said "According to the Congressional Budget Office". You read into to it what you want to believe, not what was said. This is why it's pointless to argue with you. I see all the libtards are eagerly joining in. Sad, but we are becoming a nation of dreamers.http://www.examiner.com/article/fox-news-flip-flops-says-affordable-care-act-reduces-the-deficit?cid=db_articles Oh-no say it ain't so. Quick, make up more BS about doom and gloom before the deficit is gone.
CBO is only right when it supports a Republican argument. Which never happensoh god knows fox would not be reporting the news that a Congressional Budget Office concludedi t that way
http://www.cbo.gov/about/overview
Since its founding in 1974(almost as old as you red), the Congressional Budget Office has produced independent, nonpartisan, timely analysis of economic and budgetary issues to support the Congressional budget process. The agency's long tradition of nonpartisanship is evident in each of the dozens of reports and hundreds of cost estimates its economists and policy analysts produce each year. CBO analyses do not make policy recommendations, and each report and cost estimate discloses our assumptions and methodologies. All CBO employees are appointed solely on the basis of professional competence, without regard to political affiliation.
Faux Nooz finally reports the truth (definition of admitting) and instead of arguing the value of said truth, you goons fixate on whether or not Faux Nooz admitted anything. Then, as if to declare some victory-and you're the second petty SOB to commit this fallacy in the thread--say that I'm not worth arguing with.Liar. They said "According to the Congressional Budget Office". You read into to it what you want to believe, not what was said. This is why it's pointless to argue with you. I see all the libtards are eagerly joining in. Sad, but we are becoming a nation of dreamers.
Yes, is saysLiar. They said "According to the Congressional Budget Office". You read into to it what you want to believe, not what was said. This is why it's pointless to argue with you. I see all the libtards are eagerly joining in. Sad, but we are becoming a nation of dreamers.
So you actually think throwing 13million high risk people into insurance will reduce the cost?Faux Nooz finally reports the truth (definition of admitting) and instead of arguing the value of said truth, you goons fixate on whether or not Faux Nooz admitted anything. Then, as if to declare some victory-and you're the second petty SOB to commit this fallacy in the thread--say that I'm not worth arguing with.
You know why I'm really not worth arguing with? Because your logic is inferior everytime. I abase myself when prevailing logic is presented, it has just never been presented by the likes of you. Take a class or two.
A clip of Ryan schooling Obama on how the CBO works and the inaccurate info the Obama admin have them on Obamacare.oh god knows fox would not be reporting the news that a Congressional Budget Office concluded it that way
http://www.cbo.gov/about/overview
Since its founding in 1974(almost as old as you red), the Congressional Budget Office has produced independent, nonpartisan, timely analysis of economic and budgetary issues to support the Congressional budget process. The agency's long tradition of nonpartisanship is evident in each of the dozens of reports and hundreds of cost estimates its economists and policy analysts produce each year. CBO analyses do not make policy recommendations, and each report and cost estimate discloses our assumptions and methodologies. All CBO employees are appointed solely on the basis of professional competence, without regard to political affiliation.
Yes, and the CBO audit a confirms this.So you actually think throwing 13million high risk people into insurance will reduce the cost?