perhaps the fact that the rounds were in his pocket rather than in the gun ready to shoot means there was only 2 victims rather than the many more it could have been
is this a case of california's gun laws helping in part to stop this being worse?
well this time he had a pocket full of shells rather than a magazine full of themHow many gun laws do you think this kid broke?
How did those gun laws help again?
well this time he had a pocket full of shells rather than a magazine full of them
are you playing dumb or is your old memory just failing you?
What would registration accomplish?
If you are implying that registration would prevent those previously convicted of felonies from buying or owning guns, then what is the purpose of a background check? Are you just dumb, or is your proglodyte mind failing you?
I thought you wanted to get illegal guns out of criminals hands .... or is the inconvenience of it all just not worth it to you?
It was a double barreled shotgun....
How would that work with a magazine?
Prove that the gun was legally purchased, and in fact belongs to YOU.
If not, you go straight to jail. No questions asked.
I thought you wanted to get illegal guns out of criminals hands .... or is the inconvenience of it all just not worth it to you?
no, more stringent, tougher requirements would never catch the odd criminal here and there.
same formula every time there's another school shooting. you guys go into hyper-defensive mode claiming that there is nothing wrong. yet the hyper-defensive mode says otherwise.
can't wait until you die, old man.
If you are implying that registration would prevent those previously convicted of felonies from buying or owning guns, then what is the purpose of a background check? Are you just dumb, or is your proglodyte mind failing you?
lol
remind me again about california's gun laws
and as a result of those laws which guns would be easy to get your hands on?
Background check would prove that you are legally permitted to buy the gun, and when registered to you on a central database it would provide law enforcement quick access to verify that you are in fact the lawful owner of said gun.
Seems pretty simple to me. Don't we want to crack down on the "bad guys"? This would provide framework to possibly catch one of the "bad guys" with an illegal gun prior to using that illegal gun to carry out a crime.
Scratch a liberal, expose a fascist. It is so comforting to me to know that fascists are looking out for my interests by thumbing their noses at the constitution.
Background check would prove that you are legally permitted to buy the gun, and when registered to you on a central database it would provide law enforcement quick access to verify that you are in fact the lawful owner of said gun.
Seems pretty simple to me. Don't we want to crack down on the "bad guys"? This would provide framework to possibly catch one of the "bad guys" with an illegal gun prior to using that illegal gun to carry out a crime.
Background check would prove that you are legally permitted to buy the gun, and when registered to you on a central database it would provide law enforcement quick access to verify that you are in fact the lawful owner of said gun.
Seems pretty simple to me. Don't we want to crack down on the "bad guys"? This would provide framework to possibly catch one of the "bad guys" with an illegal gun prior to using that illegal gun to carry out a crime.
Where are all these gun *checks* going to occur?
A felon CANNOT have a gun. It doesnt matter if it is his gun or someone elses gun. The bad guys have illegal weapons that they have no intention of registering....
You keep trying to punish LEGAL gun owners.
How many laws did this kid break again?
Marijuana is illegal in California right?
Are you deluding yourself purposely or just trolling people?