People who call themselves "hunters"

natalie_martinez_08120703.jpg
 
first page of that study, you do realize mens journal is a publicationthats meant to make money

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More



Original Investigation | June 3, 2013 ONLINE FIRST
Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Mortality in Adventist Health Study 2 ONLINE FIRST

Michael J. Orlich, MD; Pramil N Singh, DrPH; Joan Sabaté, MD, DrPH; Karen Jaceldo-Siegl, DrPH; Jing Fan, MS; Synnove Knutsen, MD, PhD; W. Lawrence Beeson, DrPH; Gary E. Fraser, MBchB, PhD
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;():1-8. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6473.
Text Size: A A A

Published online June 3, 2013







Importance
Some evidence suggests vegetarian dietary patterns may be associated with reduced mortality, but the relationship is not well established.




40 years ago mens journal probably told you to smoke lots of cigarettes to be healthy . . .it means very little when your end outcome of persuading is to make money at whatever cost or whatever trend . .. .

especially when you skew statistics . . . .. . i mean wtf dude , dont be a schill read your studies

healthy is healthy, thats it and every body works different
 
i would unsubscribe to this thread if neosapien would start another thread with just pictures.

if you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding.

how can you have any pudding, if you don't eat your meat.
 
I've posted two studies, one involving 73,000 and the other over 120,000... both get the exact same results. Means nothing though, right? Cognitive dissonance.
 
What are you trying to say?

Answering a question with a question only means one thing. You don't have an answer, or you don't want to provide me with one. Or you know where I'm leading you, and you don't like the result.

You are weak.

[video=youtube;dyMXYE_50Ts]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyMXYE_50Ts[/video]
 
guy is just trying to find things to support his assertions, this is nothing out of the norm.....def something that can be corrected, if he wants

number one when reading any persuasive study, read carefully and objectively as to not be taken in like a common mouth breather
 
guy is just trying to find things to support his assertions, this is nothing out of the norm.....def something that can be corrected, if he wants

number one when reading any persuasive study, read carefully and objectively as to not be taken in like a common mouth breather

jtprin sucks it up like a bounty paper towel to a wet counter. mouth open the entire time.
 
Answering a question with a question only means one thing. You don't have an answer, or you don't want to provide me with one. Or you know where I'm leading you, and you don't like the result.

You are weak.

[video=youtube;dyMXYE_50Ts]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyMXYE_50Ts[/video]

No, actually, I have no idea what you're trying to say or how it disproves human physiology or studies proving that consumption of meat is linked to lower lifespan and higher risk of chronic disease. Can you answer why humans get atherosclerosis if we're carnivores?
 
No, actually, I have no idea what you're trying to say or how it disproves human physiology or studies proving that consumption of meat is linked to lower lifespan and higher risk of chronic disease.

Yes, it is quite evident you don't know what I am trying to say. Oh well. Better luck next time. I realize, for some, common sense is really hard to comprehend.
 
Yes, it is quite evident you don't know what I am trying to say. Oh well. Better luck next time. I realize, for some, common sense is really hard to comprehend.

Ad hominem argument. Can you answer why humans get atherosclerosis if we're carnivores?
 
God this thread is longer than the line outside of chik fillet on its opening day here. People where camping out in the parking lot 2 days before it opened.
 
Ad hominem argument. Can you answer why humans get atherosclerosis if we're carnivores?

lol. And all this time, I thought I was beginning to have an intelligent debate.

A debate works as follows; you make a point, then support that point with credible evidence, then we either agree or are forced to agree, in which case you "win" the debate, otherwise, after you have provided some evident to support your claim, others counter argue in kind.

You haven't achieved step 2 yet. Once you have, I will then counter argue, (which I have done), if I do not agree.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/186081

Can you explain to me why birds and some reptiles also get atherosclerosis?

http://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/174723

Or why captive animals get it?


Here is another good link to ponder. http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/we-are-not-herbivores.html#.Ue8DVWRAQSg
 
God this thread is longer than the line outside of chik fillet on its opening day here. People where camping out in the parking lot 2 days before it opened.
Can you blame them
Where else can you show you don't like fags and get a chicken sandwich at the same time?
 
Back
Top