Yea, no kidding, its like trying to get Forest Gump and Sling Blade to read a University study for once in their lives. - "Yea f*ck all them PhD's and their stupid peer reviewed studies, we know better."
Are you daft? So you're smarter than University scientists? LOL... this gets more hilarious by the minute.. > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5145862/ let me know when your peer reviewed study is published.
We already established that that was a troll joke post 3 pages ago in this thread but apparently because you're either so old, ignorant or stupid you don't know what "troll joke post" means so you are left clueless repeating it over and over again like an actual legit post like an absolute...
You're such an arrogant ass you think you know better than University studies dating back to 1982 with a bunch of outdoor trash growing in your back yard..? Fucking JOKE... get bent.
For all the shit you talk your plants look like a JOKE by the way... The fact that you even post that .jpg garbage is laughable... If I were you I'd stop that. Or at least label it properly... "an arrogant moron and his outdoor plants who's so stupid he thinks he's smarter than Global Universities."
So you're basically saying that the Cannabis plant grows different than every other single plant on earth according to miles of University empirical data? Okay. That's amazing... you have any .gov links to prove that ?
Leaves are slightly translucent, the light will pass through the entire leaf and interact with all chloroplasts; the chloroplasts that allow for photosynthesis are held in the middle of the leaf between the upper and lower epidermis, the underside of leaves can photosynthesize. Just because they...
Dude you're fucking DAFT... First you ASK for .gov University studies and then I provide them and then you continue to bash in and call me a troll... Get real... Like photosynthesis is different between cannabis plants over all other plants on Earth (lol)... take a bow moron.
Dude, you've got to be kidding... The under canopy red and blue light University stomata control studies go back to 1982... Here is peer reviewed empirical photosynthesis light under canopy data from just 4 years ago... > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5145862/
So.... all the Universities studying this under canopy lighting phenomenon and showing growth improvement are just wrong in their empirical data? So fuck .gov University empirical data? Okay got it. That makes about as much sense as you can't possibly get stronger by using steroids, humans can...
I didn't think I'd be attacked by something so trivial just because my original link was from a lighting company (with .gov University citations) when there are TONS of .gov scientific studies about it everywhere from both under canopy supplemental lighting studies increasing yields out of...
I did not mean you... I meant that towards Billy the Mountain.. I respect both of you and am sorry for me posting that idiotic light company article to begin with when I should've posted the peer reviewed one that I just did. I'm sorry.. to both of you.