A Book Review ...

ViRedd

New Member
MCCARTHYISM: THE ROSETTA STONE OF LIBERAL LIES
by Ann Coulter
November 7, 2007

When I wrote a ferocious defense of Sen. Joe McCarthy in Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism
, liberals chose not to argue with me. Instead they posted a scrolling series of reasons not to read my book, such as that I wear short skirts, date boys, and that "Treason" was not a scholarly tome.

After printing rabidly venomous accounts of McCarthy for half a century based on zero research, liberals would only accept research presenting an alternative view of McCarthy that included, as the Los Angeles Times put it, at least the "pretense of scholarly throat-clearing and objectivity."

This week, they got it. The great M. Stanton Evans has finally released Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies
. Based on a lifetime's work, including nearly a decade of thoroughgoing research, stores of original documents and never-before-seen government files, this 672-page book ends the argument on Joe McCarthy. Look for it hidden behind stacks of Bill Clinton's latest self-serving book at a bookstore near you.

Evans' book is such a tour de force that liberals are already preparing a "yesterday's news" defense -- as if they had long ago admitted the truth about McCarthy. Yes, and they fought shoulder to shoulder with Ronald Reagan to bring down the Evil Empire. Thus, Publishers Weekly preposterously claims that "the history Evans relates is already largely known, if not fully accepted." Somebody better tell George Clooney.

The McCarthy period is the Rosetta stone of all liberal lies. It is the textbook on how they rewrite history -- the sound chamber of liberal denunciations, their phony victimhood as they demean and oppress their enemies, their false imputation of dishonesty to their opponents, their legalization of every policy dispute, their ability to engage in lock-step shouting campaigns, and the black motives concealed by their endless cacophony.

The true story of Joe McCarthy, told in meticulous, irrefutable detail in "Blacklisted by History," is that from 1938 to 1946, the Democratic Party acquiesced in a monstrous conspiracy being run through the State Department, the military establishment, and even the White House to advance the Soviet cause within the U.S. government.

In the face of the Democrats' absolute refusal to admit to their fecklessness, fatuity and recklessness in allowing known Soviet spies to penetrate the deepest levels of government, McCarthy demanded an accounting.

Even if one concedes to on-the-one-hand-on-the-other-hand whiners like Ronald Radosh that Truman's Secretary of State Dean Acheson didn't like communism, his record is what it was. And that record was to treat Soviet spies like members of the Hasty Pudding Club.

Rather than own up to their moral blindness to Soviet espionage, Democrats fired up the liberal slander machine, which would be deployed again and again over the next half century to the present day. In hiding their own perfidy, liberals were guilty of every sin they lyingly imputed to McCarthy. There were no "McCarthyites" until liberals came along.

Blacklisted by History
proves that every conventional belief about McCarthy is wrong, including:

-- That he lied about his war service: He was a tailgunner in World War II;
-- That he was a drunk: He would generally nurse a single drink all night;
-- That he made the whole thing up: He produced loads of Soviet spies in government jobs;
-- That he just did it for political gain: He understood perfectly the godless evil of communism.

Ironically, for all of their love of conspiracy theories -- the rigging of the 2000 election, vote suppression in Ohio in 2004, 9/11 being an inside job, oil companies covering up miracle technology that would allow cars to run on dirt, Britney Spears' career, etc., etc. -- when presented with an actual conspiracy of Soviet spies infiltrating the U.S. government, they laughed it off like world-weary skeptics and dedicated themselves to slandering Joe McCarthy.

Then as now, liberals protect themselves from detection with wild calumnies against anybody who opposes them. They have no interest in -- or aptitude for -- persuasion. Their goal is to anathematize their enemies. Blacklisted by History
removes the curse from one of the greatest patriots in American history.

COPYRIGHT 2007 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
4520 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111
 

medicineman

New Member
There you go with the Ann Cuntler thing. I wouldn't read a word that psycho bitch wrote if it was the only reading material on the planet, and I'm sure you'd like it to be.
 

Nothing Has Changed

Active Member
"The godless evil of communism," really? There's nothing inherently evil about Marxism. It's idiotic, but evil is a stretch. I can't wait until I hear about the godless evil of Buddhism. Be sure to post that.
 

ViRedd

New Member
"The godless evil of communism," really? There's nothing inherently evil about Marxism. It's idiotic, but evil is a stretch. I can't wait until I hear about the godless evil of Buddhism. Be sure to post that.
Right ... its the application that's evil.

On the other hand, communistic governments have only murdered in excess of 200,000,000 people over the past 100 years. Maybe we should give it another chance.

Vi
 

medicineman

New Member
communistic governments

That is the problem with communism, the governments. A pure form of communism would not be so political. I dont like any of the examples heretofore forced upon the citizens, and it would take a visit from the diety to make it work, but communism is pretty much the scenario layed out for Heaven, no?
 

ViRedd

New Member
"but communism is pretty much the scenario layed out for Heaven, no?"

I don't imagine that "ego" would exist in Heaven, therefore there wouldn't be a need for an economic system.

Vi
 

medicineman

New Member
"but communism is pretty much the scenario layed out for Heaven, no?"

I don't imagine that "ego" would exist in Heaven, therefore there wouldn't be a need for an economic system.

Vi
Pure communism doesnt require economics, just the barter system. Everyone does what he can do to help everyone else and in the process, he helps himself, that is the view of communism-socialism I adhere to, not the repressive governments. It is an altered form of heaven, you have to work or be unable to work to make the system be stable. It's never been tried on a grand scale without repressive governments getting involved. The communes I lived in in the 60s-70s were a form of this, but someones ego always fucked it up, the human dillema. I have approached zero ego a few times in my higher states of mind, but never pure, as I think VI may be right, you cannot achieve that on this plane, mother earth. If you reach this, you die, move into the next realm. The closest I came was at the end of the silver cord, that was close.
 

ViRedd

New Member
I believe one can reach an egoless state in world. In order to to it, one would have to exist in this world, but live in the spiritual world. One CAN attain the State of Grace, where ego dies, and yet, remain in the physical world. Its not easy staying on that enlightened path though ... as the world continually tries to knock us off of it. Like its been said: "The wages of sin is death." I think they were referring to spiritual death.

Vi
 

medicineman

New Member
I believe one can reach an egoless state in world. In order to to it, one would have to exist in this world, but live in the spiritual world. One CAN attain the State of Grace, where ego dies, and yet, remain in the physical world. Its not easy staying on that enlightened path though ... as the world continually tries to knock us off of it. Like its been said: "The wages of sin is death." I think they were referring to spiritual death.

Vi
There are a few exceptions, Budda, Krishna, and a few Indian chiefs and India indians. But to make a living and maintain a state of grace would be pretty hard. Just think you couldn't come on this site and bullshit the people, you'd be way too high for that.
 

may

Well-Known Member
Pure communism doesnt require economics, just the barter system. Everyone does what he can do to help everyone else and in the process, he helps himself, that is the view of communism-socialism I adhere to,.
I have taken you far to lightly med.. I now understand your game and its truly a thing of beauty. You have taken the truism [ Ignorance is Bliss ] and have tried to lead all that you could into this state of BLISS and you help all the others by helping them to hone their wits on the whetstones of your ignorant threads.

Well done med. I salute you! You truly HAVE helped everyone else in this process, and you have i'm sure helped to lead a few towards this state of ignorant bliss.

I have used this type of manipulation from the age of 7 or 8, I must admit I still find it funny at times when I push someone in one direction knowing that they will go the other way because of their aversion to being pushed .
This is one of the easiest forms of manipulation to learn.

For me any form of manipulation MUST be for the good of the manipulated and the manipulater must pay for the manipulation and even using the crude form as above, its application should be very subtile.,
 

medicineman

New Member
I have taken you far to lightly med.. I now understand your game and its truly a thing of beauty. You have taken the truism [ Ignorance is Bliss ] and have tried to lead all that you could into this state of BLISS and you help all the others by helping them to hone their wits on the whetstones of your ignorant threads.

Well done med. I salute you! You truly HAVE helped everyone else in this process, and you have i'm sure helped to lead a few towards this state of ignorant bliss.

I have used this type of manipulation from the age of 7 or 8, I must admit I still find it funny at times when I push someone in one direction knowing that they will go the other way because of their aversion to being pushed .
This is one of the easiest forms of manipulation to learn.

For me any form of manipulation MUST be for the good of the manipulated and the manipulater must pay for the manipulation and even using the crude form as above, its application should be very subtile.,
Sig heil comrade, I'll see you at the party headquarters. After all, I'm one of the anointed,~LOL~, you are so easy.
 

may

Well-Known Member
communistic governments

That is the problem with communism, the governments. A pure form of communism would not be so political. I dont like any of the examples heretofore forced upon the citizens, and it would take a visit from the diety to make it work, but communism is pretty much the scenario layed out for Heaven, no?
By that line of thinking North Korea must be Heaven, kim jong ll hasn't just visited hes a diety that lives there.
 

may

Well-Known Member
Right ... its the application that's evil.

On the other hand, communistic governments have only murdered in excess of 200,000,000 people over the past 100 years. Maybe we should give it another chance.

Vi
Now Vi you know most of those were starved and /or worked to death. Not as you say murdered.
 

medicineman

New Member
Now Vi you know most of those were starved and /or worked to death. Not as you say murdered.
So May, am I right in assuming you are a capitalist pig, or just a pig period. Your unabated assault on me is typical of inferior intellect. I am up for it as you can see. Communism requires (The true and only form I applaud) complete loss of overbearing egos like yours, The I've got mine, fuck you scenario that is exhibited by the likes of your ilk, is the path straight into the fiery pit. I am not a proponent of Governments like all those in the past that have warped the true tenents of communism into a dictatorial police state, whereas you are for the Capitalistic fascist police state as is being formed in America as we speak. Anyway, it really doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things, two individuals cannot change one damn thing about this government, so we are just having a pissing contest. Although I view Capitalism as an evil form of government, rewarding those with the most wealth and abandoning the least of us to their own demise, I realize that in this country, it will be the dominant form, as this is the most greedy country on the planet.
 

may

Well-Known Member
So May, am I right in assuming you are a capitalist pig, or just a pig period. Your unabated assault on me is typical of inferior intellect. I am up for it as you can see. Communism requires (The true and only form I applaud) complete loss of overbearing egos like yours, The I've got mine, fuck you scenario that is exhibited by the likes of your ilk, is the path straight into the fiery pit. I am not a proponent of Governments like all those in the past that have warped the true tenents of communism into a dictatorial police state, whereas you are for the Capitalistic fascist police state as is being formed in America as we speak. Anyway, it really doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things, two individuals cannot change one damn thing about this government, so we are just having a pissing contest. Although I view Capitalism as an evil form of government, rewarding those with the most wealth and abandoning the least of us to their own demise, I realize that in this country, it will be the dominant form, as this is the most greedy country on the planet.
I posted to Vi as he went a bit past the truth, not that his point couldn't be well supported.and the simple truth in most ways.... But murder is a legal term and he would need to prove malice aforethought.

You see my post to Vi as part of my unabated assault on you?
You assume too much, when you don't seem to be able to understand the facts right in front of you, assuming will only lead you further astray/awry from the truth.

Governments are not evil although some tenents or parts may be. Evil or bad things come from the people who operate the government. So please understand that the good nature of a human doesn't come from the government and for the most part evil is native or learned from someone/something other than the government.
So please understand that if I say that a government is evil than I would be speaking of the humans operating said government.

You show true stupidty saying that the US is the most greedy country, when the truth is it is by far the most giving however you wish to look at it.

What country has given more of its wealth or its blood for the good of the world?

If someone wishes for wealth he will watch over his wealth much as a good shepherd watches over his sheep alowing his flock to grow, thereby growing his wealth.
A bad shepherd will not spend the time watching his flock and spend more time devouring the sheep from his flock and as time goes on the flock becomes one then none.
I ask you, who would you want to watch YOUR sheep?
 

ViRedd

New Member
Ahh, yes ... like many socialists who have come before Med, if only THEY were in charge, they could make communism work. Yeppers, these people are true idealists ... idealists from Hell.

Here's what Med readily admits:

"Communism requires (The true and only form I applaud) complete loss of overbearing egos like yours..."

But like all dictatorial schemers, they never take into account that those in charge would have to FORCE the suppression of ego. Ego is part of human nature. Ego accounts for the survival instinct. Ego is what causes us to want what is best for ourselves and our families.

Med's faulty idealism is the type of idealism that has accounted for millions of miserable lives throughout the ages. As I've said many times before in this forum, I only wish Med and others who think like him would be honest enough to call what they espouse by its proper name. And that name is SLAVERY.

Vi
 

may

Well-Known Member
Ahh, yes ... like many socialists who have come before Med, if only THEY were in charge, they could make communism work. Yeppers, these people are true idealists ... idealists from Hell.

Here's what Med readily admits:

"Communism requires (The true and only form I applaud) complete loss of overbearing egos like yours..."

But like all dictatorial schemers, they never take into account that those in charge would have to FORCE the suppression of ego. Ego is part of human nature. Ego accounts for the survival instinct. Ego is what causes us to want what is best for ourselves and our families.

Med's faulty idealism is the type of idealism that has accounted for millions of miserable lives throughout the ages. As I've said many times before in this forum, I only wish Med and others who think like him would be honest enough to call what they espouse by its proper name. And that name is SLAVERY.

Vi
Yes this is backwards the state should be a slave to the people, [NOT] the people are slaves to the state.
 

medicineman

New Member
Yes this is backwards the state should be a slave to the people, [NOT] the people are slaves to the state.
And how many times have I said that My ideals of socialism would not be possible with the current state of humanity. Government involvement always corrupts the ideals. Power hungry egoists always assume command and start suppressing the populace. The human psyche is not ready for pure socialism and probably wont be for at least 200 years. Capitalism and it's evil reward the greedy system, will play out in time, as soon as the proletariate get wise to the workings of the program. The thing is, if you give them just enough to be semi-comfortable, TV and Fast food, you can scam them pretty well. The thing that is happening now is the demise of the middle class, and that will eventually lead to overthrowing the Capitalist pigs. But untill a higher sense of humanity sets in you'll have: "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss". The thing that people don't realize is with the death of about a thousand individuals, the top elites, we could take control of the government. It is easy to kill them one at a time. You just have to locate them and walk right up and zero them out.
 

ViRedd

New Member
"The thing that people don't realize is with the death of about a thousand individuals, the top elites, we could take control of the government. It is easy to kill them one at a time. You just have to locate them and walk right up and zero them out."

Yeppers, right out of the Lenin, Mao and Marx handbook. Hey Med ... do you still wave The Little Red Book?



Vi
 
Top