Are some people geneticly superior and are others less evolved?

Thanks for the reply darth. Here is the evolution timeline link http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://churchofcriticalthinking.org/images/missinglinkdebate.jpg&imgrefurl=http://churchofcriticalthinking.org/missing_link.html&h=305&w=848&sz=58&tbnid=ayKq3NA5wzrT_M:&tbnh=52&tbnw=145&prev=/images%3Fq%3Devolution%2Bof%2Bman%2Btimeline&zoom=1&q=evolution+of+man+timeline&hl=en&usg=__kxbeMqooTe4EFRQJQNXLNePrej0=&sa=X&ei=Q-GMTOLbDcKC8ga6rcz1CQ&ved=0CCwQ9QEwBA. You wonder why they have still not found the missing link? Found tons of austrelopithicus tons of java man and homo erectus and neandertal but not one missing link. Because IMO it doesnt exist. They have only found walking monkeys incapable of speech or fire until a wink of an eye ago in evolutionary terms. Chech this out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiLnfyfh-3s&feature=related The star child is trippy but i think your right about the deformity. Otherwise it would be a missing link in my favor haha. Sure we are going to have dna of homo erectus we were combined with them in a test tube. Evolution doesnt move that quick to go from a 600 cc brain to an 1800 cc brain in 50,000. years right? Please Look at the timeline. These Annunaki Were superhumen and we were created in their image according to the Sumerian tablets.
 
Twistedfunk said:
Arnold is a world class idiot of the Elitist Class. He is far from superior. If the world's elite families are inbreeding then they will likely kill their own line when they all pop out deformed. Most of the elite caste marriage setups were to continue royal blood without inbreeding but that's just "royal blood". They never had enough understanding of genetics to breed certain traits for a certain purpose in people. It was borderline mysticism. I don't see how having generations of inbreeding people that have an average reasoning ability could be considered genetic superiority. It would only work in a vacuum anyway since there is too much genetic variation and people can be unpredictable with whom they choose to mate with.

Hitler thought a lot about genetic superiority but failed in basic reasoning. Answers to your questions about genetics and evolution can be found on other more reputable and informative sites. Nature is the best proof though. There are plenty of instances on our planet where a known organism has been stuck in a very different environment than what would be "normal" and entire new ecosystems and species have evolved as a result.

Our world is constantly changing and with it so are our perceptions of what is "superior".

Haze: If you are suggesting that everyone has the same ability for athleticism as Brock Lesnar, then you are probably deluding your self. If the switch isn't turned on in your genetic make-up, it simply isn't possible for you. That's like saying someone who is 5ft tall can easily become 7ft tall if they just work hard enough.
Click to expand...

if that the comparison that you want to make is extremely moronic. A thing like that has to do with pass down through genes passed down from one family member to the next.And to answer your question YES it can be possible for ANYONE excluding cripples and retards to become like Brock lesner What do you think he just popped out like that he trained for that shit he didn't just sit his ass on the sofa he lifted weights and shit to get like that genetic superiority doesn't have a thing to do with it period.
 
Actualy I thought about this alot, especialy with the abolition of the death penalty, we are realy screwing with the genepool.
The good and the mild, end up dead, and the offenders end up with coital visits. This seems to be counter to all of man's history.
 
ANC said:
Actualy I thought about this alot, especialy with the abolition of the death penalty, we are realy screwing with the genepool.
The good and the mild, end up dead, and the offenders end up with coital visits. This seems to be counter to all of man's history.
Click to expand...

could your elaborate on that i don't quite understand what point you trying to get through and yet its intriguing me.
 
I believe we have offspring that are similar to us, and have similar predispositions. I know the establishment tries to convince everybody how special and unique you are, but I wil wager more that you end up being your dad, than not.
The people being targeted for a robery would normaly have something for a start, which tends to indicate a propensity for hard work, reliabilty, etc... We loose the better of the two types, and the surviving gets to replicate itself, further srcewing with the ratio of good to bad in the genepool.
 
ANC said:
I believe we have offspring that are similar to us, and have similar predispositions. I know the establishment tries to convince everybody how special and unique you are, but I wil wager more that you end up being your dad, than not.
The people being targeted for a robery would normaly have something for a start, which tends to indicate a propensity for hard work, reliabilty, etc... We loose the better of the two types, and the surviving gets to replicate itself, further srcewing with the ratio of good to bad in the genepool.
Click to expand...

but when you came down to good and evil the no proof that one is genetically predisposiotioned for violence or crime and that atrosoties its all a mixture of will power,enviorment,and paritally the way you were brung up i can say that from personal experence to commit the act of any violent crime there has to be a breaking point and not and genetic make.Here's thehome worn
http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1841
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Apostatize
ChemDawg, OG Kush, Triangle Kush, Kush Mints
2
Replies
23
Views
3K
Apostatize
Apostatize
B
Curing
Replies
9
Views
818
Jonesfamily7715
J
O
Commercial cultivator, personal grower. AMA
Replies
0
Views
482
Onyxxa
O
R
Iowa still with Reefer Madness
Replies
10
Views
1K
BullPower
BullPower
S
Newbie question about preserving genetics.
Replies
4
Views
921
conor c
conor c
Back
Top