Assange the rapist headed to face the music

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
No, comma, stupid, I'm defending the concept of DUE PROCESS.

As usual, you're more than willing to throw such details under the bus in your headlong rush to 'justice', especially if it serves a partisan interest.

Incredibly short sighted, nevermind self serving.
Click to expand...
You just posited that his rape victims were lying about getting raped in order to frame assange

That’s not due process

That’s a conspiracy that belongs on infowars in defense of Putin’s propaganda peddler

Now accuse everyone else of being a republican
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
You just posited that his rape victims were lying about getting raped in order to frame assange

That’s not due process

That’s a conspiracy that belongs on infowars in defense of Putin’s propaganda peddler

Now accuse everyone else of being a republican
Click to expand...
It's a viable defense that may or may not hold up in court, BASED ON THE EVIDENCE.

Why don't you just shitcan the whole Constitution while you're at it?

You sound more and more Republican every day.
 
tangerinegreen555

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Lame ass attempt at a strawman argument.

Do you seriously think like that?
Click to expand...
Oh look, another so called progressive who posts YT vids for rock solid objective unspun pure proof.

How many doors did you knock on in 2016? How long did you work at the polls? What do you actually do for change besides talk about it?

Either one of you guys actually work or is it all fun and kinky games and an occasional dream?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i knocked about 800 or so doors and made a few thousand calls while tty sat at home calling her shillary, even as the polls showed her up by only 1% or so

i knew what a threat trump was, tty didn;t care
 
tangerinegreen555

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i knocked about 800 or so doors and made a few thousand calls while tty sat at home calling her shillary, even as the polls showed her up by only 1% or so

i knew what a threat trump was, tty didn;t care
Click to expand...
Yeah, why care?

He must like ultra conservative SCOTUS picks. Trump doesn't even care about Roe vs. Wade anymore. Just wants the guy who thinks a president can't be indicted.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
tangerinegreen555 said:
Oh look, another so called progressive who posts YT vids for rock solid objective unspun pure proof.

How many doors did you knock on in 2016? How long did you work at the polls? What do you actually do for change besides talk about it?

Either one of you guys actually work or is it all fun and kinky games and an occasional dream?
Click to expand...
Hey, how about that party that doesn't give a fuck about you or me, anyway?

You know, the one that completely ignores the fire, life and death needs of 90% of all Americans in its zeal to service that tiny minority that showers it with money?

How IS that working out for you, anyway?

Well, not worth a damn for me or anyone I know, so why should I be loyal to it?

Answer me THAT and you'll understand why I want a real alternative, not a fake competition where all the candidates in both sides are bought and paid for.

Cheer on your master's choice all you want- but don't whine at me for not going along with the charade.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i knocked about 800 or so doors and made a few thousand calls while tty sat at home calling her shillary, even as the polls showed her up by only 1% or so

i knew what a threat trump was, tty didn;t care
Click to expand...
Yep, that party.

The one that doesn't give a fuck about me or 90% of all Americans.

Do tell us more about them.
 
TacoMac

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
No, comma, stupid, I'm defending the concept of DUE PROCESS..
Click to expand...
No, you're not.

You're defending a criminal who has COMPLETELY CIRCUMVENTED DUE PROCESS BY HIDING IN A FOREIGN EMBASSY.

Again, when you do that, you have in effect admitted your own guilt. Otherwise, he would have been like Morgan Freeman and charged head long into it all and PROVEN his innocence.
 
Buddha2525

Buddha2525

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
No, you're not.

You're defending a criminal who has COMPLETELY CIRCUMVENTED DUE PROCESS BY HIDING IN A FOREIGN EMBASSY.

Again, when you do that, you have in effect admitted your own guilt. Otherwise, he would have been like Morgan Freeman and charged head long into it all and PROVEN his innocence.
Click to expand...
Did Morgan Freeman do something that embarrassed a whole country's elite who would love nothing more than you dead?
 
TacoMac

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
Buddha2525 said:
Did Morgan Freeman do something that embarrassed a whole country's elite who would love nothing more than you dead?
Click to expand...
No. Neither did Assange. He was simply wanted for questioning in a sexual assault case at the time.

He ran to an embassy to avoid it.

The whole Wikileaks thing didn't happen until nearly a year later.
 
tangerinegreen555

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Hey, how about that party that doesn't give a fuck about you or me, anyway?

You know, the one that completely ignores the fire, life and death needs of 90% of all Americans in its zeal to service that tiny minority that showers it with money?

How IS that working out for you, anyway?

Well, not worth a damn for me or anyone I know, so why should I be loyal to it?

Answer me THAT and you'll understand why I want a real alternative, not a fake competition where all the candidates in both sides are bought and paid for.

Cheer on your master's choice all you want- but don't whine at me for not going along with the charade.
Click to expand...
But you didn't answer my SCOTUS question. What a surprise!

Actually question(s), as I've mentioned it dozens of times.

Are you stumped?
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
No, you're not.

You're defending a criminal who has COMPLETELY CIRCUMVENTED DUE PROCESS BY HIDING IN A FOREIGN EMBASSY.

Again, when you do that, you have in effect admitted your own guilt. Otherwise, he would have been like Morgan Freeman and charged head long into it all and PROVEN his innocence.
Click to expand...
No I'm defending due process.

Let's see what he's actually guilty if.

That's how the system works.

Only authoritarians want to circumvent Justice.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Buddha2525 said:
I don't get this point of this thread's OP at all.

Julian Assange helped reform the wrong position in the military, besides the whole world domination nightmare, that they have no business regulating sexual behavior, i.e. with Chelsea Manning exposing horrendous war crimes.

But complain and have a stick up their butt for "crimes" that were dropped, while forgetting about there were actual crimes exposed that were covered up. That without those two, these real crimes our government does wouldn't have seen the light of day.

I mean, huh?
Click to expand...
Huh? is right. Get your facts straight, man.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assange_v_Swedish_Prosecution_Authority

Accusations
Assange was arrested in his absence and wanted for questioning in relation to accusations against him of rape and sexual molestation. This was the first step in the criminal prosecution procedure in Sweden, and only after the questioning would the prosecution authority be able to formally indict him.

A totally innocent man spends years in an Ecuadoran UK embassy under asylum. Ummmhuuummm, right.

Sweden dropped some charges. Not because they have reason to think he's innocent -- the statute of limitations for those charges ran out. The most serious charges remain open. They rescinded the arrest warrant but charges remain.

Inquiry into three of the allegations dropped
On 12 August 2015, Swedish prosecutors announced that, as the statute of limitations for the less serious allegations had run out, and they had not succeeded in interviewing Assange, they would end part of their preliminary investigation. After 18 August 2015, Assange could no longer be charged for any of the three less serious charges. However, the preliminary investigation into the more serious allegation remained open as the statute of limitations for this charge was not expected to expire until 2020.[37] Swedish authorities interviewed Assange on this allegation in November 2016.[38]

Revocation of arrest warrant
On 19 May 2017, the Swedish chief prosecutor applied to the Stockholm District Court to rescind the arrest warrant for Julian Assange,[39] effectively ceasing their investigation against Julian Assange.[40] The case may be reinstated until the expiration of the statute of limitations. Additionally, Britain's arrest warrant pertaining to bail violations remains open.

Oh yeah, the bail thing. He jumped bail and left his supporters holding the bag.

This has nothing to do with Snowden.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
tangerinegreen555 said:
But you didn't answer my SCOTUS question. What a surprise!

Actually question(s), as I've mentioned it dozens of times.

Are you stumped?
Click to expand...
Somehow I'm just not buying innovation that Democrats would have nominated a pro union judge for the post. After all, they skipped so many chances to do so in the past.

Tell us again how your party gives a fuck about average Americans while taking millions from the donor class?

Because I'm not seeing it.

Your smokescreen isn't helping.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top