Audrey 1 (my first grow log - comments/help welcome)

Keep on Truckin'
 

Attachments

  • DSC02533.jpg
    DSC02533.jpg
    66.8 KB · Views: 19
  • DSC02535.jpg
    DSC02535.jpg
    62.6 KB · Views: 8
  • DSC02538.jpg
    DSC02538.jpg
    48.2 KB · Views: 15
  • DSC02540.jpg
    DSC02540.jpg
    79.1 KB · Views: 12
...another update...
 

Attachments

  • DSC02548.jpg
    DSC02548.jpg
    66.2 KB · Views: 9
  • DSC02547.jpg
    DSC02547.jpg
    59.3 KB · Views: 13
  • DSC02546.jpg
    DSC02546.jpg
    42 KB · Views: 12
  • DSC02545.jpg
    DSC02545.jpg
    64 KB · Views: 27
  • DSC02549.jpg
    DSC02549.jpg
    80.5 KB · Views: 20
..rockin' like Chris Crocker..
 

Attachments

  • DSC02550.jpg
    DSC02550.jpg
    69.1 KB · Views: 10
  • DSC02551.jpg
    DSC02551.jpg
    53.2 KB · Views: 6
  • DSC02552.jpg
    DSC02552.jpg
    51.5 KB · Views: 10
  • DSC02554.jpg
    DSC02554.jpg
    83.5 KB · Views: 11
  • DSC02557.jpg
    DSC02557.jpg
    40.7 KB · Views: 3
  • DSC02556.jpg
    DSC02556.jpg
    49.8 KB · Views: 10
..paying dues like Parker Lewis because Parker Lewis cant lose... know what I'm saying?
 

Attachments

  • DSC02558.jpg
    DSC02558.jpg
    49.4 KB · Views: 15
  • DSC02559.jpg
    DSC02559.jpg
    66 KB · Views: 13
  • DSC02561.jpg
    DSC02561.jpg
    87.2 KB · Views: 12
mo pictures
 

Attachments

  • DSC02562.jpg
    DSC02562.jpg
    65.7 KB · Views: 13
  • DSC02563.jpg
    DSC02563.jpg
    45.3 KB · Views: 18
  • DSC02564.jpg
    DSC02564.jpg
    85 KB · Views: 10
  • DSC02565.jpg
    DSC02565.jpg
    68.7 KB · Views: 16
  • DSC02567.jpg
    DSC02567.jpg
    52 KB · Views: 6
  • DSC02566.jpg
    DSC02566.jpg
    57.4 KB · Views: 15
You're right watts don't mean anything to plants, but neither do lumens. People use them as a way of loosely guaging how much light they have, without a meter watts seems the easiest. Most bulbs (of similar type) have comparable outputs/per watt, so watts, although irrelevent to the plant do provide a way to guage. That being said lumens can be used equally, neither really gives any usable information...but we need something to use :confused:

Well, both of these are sort of half-truths. Watts and lumens can both matter and they are sort of related, but only loosely. A massively intense UV/blue lamp, for example, could have a huge amount of power (watts), a fair bit of which could be absorbed by a plant (PAR Watts - Photosynthetic Active Region), but very little of which a human could see (very few lumens). This is why MH lamps have a lower number of lumens compared to HPS but actually have a higher number of PAR watts (useful to plants) than an HPS - only because the human eye sees more of what HPS puts out compared to what MH puts out.

Lumens and watts/m^2 can add when you add bulbs as well, but only in the places where the light from both lamps overlap. The closer together you can put your lamps (closer to a point-source approximation) the more lumen stacking you can do. Still, it's an uphill battle of sorts and there's no simple maths to figure out what you've got.

The best measure is PAR watts, which is a power equivalent of what lumens are to human intensity perception, but specific to what a plant will absorb. PAR watts tells you how many watts in your spectrum are available for plant usage. A bright green light would have high lumens, but very low PAR watts, for example. Blue and red lights have much higher PAR watts but would provide far fewer lumens...if that makes sense.

For the mathematicians/physicists - essentially lumens are a sort of integration over the multiplied spectrums of the lamp output and the absorption spectrum of the eye. PAR wattts are the same sort of integrated value, but with the power spectrum of the lamp and the absorption spectrums of the photsynthetic molecules. For HPS and MH, since they're so widely used and since the spectrums don't change, people have just figured out what luminous intensity you need from those spectrums to get good plant growth. But to say you need 10,000 lumens implies 10,000 lumens from a specific type of lamp. If you had a hypothetical lamp that was specifically matched to photosynthetic absorption then you would need far fewer lumens to achieve the same amount of energy transfer to the plant. Not all lumens are created equal.

Not sure if that makes any sense, but at least when it comes to CFL, you basically need all the light you can get. No matter how many lamps you have, you can probably benefit from a few more - I've yet to see a CFL grow that really makes monster plants like HID lighting does. Anyone with examples otherwise, mind you, I'd love to see how it was done!
 
..world keeps on spinnin'..
 

Attachments

  • DSC02570.jpg
    DSC02570.jpg
    58.2 KB · Views: 16
  • DSC02571.jpg
    DSC02571.jpg
    70.7 KB · Views: 15
  • DSC02573.jpg
    DSC02573.jpg
    71.8 KB · Views: 7
  • DSC02574.jpg
    DSC02574.jpg
    51.3 KB · Views: 16
  • DSC02577.jpg
    DSC02577.jpg
    58.1 KB · Views: 19
  • DSC02578.jpg
    DSC02578.jpg
    74.5 KB · Views: 19
whats with the rainbow pistils :O

looks damn tasty to me like some kind of berrylisciouse flavour? you getting much odor from the ladies yet?

get some lighting to the side of em even if you are using cfl, fan leaves will be shadowing the lower nodes

sweet grow
 
Back
Top