Mr Neutron
Well-Known Member
Ron Paul doesn't care about black people.
Dan Kone hates freedom.
Ron Paul doesn't care about black people.
Racist against black people? Is that the only racism there is?do you really think reverend wright is racist?
when i finally sat down and listened to the sermons years later, i heard him speaking out AGAINST racism. he cited interrment of the japanese, jim crow laws, and the like when he said "god damn america".
tell me what you think of reverend wright, and if his speeches are indeed racist.
Ron Paul cares about everyone equally, unlike you who insists on special favors for certain people based on looks or affiliation. Ron Paul doesn't make his decisions based on 1 group. He believes in freedom and liberty for everyone equally. No group should be placed above or given special favors over another.Ron Paul doesn't care about black people.
I don't think that's correct. He said something along the lines of "he's like an opinionated uncle that he doesn't always agree with".Obama is responsible for everything he has ever written or had ghost written for him. When the allegations about Rev. Wright came out (listen to the whole speech from Wright about racism in america) Obama quit the church and Disavowed Wright.
Ron Paul is responsible for what he has published. Even Ron Paul sheepishly has admitted he is responsible.
First off it's the job of the editor not the publisher. Second thing, Ron Paul wasn't involved with the newsletter. You don't even know who is in charge so quit pointing fingers.Depends. If I have a magazine and my employee writes a offensive article then it is up to me to not publish it. If i do then i am just as responsible for the reprehensible article as said employee.
So how can Ron Pauls employee be secretly racist if he openly writes racist shit? And how can Ron Paul not be responsible if he allows it to be published?
What makes him an idiot? Was he an idiot when he voted against the Housing Bill that ruined the economy. He told us the exact reasons why the economy would crash and he was correct.Not being a racist doesn't change the fact that the guy's an unelectable idiot.
The other poster is right. The editor is responsible. that's his job. Quit making things up. Go ask someone in the business, they'll tell you the facts so you wont continue sounding like an uniformed teenager.Yes the publisher is responsible for the content, unless they make a disclaimer to the affect
" The publisher is not responsible for the opinions of the author"
Is there any proof he wrote them. Guilty until proven innocent, right? You don't solve problems very well.Was there any disclaimer that the opinions are solely that of the author?
Wait was there anything in the newsletters that even suggested the author was none other than Ron Paul?
Everything he's ever said and stood for. lmao you really don't know much about Ron Paul so why comment?So what would lead the readers of the Ron Paul Newsletters to think that the opinion was not that of Ron Paul?
That's a lie. You have no proof of this either.that is especially true because they were written in the first person and ron paul defended them as his own writings during the 1996 congressional campaign.
No, not last year. When the writings first came to his attention. If you had followed politics in the 2007 election it came up then. But you were probably in elementary school then. How come you don't know that yet automatically think he did? Even though everything he's stood for has been the opposite of what's in those articles?When exactly did Ron Paul state that they werent his opinions?
last year?
So the important thing to you is it wasn't 20 years it was less? You miss the important point and deflect as usual. You cannot solve problems and get the correct answer when you continue to nitpick in order to be right instead of looking for the truth on what is important.decades?
a decade is 10 years, so your claim is that he has been denying the newsletters for 20 years or more.
16 years ago, he claimed he wrote the newsletters.
16 < 20
your explanation does not comport with reality.
can you find a video or newspaper from 1992 or before where he denied writing them?
I talked with some black people and they said they don't even care if ron paul is racist, they're still voting for him cause they know he wouldn't force any of his belief on them.
Seems people would rather have someone say they believe in one thing then do another. It's what a person believes that really counts.
I'll have a transparent presidency and allow everyone to write on the white house forum site before I approve or veto. But the bill before his desk is signed and never goes to the forum talk.
I won't allow federal funds to be used against medical states. Then you liberal jackasses excuse it saying he would commit reelection suicide? It's worse he lied. He has no recourse? He can fire Eric Holder you morons!
I promise the Olympics to Chicago. Too hilarious, no need to say more.
I will close Guantanamo! Haha. Cause he's so against torture.
I will veto the NDAA. Really? Cause you so respect freedom and liberty. He ain't no dictator, bitches!
I promise new jobs. **Crickets**
No, really this time I mean it. .... Shakes head.
One of my first actions will be to take the troops in Iraq home. That one's not really a lie, huh? He hasn't done shit, but three years later does it. Great job!
I promise! I promise! I promise! I.... Obama's 2012 campaign slogan.
unelectable
I don't think that's correct. He said something along the lines of "he's like an opinionated uncle that he doesn't always agree with".
Ron Paul wasn't active in the newsletter when those articles were published. Obama was still going to the church when Rev Wrights hate rhetoric was going around.
I posted this in another thread. Here is the entire speech of Wrights not just the "goddamn america part"
Well other than the HIV was created to kill blacksWow the entire speech eh? That sure was a short one.