Is this always true?? Would it really make a difference if I had plants in a 25 gallon pot compared to a 50 or even a 100 gallon pot?
Is this always true?? Would it really make a difference if I had plants in a 25 gallon pot compared to a 50 or even a 100 gallon pot?
this thread should have been named "bigger the pot, bigger the pot?" haha
lmaooo foreall! haha im thinkin of 25 to 50 gallon pots outdoor..what plays a role in fire ass outdoor ??
For years I've heard "for every foot of expected growth you want one gallon of soil." My Indicas average 5 feet and Sativas average 6 feet. I really like 10 gallon fabric grow pots. Larger pots are nice, but as far as I can tell, it just means less watering and fertilizing. Is anyone here getting 7ft Indicas and 10ft Sativas?
This question is really a no-brainer to botanists. They know that the canopy above ground is equal roughly to the root mass below ground.
all my plants are 12 to 15 feet some even 20 and all are indica.
all my plants are 12 to 15 feet some even 20 and all are indica. My dad was growing 20 foot pure afghan back in the 80's and early 90's.
Smaller pots smaller harvest. its a fact. The biggest plants i have seen are in the ground and they are the biggest because they have unlimited space for roots to grow. you can grow a 6 foot plant in a 5 gallon pot but wont put out shit compared to my plants in my 100 gal. or 200 gal. pots.