Club 315w lec

With the sunplix, their ballast uses a normal digital/mag hps/Mh plug, the Phantom uses a totally different plug type. I was hoping to just do a bulb and ballast swap, and add a new hood to the flower room. Not run all new wires.

DemonTrich said:

With the sunplix, their ballast uses a normal digital/mag hps/Mh plug, the Phantom uses a totally different plug type. I was hoping to just do a bulb and ballast swap, and add a new hood to the flower room. Not run all new wires.

Click to expand...

they sell a hyrdofarm to "s" type adapter, for the phantoms but then u need to add the 10-15$ per adapter. adds up quick

DemonTrich said:

With the sunplix, their ballast uses a normal digital/mag hps/Mh plug, the Phantom uses a totally different plug type. I was hoping to just do a bulb and ballast swap, and add a new hood to the flower room. Not run all new wires.

Click to expand...

thccbdhealth said:

whats the price per unit?

Click to expand...

i got mine for 215ea.

I hope I come across a deal like that in my travels around the world wide web.....
I can drive into Dakota but I don't know what good that would do me for finding one

love the time of purchase.

so the Phantom being sold now is the second model and is good to go?
am I wrong to think Nanolux is the better Technology and "Name" behind them?
wouldn't a 315 Nanolux in a 4x4 tent be adequately cooled with a 420 cfm circulation that's air volume circulated every 15 seconds?...

cant really make that out, but looks like 2200 for 5 lights?

thccbdhealth said:

so the Phantom being sold now is the second model and is good to go?
am I wrong to think Nanolux is the better Technology and "Name" behind them?
wouldn't a 315 Nanolux in a 4x4 tent be adequately cooled with a 420 cfm circulation that's air volume circulated every 15 seconds?...

Click to expand...

If the ballast being on it doesnt bother u then, yes i would pick nanolux over sunplix..... then again might be because i got the CEO's cell number, LOL,


ps. but seriously the 400cfm will be more then enuff for the 315, but not enuff for a 630.

well fuck me, I'm that New, I don't Even Know - if you on good terms with him, Ask him if he has interest in reaching the Canadian Market. I've had a hard time finding a dealer for there fixtures or anyone other then Gavita around here....so I'm left with bghydro

I thought they put off less heat then a 600 hps and a better spectrum, better quality and the same yield but usually the ballast is outside the tent or located on the wall?


the Nanolux is the alternative model over a 6oow hps cool tube or a gavita 6/750 flex both from the local shop

5 hoods, ballast, lamps, sockets,and rachets for 2200 after tax.

wa

thccbdhealth said:

I thought they put off less heat then a 600 hps and a better spectrum, better quality and the same yield but usually the ballast is outside the tent or located on the wall?


the Nanolux is the alternative model over a 6oow hps cool tube or a gavita 6/750 flex both from the local shop

Click to expand...

the gravita can run 630DE i believe.
nvm they are not compatable...
go with the nanolux, Hps are nice but wat more unefficent, the DE's produce even more heat with same unefficency ( damn i need spellcheck)

yah I first wondered that aswell.... and the price point on the gavita is lower, but hot-spot i've been told, and bulbs designed to run hot, and the fixture is high frequency


and ive read the bulb life isn't as long, that's where the fixture with multiple 315's came into play, from what ive been reading on here

this will be my first real setup, and the nanolux (610) seamed to be the best choice to be had - at the price of a 600w hps cooltube (430) , and $70 cheeper then the Gavita 6/750 flex



so a single nanolux 315 I'm in 610.00
the 630 i'm in 950.00

thccbdhealth said:

this will be my first real setup, and the nanolux (610) seamed to be the best choice to be had - at the price of a 600w hps cooltube (430) , and $70 cheeper then the Gavita 6/750 flex

Click to expand...

u will save the diffence in wattage alone in your first veg/flower cycle, verus either of those.

so go with the single 315 in there, because the 630 is to much heat?


then in a year or so once I'm dialed in.
then supplement with a 200W (4)cob light bar
or just add in another 315 and Bigger Fan??

as many of you sit back and shake your heads*

thccbdhealth said:

so go with the single 315 in there, because the 630 is to much heat?


then in a year or so once I'm dialed in.
then supplement with a 200W (4)cob light bar
or just add in another 315 and Bigger Fan??

as many of you sit back and shake your heads*

Click to expand...

go with the COB, sure they'll be on the next big chip craze by then... lol. You could go with an nanolux 630 in the 4 by 4 but I would advise to get these
http://nanoluxtech.com/products/nccs/
so u can have complete control of them to help dial in ur tent..

are you saying go with cob over all ?

I think ill start with the single 315, now I have one of those burple led, 300w 145w in reality, is that even worth running? its made by Apallo Horticulture, says the label

so nanolux does apparently have a remot ballast, now I'm wondering how I could incorporate this, I don't know enough

http://growershouse.com/nanolux-cmh-315w-ballast

http://nanoluxtech.com/products/cmh-315w-fixture/


any explanations would be appreciated

DuganNash said:

Haha. I'm trying to glean some positives to using the 630s, but it's getting difficult.

Click to expand...

Also from my research the bulb emits better in the vertical vs. the horizontal position. My 315 crushed a 4x2 tent. I had the plants stuffed in there and they did great.