Couple Fined For Refusing To Host Gay Wedding Shuts Down Venue

Rob Roy said:

Because blacks were abused by coercive government types, does not mean they can in turn dictate the use of an indifferent persons private property does it? No, no it doesn't.

Click to expand...

you're right, only the racist business owner can dictate the use of his private property. and they can choose to make their private property a private club or a public business freely.

and there was no "coercive government type" forcing racist business owners to deny service based on skin color, a racist position which you hold.

stop trying to revise and deny history just because your racist position does not hold any water.

Rob Roy said:

I'm gonna ask for a cease fire, just for a little while okay.

Click to expand...

you can feel free to hold your self-admittedly racist position, but don't expect me to stop asking you questions about your racist position which you are unable to answer.

UncleBuck said:

you can feel free to hold your self-admittedly racist position, but don't expect me to stop asking you questions about your racist position which you are unable to answer.

Click to expand...

When you kick the cat does it make you feel good? I mean like a really good fucking kick, the kind that has the little fucker off yowling and spitting. I mean even your cat has a litter box, even your cat can shit in the right place, why can't you?

UncleBuck said:

you're right, only the racist business owner can dictate the use of his private property. and they can choose to make their private property a private club or a public business freely.

and there was no "coercive government type" forcing racist business owners to deny service based on skin color, a racist position which you hold.

stop trying to revise and deny history just because your racist position does not hold any water.

Click to expand...

Those weren't government police thugs in the pictures dipshit?

Your cat called and said he shit on your floor and he said he ate your fucking gerbils. Now what are you gonna do?

Rob Roy said:

Those weren't government police thugs in the pictures dipshit?

Click to expand...

those "coercive government types" were there to enforce your racist position of denial of service based on skin color.

to repeat your own words back at you: I can think of no better way to ensure peace can you?

UncleBuck said:

those "coercive government types" were there to enforce your racist position of denial of service based on skin color.

to repeat your own words back at you: I can think of no better way to ensure peace can you?

Click to expand...

No they were beating people in the street as far as I can tell.

Everybody, blacks, whites, gerbils and fat ladies that won't provide you a sexual service in a Wendys bathroom, have the right to determine the use of their OWN body and their OWN property.


So who has the right to make other people serve them?

How is your cat doing? Why do you think it is okay to kick your cat, when it was the gerbil that bit you?

UncleBuck said:

you're right, only the racist business owner can dictate the use of his private property. and they can choose to make their private property a private club or a public business freely.

and there was no "coercive government type" forcing racist business owners to deny service based on skin color, a racist position which you hold.

stop trying to revise and deny history just because your racist position does not hold any water.

Click to expand...

Here's a quote you won't understand boot licker -

Market anarchists, like all anarchists, start from the assumption of ordinary people encountering each other as equals, and deciding without coercion how best to work together to meet their mutual needs. This may be by exchanging the products of their labor, by producing cooperatively or by sharing. The main thing, as anarchist David Graeber has argued, is that whatever forms of organization emerge will do so through an open-ended process of interaction among equals, in which no party can call on armed force to compel others to obey their will.

UncleBuck said:

how is it a forced association since the business owner can freely choose to be a private club or open to the public?

and you still haven't answered my straightforward, non-hypothetical question about whether denial of service caused harm.

Click to expand...

Yes, the government denial of service to blacks caused plenty of harm...

Rob Roy said:

No they were beating people in the street as far as I can tell.

Click to expand...

in order to enforce and protect the racist, segregationist policies you endorse.

@UncleBuck
From a psychological discussion basis why do you think it is you always think about cock?

UncleBuck said:

anything includes skin color.

so i am right to say that you side with the business owner who wants to deny service based on skin color.

yet somehow you claim that position is not racist.

Click to expand...

If a black shop owner chooses to deny service based on skin color would he be racist?? And if his choice is racist doesnt it apply equally?? Thus anyone can be racist and prevent themselves from certain portions of business if they choose to do so...

You already showed how it is easy to start a private club to get around the rules anyway.

Based on your own explanations, why is it a problem if people can already do it anyway??

IRON-EYES said:

@UncleBuck
From a psychological discussion basis why do you think it is you always think about cock?

Click to expand...

Because he is a giant narcissistic dick...

NLXSK1 said:

Yes, the government denial of service to blacks caused plenty of harm...

Click to expand...

you endorse denial of service based on skin color in the private sphere. how is that any less harmful?

UncleBuck said:

you endorse denial of service based on skin color in the private sphere. how is that any less harmful?

Click to expand...

What are you some kind a white guy superhero for like everybody else they're arty got writes them in that and I confused are we living in the 60s???

Awesome! This discussion, again.

This place sucks!

UncleBuck said:

you endorse denial of service based on skin color in the private sphere. how is that any less harmful?

Click to expand...

Because the government is a monopoly in many cases. And in those cases I do support civil rights.

In the private sector, some of the civil rights rulings have been intrusive and simply moved the coercion from one party to another.

NLXSK1 said:

If a black shop owner chooses to deny service based on skin color would he be racist??

Click to expand...

so simple.

kelly4 said:

Awesome! This discussion, again.

This place sucks!

Click to expand...

Then go away and come back when you are bored...

NLXSK1 said:

In the private sector, some of the civil rights rulings have been intrusive and simply moved the coercion from one party to another.

Click to expand...

you didn't answer the question.

let me pose to you the same question that cowardly racist rob refuses to answer:

did denial of service to blacks in the south before civil rights cause harm?