digital ballasts suck ass

capacitor source??? why doesn't my local hydro shop carry them? any tutorials on this?
dbkick said:
if you'd like to know how well your lighting set up really is get a welders mask and watch the flow of plasma in the arc, it should be smooth .
You coil and core people should change out capacitor every two years or brightness is affected. But coil and core are very low thd and as already stated easily rebuilt.
After my experience with 5 brands of digital ballast I've decided there is only one. Where the first one I bought , a 1kw chinese made welthink worked like a champ it brought the cable guy to the door.
Lumatek , I do own one and it seems to work, don't have a welders mask to look at the arc so I just assume like all older lumatek it operates with a high percentage thd.
I'm running a quantum at the moment that I also have no comment on really, it's a ballast.
I bought a hydrofarm phantom that I THOUGHT was gonna be the shit but found out before 1 cycle was up that they do have defects, it was the first return the shop I bought at had seen of a phantom and they were surprised, I was def turned off by the phantom failure and went with solis tek, I won't be looking back.
Then there's the solis tek matrix I bought awhile back. I'll never buy another ballast .
Click to expand...
 
your local shop doesn't carry them more than likely because people don't replace them as needed. They wait for failure.
 
Not from what I have seen with my quantum meter(actual amount of light). My 600 mags do not do as well as my buddies digitals, and we have the same brands(growops)...just the respective digital or mag versions. Anything that is judge by lumens/lux/foot candles is worthless to me and plants for the most part. But interesting there isn't still a small difference when looking based on lumens too.

Here is a public par test for a bunch of digitals and one mag. Yes the mag is a cheaper mag, but still that is quite a bit a of difference even compared to the lower end digitals.
http://growershouse.com/blog/1000w-...umatek-solis-tek-quantum-phantom-galaxy-nano/
1000w_ballast_test_info_1.jpg
 
Same bulb brand and age to right. The guy with the mag is not ruining a 14 month old bulb against 3 month old or a optilume against a hortilux, right same hoods same reflectivity, right
tags420 said:
Not from what I have seen with my quantum meter(actual amount of light). My 600 mags do not do as well as my buddies digitals, and we have the same brands(growops)...just the respective digital or mag versions. Anything that is judge by lumens/lux/foot candles is worthless to me and plants for the most part. But interesting there isn't still a small difference when looking based on lumens too.

Here is a public par test for a bunch of digitals and one mag. Yes the mag is a cheaper mag, but still that is quite a bit a of difference even compared to the lower end digitals.
http://growershouse.com/blog/1000w-...umatek-solis-tek-quantum-phantom-galaxy-nano/
View attachment 2823357
Click to expand...
 
I wonder if it would be possible to do a candle grow. :-) sorry i'm stoned. But imagine 35000 candles that will roughly be a 400 w HPS wont it. Just very difficult to keep them burning long enough and you will need to blow them out when you want your lights off. No digital or magnetic ballast needed at all.
 
TheDude0007 said:
I wonder if it would be possible to do a candle grow. :-) sorry i'm stoned. But imagine 35000 candles that will roughly be a 400 w HPS wont it. Just very difficult to keep them burning long enough and you will need to blow them out when you want your lights off. No digital or magnetic ballast needed at all.
Click to expand...


i imagine 35k candles burning and forgetting about them and then the home burns down.
 
tusseltussel said:
Same bulb brand and age to right. The guy with the mag is not ruining a 14 month old bulb against 3 month old or a optilume against a hortilux, right same hoods same reflectivity, right
Click to expand...

Same bulbs(genesis 600w hps). Mags bulb and ballast are older by only 3 weeks. Digital had almost 2month on it when tested...mag about 3months I guess. Same reflectors cause I gave him one of mine that was still in the box(new). Could maybe have been a 3%-5% degradation in my hood(mag's) from being one cycle older but that's looking for difference. That's pretty close to all things equal other than the ballast.

I did not see a 30% difference in my field test like growers house...closer to 15% but that is still more light. The peaks were about ~875+/-umols@12 compared to the digital setup ~1025+/-umol@12" at 600w setting(not super lumen).
 
my Solis Tek matrix is a PITA it doesn't like to light by the built in timer.It errors out e-04 saying there is a short circuit when trying to use 2 -600s.I wish I got the regular ST-not the matrix
 
slowbus said:
my Solis Tek matrix is a PITA it doesn't like to light by the built in timer.It errors out e-04 saying there is a short circuit when trying to use 2 -600s.I wish I got the regular ST-not the matrix
Click to expand...

two 600s? on a splitter?
 
I'm wondering if when you use the internal timer is the only time it's running software that controls ignition and things. e-04 is an end of lamp life error.Since you mention the internal timer.
 
dbkick said:
two 600s? on a splitter?
Click to expand...

yeah,all solis tek except the bulbs.It will error out.I unplug the splitter and plug the directly from light to bal.It lights.I do the other one next.It lights.Now once they've both been lit.I then use the splitter and it will fire both lamps.
The timer works great for 1 bulb -other then that not so much
 
dbkick said:
I'm wondering if when you use the internal timer is the only time it's running software that controls ignition and things. e-04 is an end of lamp life error.Since you mention the internal timer.
Click to expand...


thats the common answer=EOLL but if you dig deeper it actually means short circuit also and it lights off the timer just the same
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top