DNC Email Leak

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So why didn't Hillary Clinton vote against the Iraq war if it was "based on cherrypicking by the Bush administration" and "plainly false reports" published by the intelligence community?
the extent of it wasn't known at the time.

what does this have to do with you being wrong about literally everything?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
sorry for pointing out your lie.
I said "our intelligence agencies", not "17 of our intelligence agencies". The fact remains valid. Our intelligence agencies supported the intelligence that got us into the war in Iraq. That's why I asked you if you believe we should accept everything our intelligence agencies report as fact. I didn't ask you If you believe "we should accept everything 17 intelligence agencies report as fact".
we should accept our ICs' conclusions as fact if they match observable facts, like trump accidentally reading off a wikileak to his klan rally 20 minutes before it also dropped on sputnik and RT.
Do you have a link for this claim?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I said "our intelligence agencies", not "17 of our intelligence agencies". The fact remains valid. Our intelligence agencies supported the intelligence that got us into the war in Iraq. That's why I asked you if you believe we should accept everything our intelligence agencies report as fact. I didn't ask you If you believe "we should accept everything 17 intelligence agencies report as fact".

Do you have a link for this claim?
you were so busy stroking that hillary clinton hate boner that you never paid attention during the campaign. no wonder you're repating trump lies.

http://www.npr.org/2016/10/11/497520017/trump-apparently-quotes-russian-propaganda-to-slam-clinton-on-benghazi

i bet you were so asshurt about hillary stomping bernie down the drain with complete ease that you rooted for trump.

fucking collaborator shitbag.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
The New York Times came out with a pretty good guess list of potentials.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/mobile.nytimes.com/2017/04/30/us/politics/democrats-2020.amp.html
Insiders.
Heavy hitters.
Donors.

These are the kinds of people that cost the Democrats so dearly in the last few elections.

We cannot run 'Republican lite' and expect success, either in filling offices or passing the kinds of policy changes the majority of American citizens want.

That's because the end of the aristocratic class IS what Americans want.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Insiders.
Heavy hitters.
Donors.

These are the kinds of people that cost the Democrats so dearly in the last few elections.

We cannot run 'Republican lite' and expect success, either in filling offices or passing the kinds of policy changes the majority of American citizens want.

That's because the end of the aristocratic class IS what Americans want.
still pledging allegiance to dear cult leader, eh?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
still pledging allegiance to dear cult leader, eh?
You are the one kneeling and sucking the cocks of the establishment Democrats, not me.

I refuse to accept the same old influence peddling by mega donors as anything new- or worth voting for. I'm not alone and you have done an excellent job of showing just how strong that position is.

You have no answers, just more personal attacks. It's as if you've become Republican.

In fact, since that's what you want the Democratic Party to be, why don't you just go be a republican? We don't want you.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
You guys are pretty harsh much of the time.


What about the other party? You know, the one that denies truth, science and has been the advocates of the wealthy since Herbert Hoover?
Yeah, well what about them?

Are we supposed to accept a corrupt Democratic Party just because the other alternative is worse?!

I think you've just defined what's wrong with the current state of American politics.

How about 'no'. No more donors. No more influence peddlers. No more corporate campaign cash.

Maybe you can explain what's wrong with the Will of the People, as opposed to the rule of dollars?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I mean.. you rail on Conservatives to this day for getting us into the Iraq war, and yet, your favorite politician voted in support of it regardless of the evidence other, better politicians knew better of.. It was popular at the time, and she had bigger political ambitions.. She calculated at the time voting against it would be detrimental to her political future. Sanders voted in accordance with his values. Ironic, right?

Lmao
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Yeah, well what about them?

Are we supposed to accept a corrupt Democratic Party just because the other alternative is worse?!

I think you've just defined what's wrong with the current state of American politics.

How about 'no'. No more donors. No more influence peddlers. No more corporate campaign cash.

Maybe you can explain what's wrong with the Will of the People, as opposed to the rule of dollars?
Lol.

The will of the people?

The 'people' are the ones who voted in assholes last November. The 'people' must be pretty stupid most of the time, believing in fake news.

The will of the people elected Trump. It's not like the will of the people matches what you advocate over the last 35 years.

Who are the 'people'? The Trump base? The establishment Democrats? The tiny fraction of progressive Democrats? The establishment neocons?

There's a whole lot of 'people'. They aren't all sharing your philosophy. How are you going to win some of them over?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Lol.

The will of the people?

The 'people' are the ones who voted in assholes last November. The 'people' must be pretty stupid most of the time, believing in fake news.

The will of the people elected Trump. It's not like the will of the people matches what you advocate over the last 35 years.

Who are the 'people'? The Trump base? The establishment Democrats? The tiny fraction of progressive Democrats? The establishment neocons?

There's a whole lot of 'people'. They aren't all sharing your philosophy. How are you going to win some of them over?
Well, bribery and propaganda don't seem to be working so hot.

One of the reasons people voted for Trump was for change. Did you ignore or tune out all those interviews admit how Mrs Clinton was the embodiment of the very establishment they were sick of?

Honesty seems to be completely beyond the ability of America's political system anymore.
 
Last edited:

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
One of the reasons people voted for Trump was for change. Did you ignore or time out all those interviews admit how Mrs Clinton was the embodiment of the very establishment they were sick of?
I don't pay much attention to wing nuts.


And 'honesty' has fucking never played a big role in American politics.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
OK, then. I'm going to take a nap and when I get up in a half hour, I'll be expecting a new political landscape.
If one persons light bulb goes on because of something I said, I consider it job well done.

Take things in workable pieces..baby steps..we are a very young country and anything can happen.

Now I'm getting ready for work..enjoy your nap!
 
Top