printer
Well-Known Member
It does not matter how bad you are doing as long as you get to count the votes.
Examples of GOP Leadership
- Thread starter injinji
- Start date
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Those the Gods wish to destroy they first make mad.
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
Because mccarthy is in complete control of his house.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4037690-conservatives-stun-leaders-with-dramatic-mutiny-on-house-floor/
Sad, pathetic party, led by sad, pathetic self deluded losers.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4037690-conservatives-stun-leaders-with-dramatic-mutiny-on-house-floor/
Sad, pathetic party, led by sad, pathetic self deluded losers.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
printer
Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Herb & Suds
Well-Known Member
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Liar’en Boebert strikes again
amp.cnn.com
Boebert claims she missed a vote as a ‘protest’ – but CNN’s camera caught her running up the House steps as it ended | CNN Politics
On Saturday, Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado posted a video on Twitter in which she claimed that she had intentionally skipped Wednesday’s key House vote on a bill to suspend the nation’s debt ceiling.
compassionateExotic
Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
trump committing Hari-Kari publicly wouldn't wash away the stain he has left on this country, a stain that his children seem ready to deepen...
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
https://apnews.com/article/pat-robertson-dead-christian-broadcasting-700-club-91299d0953c014ca6860fe545cac793e
HALLELUJAH MOTHERFUCKER....This fucking bastard has done as much to fuck up American politics as any terrorist supporting world leader, the world is a better place for him not being in it, and i'm just fucking sorry it took so god damned long for him to fucking croak.
I hope he'll be warm in hell.
HALLELUJAH MOTHERFUCKER....This fucking bastard has done as much to fuck up American politics as any terrorist supporting world leader, the world is a better place for him not being in it, and i'm just fucking sorry it took so god damned long for him to fucking croak.
I hope he'll be warm in hell.
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/06/07/christopher-wray-contempt-house-gop-00100953
comer and mccarthy are both yapping dogs, hoping to hold off their own fate. The only republican in the house that is even more pathetic is gymshorts.
comer and mccarthy are both yapping dogs, hoping to hold off their own fate. The only republican in the house that is even more pathetic is gymshorts.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
The flames in Hell will be burning hotter with his arrival!
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
hope morning star has a special spot for his ass
printer
Well-Known Member
GOP warns of pushback ahead of looming Trump indictment
The expected federal indictment of former President Trump, which former Attorney General Bill Barr predicts is “near,” is teeing up a Capitol Hill battle over funding for the Justice Department and FBI.
Trump allies, led by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), have threatened to cut Department of Justice and FBI funding if those federal law enforcement agencies target Trump — but that’s not a popular idea with Senate Republicans, who fear it gives political ammo to Democrats.
The issue is heating up as lawmakers turn their attention to the annual spending bills to fund the federal law enforcement agencies.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), a Trump ally, has called on Congress to reform the FBI in “a major way.”
“Maybe we need to break them up,” he said.
“I do want law enforcement available to do law enforcement tasks. My concern with the FBI is they don’t seem very concerned about law enforcement; they seem focused on these political witch hunts,” he added.
Hawley believes Trump will be the Republican nominee for president in 2024, potentially creating the appearance of a political conflict of interest if he is charged and brought to trial by a Department of Justice that is part of President Biden’s administration.
“I think Donald Trump is going to be the Republican nominee, I really do,” he said.
Hawley said if federal prosecutors charge Trump for his handling of classified documents while not charging Biden for sensitive documents he kept in his personal possession after leaving the Obama administration, it “would be a big mistake on this administration’s part.”
“The political outcry on that, and rightly so, would be huge,” he warned.
Senate Republican Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) does not support Trump’s bid to win the Republican nomination for president, but he nevertheless criticized the FBI’s limited cooperation with Republican lawmakers in both chambers who are seeking more information about the agency’s investigations.
“All I know is that the FBI and Department of Justice, there’s an oversight role that Congress has, and when [lawmakers] request things, I think the expectation is that they’re going to produce them,” he said.
Thune pointed out that Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, “feels very strongly that the FBI has not been forthcoming.”
“That’s a problem for them. So I expect that will change, certainly hope that will change because the alternatives aren’t good,” he warned.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has accused Republicans of wanting to defund federal law enforcement, flipping the script on GOP leaders who accused Democrats of wanting to defund the police in 2020 and 2022.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) took a shot at Republicans when asked about talk among Republicans about using the appropriations process to push back on the Justice Department.
“Honest to God, they run a campaign against Democrats saying we want to defund the police, and then they turn around and want to defund the FBI and Department of Justice. It just shows how radical the MAGA Republicans can be,” he said.
Jordan, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo in April that, “We’re gonna have to look at the appropriations process and limit funds going to some of these agencies, particularly the ones that are engaging in the most egregious behavior.”
Asked whether he was referring to the FBI and Department of Justice, Jordan replied “yeah” and added: “What I’d really like, frankly, I’d really like for the government to just stay out of the election process.”
The debate among Republicans over whether to use their power of the purse to dissuade the Department of Justice from prosecuting Trump comes while the former president holds a commanding lead in the polls over his Republican rivals ahead of next year’s presidential primary.
Any federal indictment of Trump, either because of his role in trying to stop the certification of President Biden’s victory in the 2020 election or his handling of classified documents, would come amid escalating tensions between GOP lawmakers and the nation’s top law enforcement officials, Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray.
Asked whether there’s an appetite among Senate Republicans for using Congress’s power over federal budgets to rein in the Department of Justice, Hawley, a member of the Judiciary Committee, quipped: “We could zero out Merrick’s [Garland] salary.”
“Maybe we start there,” he said.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a fellow member of the Judiciary Committee, on Monday called Garland the most “political” attorney general in U.S. history.
“This attorney general, Merrick Garland, is the most partisan, he is the most political attorney general in our nation’s history,” Cruz told Fox News host Sean Hannity. “I believe Merrick Garland will indict Donald Trump. He wants to indict Donald Trump because he hates Donald Trump.”
Cruz accused the attorney general of carrying a grudge over getting blocked from getting confirmed to the Supreme Court in 2016, when then-President Obama nominated him to fill the seat held by late Justice Antonin Scalia.
The Texas senator predicted Garland would charge Trump with obstruction of justice for hiding classified documents stored at Mar-a-Lago from federal prosecutors to rationalize the decision to charge Trump but not Biden for improper handling of top-secret information.
Barr, who served as Trump’s attorney general but has more recently been a critic of his former boss, told “CBS Mornings” he expects federal prosecutors to indict Trump soon.
“If I had to bet, I would bet that it’s near,” he said.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, told The Hill on Wednesday he would wait to see whether the Justice Department moves ahead with an indictment before deciding the next steps.
“Call me when that happens,” he said.
thehill.com
The expected federal indictment of former President Trump, which former Attorney General Bill Barr predicts is “near,” is teeing up a Capitol Hill battle over funding for the Justice Department and FBI.
Trump allies, led by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), have threatened to cut Department of Justice and FBI funding if those federal law enforcement agencies target Trump — but that’s not a popular idea with Senate Republicans, who fear it gives political ammo to Democrats.
The issue is heating up as lawmakers turn their attention to the annual spending bills to fund the federal law enforcement agencies.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), a Trump ally, has called on Congress to reform the FBI in “a major way.”
“Maybe we need to break them up,” he said.
“I do want law enforcement available to do law enforcement tasks. My concern with the FBI is they don’t seem very concerned about law enforcement; they seem focused on these political witch hunts,” he added.
Hawley believes Trump will be the Republican nominee for president in 2024, potentially creating the appearance of a political conflict of interest if he is charged and brought to trial by a Department of Justice that is part of President Biden’s administration.
“I think Donald Trump is going to be the Republican nominee, I really do,” he said.
Hawley said if federal prosecutors charge Trump for his handling of classified documents while not charging Biden for sensitive documents he kept in his personal possession after leaving the Obama administration, it “would be a big mistake on this administration’s part.”
“The political outcry on that, and rightly so, would be huge,” he warned.
Senate Republican Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) does not support Trump’s bid to win the Republican nomination for president, but he nevertheless criticized the FBI’s limited cooperation with Republican lawmakers in both chambers who are seeking more information about the agency’s investigations.
“All I know is that the FBI and Department of Justice, there’s an oversight role that Congress has, and when [lawmakers] request things, I think the expectation is that they’re going to produce them,” he said.
Thune pointed out that Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, “feels very strongly that the FBI has not been forthcoming.”
“That’s a problem for them. So I expect that will change, certainly hope that will change because the alternatives aren’t good,” he warned.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has accused Republicans of wanting to defund federal law enforcement, flipping the script on GOP leaders who accused Democrats of wanting to defund the police in 2020 and 2022.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) took a shot at Republicans when asked about talk among Republicans about using the appropriations process to push back on the Justice Department.
“Honest to God, they run a campaign against Democrats saying we want to defund the police, and then they turn around and want to defund the FBI and Department of Justice. It just shows how radical the MAGA Republicans can be,” he said.
Jordan, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo in April that, “We’re gonna have to look at the appropriations process and limit funds going to some of these agencies, particularly the ones that are engaging in the most egregious behavior.”
Asked whether he was referring to the FBI and Department of Justice, Jordan replied “yeah” and added: “What I’d really like, frankly, I’d really like for the government to just stay out of the election process.”
The debate among Republicans over whether to use their power of the purse to dissuade the Department of Justice from prosecuting Trump comes while the former president holds a commanding lead in the polls over his Republican rivals ahead of next year’s presidential primary.
Any federal indictment of Trump, either because of his role in trying to stop the certification of President Biden’s victory in the 2020 election or his handling of classified documents, would come amid escalating tensions between GOP lawmakers and the nation’s top law enforcement officials, Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray.
Asked whether there’s an appetite among Senate Republicans for using Congress’s power over federal budgets to rein in the Department of Justice, Hawley, a member of the Judiciary Committee, quipped: “We could zero out Merrick’s [Garland] salary.”
“Maybe we start there,” he said.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a fellow member of the Judiciary Committee, on Monday called Garland the most “political” attorney general in U.S. history.
“This attorney general, Merrick Garland, is the most partisan, he is the most political attorney general in our nation’s history,” Cruz told Fox News host Sean Hannity. “I believe Merrick Garland will indict Donald Trump. He wants to indict Donald Trump because he hates Donald Trump.”
Cruz accused the attorney general of carrying a grudge over getting blocked from getting confirmed to the Supreme Court in 2016, when then-President Obama nominated him to fill the seat held by late Justice Antonin Scalia.
The Texas senator predicted Garland would charge Trump with obstruction of justice for hiding classified documents stored at Mar-a-Lago from federal prosecutors to rationalize the decision to charge Trump but not Biden for improper handling of top-secret information.
Barr, who served as Trump’s attorney general but has more recently been a critic of his former boss, told “CBS Mornings” he expects federal prosecutors to indict Trump soon.
“If I had to bet, I would bet that it’s near,” he said.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, told The Hill on Wednesday he would wait to see whether the Justice Department moves ahead with an indictment before deciding the next steps.
“Call me when that happens,” he said.
GOP warns of pushback ahead of looming Trump indictment
The expected federal indictment of former President Trump, which former Attorney General Bill Barr predicts is “near,” is teeing up a Capitol Hill battle over funding for the Justice Department and…
thehill.com
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Interesting that the ones who complain that FBI has “not been forthcoming” are often those at risk from ongoing criminal investigations.GOP warns of pushback ahead of looming Trump indictment
The expected federal indictment of former President Trump, which former Attorney General Bill Barr predicts is “near,” is teeing up a Capitol Hill battle over funding for the Justice Department and FBI.
Trump allies, led by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), have threatened to cut Department of Justice and FBI funding if those federal law enforcement agencies target Trump — but that’s not a popular idea with Senate Republicans, who fear it gives political ammo to Democrats.
The issue is heating up as lawmakers turn their attention to the annual spending bills to fund the federal law enforcement agencies.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), a Trump ally, has called on Congress to reform the FBI in “a major way.”
“Maybe we need to break them up,” he said.
“I do want law enforcement available to do law enforcement tasks. My concern with the FBI is they don’t seem very concerned about law enforcement; they seem focused on these political witch hunts,” he added.
Hawley believes Trump will be the Republican nominee for president in 2024, potentially creating the appearance of a political conflict of interest if he is charged and brought to trial by a Department of Justice that is part of President Biden’s administration.
“I think Donald Trump is going to be the Republican nominee, I really do,” he said.
Hawley said if federal prosecutors charge Trump for his handling of classified documents while not charging Biden for sensitive documents he kept in his personal possession after leaving the Obama administration, it “would be a big mistake on this administration’s part.”
“The political outcry on that, and rightly so, would be huge,” he warned.
Senate Republican Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) does not support Trump’s bid to win the Republican nomination for president, but he nevertheless criticized the FBI’s limited cooperation with Republican lawmakers in both chambers who are seeking more information about the agency’s investigations.
“All I know is that the FBI and Department of Justice, there’s an oversight role that Congress has, and when [lawmakers] request things, I think the expectation is that they’re going to produce them,” he said.
Thune pointed out that Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, “feels very strongly that the FBI has not been forthcoming.”
“That’s a problem for them. So I expect that will change, certainly hope that will change because the alternatives aren’t good,” he warned.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has accused Republicans of wanting to defund federal law enforcement, flipping the script on GOP leaders who accused Democrats of wanting to defund the police in 2020 and 2022.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) took a shot at Republicans when asked about talk among Republicans about using the appropriations process to push back on the Justice Department.
“Honest to God, they run a campaign against Democrats saying we want to defund the police, and then they turn around and want to defund the FBI and Department of Justice. It just shows how radical the MAGA Republicans can be,” he said.
Jordan, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo in April that, “We’re gonna have to look at the appropriations process and limit funds going to some of these agencies, particularly the ones that are engaging in the most egregious behavior.”
Asked whether he was referring to the FBI and Department of Justice, Jordan replied “yeah” and added: “What I’d really like, frankly, I’d really like for the government to just stay out of the election process.”
The debate among Republicans over whether to use their power of the purse to dissuade the Department of Justice from prosecuting Trump comes while the former president holds a commanding lead in the polls over his Republican rivals ahead of next year’s presidential primary.
Any federal indictment of Trump, either because of his role in trying to stop the certification of President Biden’s victory in the 2020 election or his handling of classified documents, would come amid escalating tensions between GOP lawmakers and the nation’s top law enforcement officials, Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray.
Asked whether there’s an appetite among Senate Republicans for using Congress’s power over federal budgets to rein in the Department of Justice, Hawley, a member of the Judiciary Committee, quipped: “We could zero out Merrick’s [Garland] salary.”
“Maybe we start there,” he said.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a fellow member of the Judiciary Committee, on Monday called Garland the most “political” attorney general in U.S. history.
“This attorney general, Merrick Garland, is the most partisan, he is the most political attorney general in our nation’s history,” Cruz told Fox News host Sean Hannity. “I believe Merrick Garland will indict Donald Trump. He wants to indict Donald Trump because he hates Donald Trump.”
Cruz accused the attorney general of carrying a grudge over getting blocked from getting confirmed to the Supreme Court in 2016, when then-President Obama nominated him to fill the seat held by late Justice Antonin Scalia.
The Texas senator predicted Garland would charge Trump with obstruction of justice for hiding classified documents stored at Mar-a-Lago from federal prosecutors to rationalize the decision to charge Trump but not Biden for improper handling of top-secret information.
Barr, who served as Trump’s attorney general but has more recently been a critic of his former boss, told “CBS Mornings” he expects federal prosecutors to indict Trump soon.
“If I had to bet, I would bet that it’s near,” he said.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, told The Hill on Wednesday he would wait to see whether the Justice Department moves ahead with an indictment before deciding the next steps.
“Call me when that happens,” he said.
GOP warns of pushback ahead of looming Trump indictment
The expected federal indictment of former President Trump, which former Attorney General Bill Barr predicts is “near,” is teeing up a Capitol Hill battle over funding for the Justice Department and…
It is to say hmmm.
compassionateExotic
Well-Known Member
They forgot hunters laptop and hilllarys emails lol
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Since Mark started squealing for a deal from the DOJ a few of them have been freaking out and appear nervous. I figure Mark could put them in prison over J6 and a few of them asked him for pardons for a reason. If anybody wanted a pardon they contacted Mark, who was Trump's gate keeper for most of them and Mark was at meetings in the WH with them too and knows where all the bodies are buried.GOP warns of pushback ahead of looming Trump indictment
The expected federal indictment of former President Trump, which former Attorney General Bill Barr predicts is “near,” is teeing up a Capitol Hill battle over funding for the Justice Department and FBI.
Trump allies, led by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), have threatened to cut Department of Justice and FBI funding if those federal law enforcement agencies target Trump — but that’s not a popular idea with Senate Republicans, who fear it gives political ammo to Democrats.
The issue is heating up as lawmakers turn their attention to the annual spending bills to fund the federal law enforcement agencies.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), a Trump ally, has called on Congress to reform the FBI in “a major way.”
“Maybe we need to break them up,” he said.
“I do want law enforcement available to do law enforcement tasks. My concern with the FBI is they don’t seem very concerned about law enforcement; they seem focused on these political witch hunts,” he added.
Hawley believes Trump will be the Republican nominee for president in 2024, potentially creating the appearance of a political conflict of interest if he is charged and brought to trial by a Department of Justice that is part of President Biden’s administration.
“I think Donald Trump is going to be the Republican nominee, I really do,” he said.
Hawley said if federal prosecutors charge Trump for his handling of classified documents while not charging Biden for sensitive documents he kept in his personal possession after leaving the Obama administration, it “would be a big mistake on this administration’s part.”
“The political outcry on that, and rightly so, would be huge,” he warned.
Senate Republican Whip John Thune (R-S.D.) does not support Trump’s bid to win the Republican nomination for president, but he nevertheless criticized the FBI’s limited cooperation with Republican lawmakers in both chambers who are seeking more information about the agency’s investigations.
“All I know is that the FBI and Department of Justice, there’s an oversight role that Congress has, and when [lawmakers] request things, I think the expectation is that they’re going to produce them,” he said.
Thune pointed out that Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, “feels very strongly that the FBI has not been forthcoming.”
“That’s a problem for them. So I expect that will change, certainly hope that will change because the alternatives aren’t good,” he warned.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has accused Republicans of wanting to defund federal law enforcement, flipping the script on GOP leaders who accused Democrats of wanting to defund the police in 2020 and 2022.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) took a shot at Republicans when asked about talk among Republicans about using the appropriations process to push back on the Justice Department.
“Honest to God, they run a campaign against Democrats saying we want to defund the police, and then they turn around and want to defund the FBI and Department of Justice. It just shows how radical the MAGA Republicans can be,” he said.
Jordan, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo in April that, “We’re gonna have to look at the appropriations process and limit funds going to some of these agencies, particularly the ones that are engaging in the most egregious behavior.”
Asked whether he was referring to the FBI and Department of Justice, Jordan replied “yeah” and added: “What I’d really like, frankly, I’d really like for the government to just stay out of the election process.”
The debate among Republicans over whether to use their power of the purse to dissuade the Department of Justice from prosecuting Trump comes while the former president holds a commanding lead in the polls over his Republican rivals ahead of next year’s presidential primary.
Any federal indictment of Trump, either because of his role in trying to stop the certification of President Biden’s victory in the 2020 election or his handling of classified documents, would come amid escalating tensions between GOP lawmakers and the nation’s top law enforcement officials, Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray.
Asked whether there’s an appetite among Senate Republicans for using Congress’s power over federal budgets to rein in the Department of Justice, Hawley, a member of the Judiciary Committee, quipped: “We could zero out Merrick’s [Garland] salary.”
“Maybe we start there,” he said.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a fellow member of the Judiciary Committee, on Monday called Garland the most “political” attorney general in U.S. history.
“This attorney general, Merrick Garland, is the most partisan, he is the most political attorney general in our nation’s history,” Cruz told Fox News host Sean Hannity. “I believe Merrick Garland will indict Donald Trump. He wants to indict Donald Trump because he hates Donald Trump.”
Cruz accused the attorney general of carrying a grudge over getting blocked from getting confirmed to the Supreme Court in 2016, when then-President Obama nominated him to fill the seat held by late Justice Antonin Scalia.
The Texas senator predicted Garland would charge Trump with obstruction of justice for hiding classified documents stored at Mar-a-Lago from federal prosecutors to rationalize the decision to charge Trump but not Biden for improper handling of top-secret information.
Barr, who served as Trump’s attorney general but has more recently been a critic of his former boss, told “CBS Mornings” he expects federal prosecutors to indict Trump soon.
“If I had to bet, I would bet that it’s near,” he said.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, told The Hill on Wednesday he would wait to see whether the Justice Department moves ahead with an indictment before deciding the next steps.
“Call me when that happens,” he said.
GOP warns of pushback ahead of looming Trump indictment
The expected federal indictment of former President Trump, which former Attorney General Bill Barr predicts is “near,” is teeing up a Capitol Hill battle over funding for the Justice Department and…
compassionateExotic
Well-Known Member
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
The Trump trials, by that I mean trying Trump and all the scumbag MAGA GOP leaders in Congress who tried to overthrow the 2020 election, are not going to save the US from MAGA fascism in 2024. Rescuing US democracy from MAGA fascism in 2024 will be up to the voters, Democratic Party candidates and the media. I think we are up to the challenge.
But that won't end the threat posed by MAGA GOP fascism. Building strong cases and driving them to successful verdicts in court will put an end to it for good. Smith is up against a clock to complete those trials but not the election clock. The statute of limitations triggers 5 years after the crime is committed. For most crimes committed on or leading up to the Jan 6 attempted coup, the statute of limitations is late 2025/early 2026 The Trump trials are going to consume every minute of that time.
So, the job in 2024 for US Independent and Democratic Party voters is to stay united as we have been in 2018 - 2022 and vote Democrats into Congress and the WH. That will save our democracy in 2024. Successful conclusion of the Trump Trials will finish the Trump/MAGA threat for good. I think we can finally say that light we see at the end of the tunnel is daylight and not a train coming our way.