Ghislaine Maxwell Trial

zeddd

Well-Known Member
When the Queen dies it would be awesome if Charles donated everything away turned all palaces into museum for the people. go live in a real house.

although it was said to be Charles who was the one concerned about Harry's kids skin color.

what happened to Diana was a travesty.

i'm glad Harry broke free; who wants Prince Pedos role?
Fuck all dirty parasites, get a job. These people are thieves. If she sold just 2 of the stolen diamonds, one from India at 105 carats the other from Africa at 530 carats she could end child hunger in this world
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Fuck all dirty parasites, get a job. These people are thieves. If she sold just 2 of the stolen diamonds, one from India at 105 carats the other from Africa at 530 carats she could end child hunger in this world
i totally agree and in this day and age you would think they would do just what you posted. Blood Diamonds well read yanks will never forget.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
The Armenian genocide
Over a century ago, not current.

I guess my headscratcher was the use of the word culling, which has a meaning beyond population control. There is a directed breeding element. To be a cull, you have to be chosen for having or lacking a specified quality. So simple genocide does not qualify.

So where on the planet is a minority population being bred for traits and not just persecuted?
 

xtsho

Well-Known Member
Over a century ago, not current.

I guess my headscratcher was the use of the word culling, which has a meaning beyond population control. There is a directed breeding element. To be a cull, you have to be chosen for having or lacking a specified quality. So simple genocide does not qualify.

So where on the planet is a minority population being bred for traits and not just persecuted?
More recent. Not actual killing but still despicable.


.
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
Over a century ago, not current.

I guess my headscratcher was the use of the word culling, which has a meaning beyond population control. There is a directed breeding element. To be a cull, you have to be chosen for having or lacking a specified quality. So simple genocide does not qualify.

So where on the planet is a minority population being bred for traits and not just persecuted?
Huh? I would assume ridding the populace of an unwanted color/race/religion would also be a cull. Just as wildlife is culled to eliminate some of the population. I think this is a splitting of hairs thing :(.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
Huh? I would assume ridding the populace of an unwanted color/race/religion would also be a cull. Just as wildlife is culled to eliminate some of the population. I think this is a splitting of hairs thing :(.
A cull is discriminate. You’re eradicating or stabilizing specific namable traits. Genocide is indiscriminate within the targeted population.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Over a century ago, not current.

I guess my headscratcher was the use of the word culling, which has a meaning beyond population control. There is a directed breeding element. To be a cull, you have to be chosen for having or lacking a specified quality. So simple genocide does not qualify.

So where on the planet is a minority population being bred for traits and not just persecuted?
Myanmar
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
Rohingya? Killing, not culling. Some may call it splitting hairs, and I think that is not only wrong, but I feel it carries a social pressure/shaming component.

So far all I have learned is that cull was used incorrectly the first time, implying more than was actually being said. I doubt there have been any human culls since slavery was largely abandoned.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Rohingya? Killing, not culling. Some may call it splitting hairs, and I think that is not only wrong, but I feel it carries a social pressure/shaming component.

So far all I have learned is that cull was used incorrectly the first time, implying more than was actually being said. I doubt there have been any human culls since slavery was largely abandoned.
I would cull genociders.
 

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
Me, I’d exterminate them.
While I am dead (!) set against a judicial death penalty, genociders and warlords have abandoned the social contract and are eligible for immediate unbeing under wartime rules.

But cull? I’m not trying to shape their population. I’m trying to root it out entire.
I prefer cull the herd
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Me, I’d exterminate them.
While I am dead (!) set against a judicial death penalty, genociders and warlords have abandoned the social contract and are eligible for immediate unbeing under wartime rules.

But cull? I’m not trying to shape their population. I’m trying to root it out entire.
Would that not be culling humanity?
 

zeddd

Well-Known Member
Me, I’d exterminate them.
While I am dead (!) set against a judicial death penalty, genociders and warlords have abandoned the social contract and are eligible for immediate unbeing under wartime rules.

But cull? I’m not trying to shape their population. I’m trying to root it out entire.
You need help
 
Top