Go F$CK yourself Trudy you HYPOCRITE MAGGOT LIAR

Status
Not open for further replies.

itsmehigh

Well-Known Member
This is a swab sample dude.
Totally different
And they can't just give u a breathalyzer unless they have reason. Now they don't need reason just suspicion cus they're saving kids.
I suppose we will find out if this passes and or is challenged the first time it goes to court.
Personally I think it will fail, as I said it affects everybody differently. I'm all for keeping impaired people off the roads whether is booze, cannabis, T3's or oxy. The swab test will be a showdown in court garenteed.

I've had dozens of breath test done, and I don't drink. It's just as big of an offence to refuse a breath test as it is to fail one. If the cop thinks your impaired you must submit, it's his word against yours.

Itsme
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
This is a swab sample dude.
Totally different
And they can't just give u a breathalyzer unless they have reason. Now they don't need reason just suspicion cus they're saving kids.
I suppose we will find out if this passes and or is challenged the first time it goes to court.
whats goin on.. lolyer gonna have to say it again TT I doubt he get it along with many many others who will soon hopfully GET IT lol
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
Personally I think it will fail, as I said it affects everybody differently. I'm all for keeping impaired people off the roads whether is booze, cannabis, T3's or oxy. The swab test will be a showdown in court garenteed.

I've had dozens of breath test done, and I don't drink. It's just as big of an offence to refuse a breath test as it is to fail one. If the cop thinks your impaired you must submit, it's his word against yours.

Itsme
I agree with the impaireds off the road..but dont criminal lize one more than another...specially if one is less harmful and you know it..
 

itsmehigh

Well-Known Member
There's no doubt that the test will not stand in court. You have to remember that us cannabis users are the minority. The gov needs to satisfy the majority of people with little or no experience with cannabis. I think it's a start in the right direction. The gov needs to address impaired driving to keep the non users feel safe and happy. That's their priority.

Itsme.
 

torontoke

Well-Known Member
I have had 2 24hr road side driving suspensions for suspected cannabis use.

Itsme.
Jeebus bud
12 breathalyzer test and two roadsides
U should hire a driver or get a less flashy car.
I'm 40 and never done a breathalyzer or anything else.

I agree last thing we need a millions of stoned drivers on our already clogged roads but just between your and my experience u see how our perspectives are so different.
 

itsmehigh

Well-Known Member
Jeebus bud
12 breathalyzer test and two roadsides
U should hire a driver or get a less flashy car.
I'm 40 and never done a breathalyzer or anything else.

I agree last thing we need a millions of stoned drivers on our already clogged roads but just between your and my experience u see how our perspectives are so different.
At least 12, that's being conservative. You don't have road blocks in Onterrible? In BC there are lots of impaired driver road checks around the holidays.

Itsme.
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
There's no doubt that the test will not stand in court. You have to remember that us cannabis users are the minority. The gov needs to satisfy the majority of people with little or no experience with cannabis. I think it's a start in the right direction. The gov needs to address impaired driving to keep the non users feel safe and happy. That's their priority.

Itsme.
ingesting 1000 mgs a day would see any cancer patient go to jail.
and they are not impaired
... ...not even a littel bit

but again people dont understand that and will not until it is made KNOWN!
 

itsmehigh

Well-Known Member
ingesting 1000 mgs a day would see any cancer patient go to jail.
and they are not impaired
... ...not even a littel bit

but again people dont understand that and will not until it is made KNOWN!
Maybe for you, everbodys different. Fat bastard vs skinny dude the effects are going to be different for everybody. You can't classify all users/patient together. Just because you feel no intoxication doesn't mean your not impaired. I have consumed cannabis for 30 years now, sometimes heavily, I still get high. Sometimes I shouldn't be driving, I've gotten lost driving home from work before, not good Idea to drive fuck up (damm dabs) With that being said I have never been in a car accident, and I drive high daily.

Itsme.
 

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
I don't get impaired from cannabis at all. I'd take any sobriety test anytime after consuming any amount. I don't use edible so won't count that as I don't know on that.. Unless I'm over due for sleep...good to go for me.
Prove me impaired...good luck. I would demand the test and on video...will look in court later.
This will be the issue and they will loose. You can just guess somebody is impaired...prove it please.
 

itsmehigh

Well-Known Member
I don't get impaired from cannabis at all. I'd take any sobriety test anytime after consuming any amount. I don't use edible so won't count that as I don't know on that.. Unless I'm over due for sleep...good to go for me.
Prove me impaired...good luck. I would demand the test and on video...will look in court later.
This will be the issue and they will loose. You can just guess somebody is impaired...prove it please.

My doctor had some insight on impaired driving. He wasn't as concerned with driving while high as he was about driving while burnt out, he felt it was more dangerous to drive once the high wore off, and you were tired (burnt). That makes more sense to me, that's why I'm high nearly 24/7. It's been proven that driving tired is just as bad as driving drunk, how do you prove that you are impaired from being tired? You can't. Same as cannabis.

Itsme.
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
size doesnt matter chronic either.. know a 95 pound cancer lady who was taking 150 mg no issue her chroninc smoking husband at 325 was a different story the porr fucker was floored..
ingesting is different for everyone.
 

TheRealDman

Well-Known Member
My point exactly. You can't lump everybody in the same group.

Itsme.
Exactly! That's why the little pill bottle says "be sure to know how this medication effects you before operating heavy machinery." It doesn't say "don't operate heavy machinery while using this medication"...it's implied to do it responsibly (not impaired). So why should MMJ be any different than Oxy's?
 

itsmehigh

Well-Known Member
Side note, the whole drug impaired driving bill will not target cannabis specifically. It's 2 bills, it will also address drinking and driving and other drugs too. The whole impaired driving laws are being updated/revised.

Itsme.
 

itsmehigh

Well-Known Member
Exactly! That's why the little pill bottle says "be sure to know how this medication effects you before operating heavy machinery." It doesn't say "don't operate heavy machinery while using this medication"...it's implied to do it responsibly (not impaired). So why should MMJ be any different than Oxy's?
Every med is different there are many examples that say "DONT" operated heavy equipment.

Itsme.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top