(I)Bush Outlaws War Protest

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Bush Outlaws War Protest Citizens Face Full Asset Seizure
WELL IT HAS HAPPENED. THIS MANIACAL SON OF A BITCH HAS OUTLAWED ALL WAR PROTEST AGAINST THE IRAQ WAR HERE IN THE UNITED STATES. PASSED INTO LAW JULY 17TH. SINCE CONGRESS IS TOO WEAK-KNEED TO STAND UP AND DO THE RIGHT THING, PERHAPS IT WILL BE LEFT TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. WILL THIS BEGIN THE CIVIL WAR HERE IN THE UNITED STATES PREDICTED BY JOHN TITOR? READ THE ARTICLE BELOW, "Bush Outlaws All War Protest In The United States"

... and this .... [URL="http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/07/07/19/1551242.shtml"]Executive Order Overturns US Fifth Amendment[/URL]

... and this ...
[URL="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html"]Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq[/URL]

Does it set a 'legal' precedent against future wars? with any country? ... blurring the line between Iraq & Iran?
Do the thousands of journalists, researchers, newspapers and internet websites now become outlaw at this point? Does it really look like we have a full blown dictatorship? ... and all of us that refuse to kiss the ground he walks .. criminals? - M. R.

... now tell me again how the american people will stand up to a dictatorship ... this is the begining ...:neutral:
 

Gygax1974

Just some idiot
Yes I did, but you know how the internet is nowadays...I just can't believe that a law like this would ever even get close to being reality in our beloved USA...that is the most unamerican policy ever. Someone needs to stick their foot up his ass. Sad thing is that Bush is too stupid to be doing this himself. Who's really pulling the strings? Canada looks like a nice place to live, and so does much of Europe at this point. I'm shocked:confused:
 

Dankdude

Well-Known Member
That will get overturned if taken to the supreme court.... It Violates freedom of expression.
 

AzGrOw-N-sMoKe

New Member
weak kneed hippies make me laugh...you think bush is the power in the office..lol he's just a face..behind him are dozens of people making the real choices....whats funny is that you complain of this....you think people randomly complained like this when abrahm linkin took away most of the rights as american citizens so that he could fight the war the way it needed to be...freedom isn't free, it costs folks like you an me....freedom costs a buck o 5 yes freedom costs a bbbuucckkk ooo 55555
 

Gygax1974

Just some idiot
I'm no hippie...lol. But who are the people behind the scenes? I can complain if I want I vote, and this is the 1st president that I bitch about, how can you not? He's like a moronic anti-christ. And yes I'm sure that the informed people would have even disagreed with Lincoln, plus the country was being divided....it's like apples and oranges to me just my opinion, and I am by no means an expert on politics. But taking away the 5th is horrible.
 

AzGrOw-N-sMoKe

New Member
if im not mis-taken lincoln had taken away a few of the first admenment rights isn't that worse.....how is it different when talkin of bush being a dictator....there's no need to vote....we proved that after he won the first time..
 

budman226

Well-Known Member
man thats fuckin crazy im moving to some small island in the carribean away from all this political bullshit! bush is slowly chiseling away at the foundation that this great country was founded on, if congress wont stand up to him they might aswell take the constitution wad it up and let bush wipe his ass with it cuz really it seems thats all its good for at this point if he can just get around it that easily. man i tell you what jan 09 can NOT!! get here any faster, im gonna throw a big ass party the day his ass is out of office, im not even sure if im aloud to say all of this anymore prolly gonna have someone at my door tomorrow carting me off to jail! lol.
 

Gygax1974

Just some idiot
What happened to all the checks and balances? I'm not really sure if I agree but that's what is great about this country I can say something and you can say something...the freedom to express yourself. Where can I find more on Lincoln and the changes he put in during the Civil War, I tried a search but there are like a bazillion pages? It's been a while since high school for me. Also IMHO I believe that you are right freedom costs something, but our president and his admin. are the ones causing this lack of "freedom" not like the civil war. To me us in Iraq and The American Civil War are just not comparable, but like I said what do I know.
 

AzGrOw-N-sMoKe

New Member
its not the goverment..its the oil corps an the american people lack of wanting to use alternate fuel sources or better gas miliage...those are the true takers of freedom..
 

the.fatman.cometh

Well-Known Member
I can sum this up.............................



Fuck George W Bush- at this point, somebody should take him out(cheney too) FUCK BUSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
Now, I shall blaze....
 

suicidesamurai

Well-Known Member
[Ed. Note: The United States government actively seeks to find, and silence, any and all opinions about the United States except those coming from authorized government and/or affiliated sources, of which we are not one. No interviews are granted and very little personal information is given about our contributors, or their sources, to protect their safety.]
I just thought this was funny. Isn't rense.com a conspiracy website?

What's it say, you ask? The White House will decide if you are in any way "undermining efforts" in Iraq, or related to Iraq or pretty much anything else, the Treasury Department is authorized to seize your money, property, stocks, etc
They do this in California. If you have a safe deposit box that you don't visit for 3 years, they (the state government) raid it. People have had hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars looted. If you have stocks, bonds, etc. they will get cash for it. In one case these people had about a million dollars in that stuff and the government got 100-200K for it. The people only got it back after complaining incessantly, but not all of it. You only get back what the government sold/traded it for, so they got back the 100-200K and were shit out of luck for the rest. They are making about a half billion dollars a year off this scheme.
 

ViRedd

New Member
You guyz are nutz! Did you read the document before making your comments? This isn't about simple protests or demonstrating peaceably in the streets. It's about using violence and abetting the enemy.

What the fuck?? :confused: ... Get a life!

Vi
 

suicidesamurai

Well-Known Member
You guyz are nutz! Did you read the document before making your comments? This isn't about simple protests or demonstrating peaceably in the streets. It's about using violence and abetting the enemy.

What the fuck?? :confused: ... Get a life!

Vi
I didn't read the whole thing but I didn't see anything about breaking up war protests and such. I googled it and couldn't find anything else, the only source being rense.com which is of course a conspiracy website.
 

ViRedd

New Member
Suicide ...

Here's the executive order:


By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)(IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)(NEA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that, due to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by acts of violence threatening the peace and stability of Iraq and undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq and to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, it is in the interests of the United States to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004. I hereby order:
Section 1. (a) Except to the extent provided in section 203(b)(1), (3), and (4) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1), (3), and (4)), or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order, all property and interests in property of the following persons, that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of United States persons, are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense,
(i) to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of:
(A) threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq; or
(B) undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people;
(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of, such an act or acts of violence or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.
(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section include, but are not limited to, (i) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order, and (ii) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.
Sec. 2. (a) Any transaction by a United States person or within the United States that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
Sec. 3. For purposes of this order:
(a) the term "person" means an individual or entity;
(b) the term "entity" means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and
(c) the term "United States person" means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.
Sec. 5. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that, because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1(a) of this order.
Sec. 6. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States Government, consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order and, where appropriate, to advise the Secretary of the Treasury in a timely manner of the measures taken.
Sec. 7. Nothing in this order is intended to affect the continued effectiveness of any rules, regulations, orders, licenses, or other forms of administrative action issued, taken, or continued in effect heretofore or hereafter under 31 C.F.R. chapter V, except as expressly terminated, modified, or suspended by or pursuant to this order.
Sec. 8. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right, benefit, or privilege, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers or employees, or any other person.
GEORGE W. BUSH
THE WHITE HOUSE, July 17, 2007.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
*LOL* another clear example of delusional lefties seeing Bush bogeymen under every bed!....*lol*......GWB is bye bye in 18 months...I think a psychological "exit strategy" will need to be implemented in order to prevent leftie cranial implosions!
Thanks Vi!
 
Top