Is the Earth growing?
- Thread starter We TaRdED
- Start date
TetraHyC
Well-Known Member
Found some more goodies.
Solar radiation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Its the outer surface of the atmosphere, best I could find.
Ball park fig. 1.74*10^17 (+-)3.5% thats watts, I converted it to Joules on my TI-89, 6.264*10^20 J
E=mc2 Explained
Says C=3.0*10^8Sq mps. = 9.0*10^16Mps
Plugged them in, 6960kg. No time factor in the equation.
Used the solve feature on the 89.
Solar radiation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Its the outer surface of the atmosphere, best I could find.
Ball park fig. 1.74*10^17 (+-)3.5% thats watts, I converted it to Joules on my TI-89, 6.264*10^20 J
E=mc2 Explained
Says C=3.0*10^8Sq mps. = 9.0*10^16Mps
Plugged them in, 6960kg. No time factor in the equation.
Used the solve feature on the 89.
TetraHyC
Well-Known Member
And after that the black holes will evaporate, and there will be nothing.
Hawking radiation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stephen Hawking is my hero.
joepro
Well-Known Member
.
The universe/all universes have a black hole in the center, therefore black holes are the alpha omega alpha????
email468
Well-Known Member
You guys are cool, it seems that some people have been getting a little testy of late
.
E-mail, I love that quote Cee has in his sig., should be RIUs matra
Cee is cool too, I made a smart ass reply in one of his threads(wasn't being mean) he thought it was funny.
i can get a little testy. i'm betting if you would care enough (and heaven help you if you do) you'd find my morning posts are more sharp and severe than my posts after say... 4:20!
medicineman
New Member
Still no proof that Black holes exist???i can get a little testy. i'm betting if you would care enough (and heaven help you if you do) you'd find my morning posts are more sharp and severe than my posts after say... 4:20!
email468
Well-Known Member
who said that?
We TaRdED
Well-Known Member
One point I would like to make before I forget(Its Friday.... I just smoked a blunt with my friends)
Email(I think it was email... I don't feel like checking it out because I'm soo stoned) said that the earth is wider towards the equators and its thinner at the poles. If my argument holds true, than thats the reason for it!!!!! The reason because the equator(of the earth) is wider than the north and south poles is because the equator turns more of the suns energy into mass!!!!
I feel like I should win the Nobel prize!! I really think I might be onto something! I am a genius!!! .................................................
Or I'm a fool for thinking I'm a genius........... It has to be one or the other!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHA...
My weed is killer!! I'm so wrecked right now!!!
(Anyone want to hire me for a science team or something?)
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
)Email(I think it was email... I don't feel like checking it out because I'm soo stoned) said that the earth is wider towards the equators and its thinner at the poles. If my argument holds true, than thats the reason for it!!!!! The reason because the equator(of the earth) is wider than the north and south poles is because the equator turns more of the suns energy into mass!!!!
I feel like I should win the Nobel prize!! I really think I might be onto something! I am a genius!!! .................................................
Or I'm a fool for thinking I'm a genius........... It has to be one or the other!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHA...
My weed is killer!! I'm so wrecked right now!!!(Anyone want to hire me for a science team or something?)
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
Last edited:
email468
Well-Known Member
One point I would like to make before I forget(Its Friday.... I just smoked a blunt with my friends
Email(I think it was email... I don't feel like checking it out because I'm soo stoned) said that the earth is wider towards the equators and its thinner at the poles. If my argument holds true, than thats the reason for it!!!!! The reason because the equator(of the earth) is wider than the north and south poles is because the equator turns more of the suns energy into mass!!!!
I feel like I should win the Nobel prize!! I really think I might be onto something! I am a genius!!! .................................................
Or I'm a fool for thinking I'm a genius........... It has to be one or the other!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHA...
(Anyone want to hire me for a science team or something?)
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
The truth of the matter is - we don't really know why! There's some theories but it's a mystery... cool, huh?
We TaRdED
Well-Known Member
Very interesting ideas. I don't know if you're wrong or not - but as I enjoy playing devil's advocate - i will probe at what i perceive as the weak spots in what you're saying... just for fun though since i really don't know if our premises are correct. So i am speculating along with you.
But first i would like to mention that we know (by measurement) that the diameter of the Earth is increasing at the equator - like many people, the Earth has a bulge around the middle which is getting larger. You can investigate why this is but it will boil down to conflicting gravitational pulls (Earth/Moon and mostly the Sun).
But this is different that the claim the Earth is expanding like a balloon being blown up as the Earth expansionists seem to be implying.
Anyway back to the infamous E=mc2. Nothing like bringing some Einstein into it
All equivalent:
E=mc2
m=E/c2
c2=E/m
And there is little doubt that the Sun is bombarding the Earth with visible and other forms of light/energy. So I think what the Earth expansionists are wondering is where does all this energy go? Much of it is of course reflected off the Earth's surface and back into space - but that would still leave a great deal of energy being received by the Earth, right?
Well i would say our moderate climate is the answer to where the majority of the energy goes. The energy is not lost but remains in the form of heat. Heating of the interior of the Earth which keeps are oceans relatively warm which keeps our climate hospitable (with the aid of our atmosphere which keeps just enough of the good energy in).
Luckily we have a few other planets to look at to see what is happening on other worlds. None seem to be expanding and they are also being bombarded by the Sun's energy. Little Mercury and mysterious Venus are even closer to the Sun and they do not seem to be getting larger. Nor does Mars - which is further away.
And if you think the Earth would expand because of energy - then for sure the gas giant planets like Jupiter and Saturn would be even more prone to expansion since gas takes very little energy to begin expanding (which is why they are so large in the first place) and yet they do not seem to be expanding either.
I'm sure if you did some digging around you could find out how much energy the Earth absorbs from Sun annually - at least a ballpark figure anyway.
anyway - just some off-the-cuff ideas that i think are related to what you're saying.
Its pretty funny. I actually posted my last post before I read this one!
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
We TaRdED
Well-Known Member
Email, I know your more of a science nut that I am. Has anyone came up with the theory I just proposed? It makes perfect sense to me, but I'm not a physicist, geologist, or scientist(for that matter) but I have learned a little bit about the subjects when I was in school.
So, has anyone claimed/postulated this idea? I bet I am correct! It would be nice if someone could pay me to do this for a career. I really enjoy this stuff.
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
So, has anyone claimed/postulated this idea? I bet I am correct! It would be nice if someone could pay me to do this for a career. I really enjoy this stuff.
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
Last edited:
We TaRdED
Well-Known Member
No, its not cool!! I know I'm right! I swear to God I should be a scientist! I bet a million bucks this will be in the "Popular Science" magizine within six months from now!
I'm so disappointed
I wish I had moneyEdit- Sorry guys I'm kind of excited!
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
Last edited:
TetraHyC
Well-Known Member
One of the ways they can tell they exist is by gravitational lensing.
Gravitational lens - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Its not really a hole, there is a body there of infinite density. Escape velocity is what you need to get away from a object, escape velocity is determend by the mass, so if the mass is big enough not even light has enough velocity to escape.
Escape velocity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Check out the list of escape velocity. As mass rises so does escape velocity.
Are you Native ?? I am Athabaskan Indian 3/8.
TetraHyC
Well-Known Member
We TaRdED
Well-Known Member
Maybe, my theory should be added to that. I wonder what I should name it? Its definitely not going to be "wetardeds' theory", I would use something better(I'll keep it a secret for now) and use my real name to take the credit.
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
email468
Well-Known Member
Bingo! I'm sorry - i was playing dumb (not very hard for me) - if you look at my post above i already kind of spilled the beans (I bolded the important bit):
but WT was full on getting into scientist mode and i was very impressed with his out of the box thinking.
We TaRdED
Well-Known Member
but WT was full on getting into scientist mode and i was very impressed with his out of the box thinking.
Naw man, I discovered something. Watch, time will tell that I'm right. It just sucks I'm going to have to say "ya, I thought of that first. I swear." HAHA *sigh*
So email, you haven't told me if you think its possible. But knowing you, you will just say "Its not possible" because you have not read it in a science book or wherever. But shoot with your response anyways.
Edit- it is very logical and most likely plausible. Occam's Razor.
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
Last edited:
Similar threads
