I've Put Uncle Buck On The "IGNORE"..

lahadaextranjera

lahadaextranjera

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
You already denied you asked the mod to delete it, now you try to pretend you don't know they deleted it? Tell us again how smart you are, what with all the "proper English" and double negatives and all.
Click to expand...
Oh look guys! It's my turn again! Lmfao over here!

Double negatives, moi? Double entendre perhaps but alas you shall not find improper use of my grammar and you truly know this which is why I'm getting 'special attention'!

Very sweet of you to think I'd be so sensitive as to ask a mod to delete a post. Where did I deny this? Especially when it reflects your misogynistic views. I'd prefer everyone to see! :)

You're going to have to try harder than that with me. I'm running (grammar) circles around you just like everyone else is! You are a twit! :)
 
Singlemalt

Singlemalt

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
yes, and i will give you all the ammo you need. what'll it be? racism, misogyny, homophobia, islamaphobia, genocide, bible thumping? i've got it all from red.

oh, and his entire family perished due to his negligence...twice. in case you want to go all morbid.
Click to expand...
I'd love to hear the story on the negligence, two separate families or did he kill them twice?
 
overgrowem

overgrowem

Well-Known Member
What gives, in reds eyes some of you rate being called racists,gay,liars cheats,pedophiles animal husbands. etc. I take good shots but In Red's world rate no more than being called "picky about grammar". I protest vigorously.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Singlemalt said:
I'd love to hear the story on the negligence, two separate families or did he kill them twice?
Click to expand...
two separate families. i won't get into much detail besides careless smoking around infants combined with no fire alarms or smoke detectors, which he claims did not really exist in 1982.

i can send you some links if you want more.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
lahadaextranjera said:
Oh look guys! It's my turn again! Lmfao over here!

Double negatives, moi? Double entendre perhaps but alas you shall not find improper use of my grammar and you truly know this which is why I'm getting 'special attention'!

Very sweet of you to think I'd be so sensitive as to ask a mod to delete a post. Where did I deny this? Especially when it reflects your misogynistic views. I'd prefer everyone to see! :)

You're going to have to try harder than that with me. I'm running (grammar) circles around you just like everyone else is! You are a twit! :)
Click to expand...
That's not the reason you get "special attention". Still think your better than others because you went to school in England? Disliking you doesn't make one a misogynist. The black girls in your neighborhood feel the same way about you. Are they misogynist? Before you start to argue, my claim that they don't go to your school because they don't want to be near you is just as valid as your claim that they are either stupid or the headmaster is a racist, because there is no other explanation. It couldn't be that they just didn't apply for finacial, peer pressure, better schools elsewhere, or distance could it? Nope, must be racism. You complained I used a double negative. Even went begging for someone to back you up on it. Now you're trying to pretend it was somehow a "witticism" that you posted. But you are correct, you are running in circles.
overgrowem said:
What gives, in reds eyes some of you rate being called racists,gay,liars cheats,pedophiles animal husbands. etc. I take good shots but In Red's world rate no more than being called "picky about grammar". I protest vigorously.
Click to expand...
You give yourself entirely too much credit. Your whole argument was that you think you have better grammer, so you must be correct in assuming the headmaster was a racist or the black girls were stupid. That's not a "good point", that's elitism.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
yes, and i will give you all the ammo you need. what'll it be? racism, misogyny, homophobia, islamaphobia, genocide, bible thumping? i've got it all from red.

oh, and his entire family perished due to his negligence...twice. in case you want to go all morbid.
Click to expand...
Homophobia? I'm surprised. I figured him for gay-as-can-be. If he wasn't such an asshole I would have set him up with some people.
 
overgrowem

overgrowem

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
That's not the reason you get "special attention". Still think your better than others because you went to school in England? Disliking you doesn't make one a misogynist. The black girls in your neighborhood feel the same way about you. Are they misogynist? Before you start to argue, my claim that they don't go to your school because they don't want to be near you is just as valid as your claim that they are either stupid or the headmaster is a racist, because there is no other explanation. It couldn't be that they just didn't apply for finacial, peer pressure, better schools elsewhere, or distance could it? Nope, must be racism. You complained I used a double negative. Even went begging for someone to back you up on it. Now you're trying to pretend it was somehow a "witticism" that you posted. But you are correct, you are running in circles.

You give yourself entirely too much credit. Your whole argument was that you think you have better grammer, so you must be correct in assuming the headmaster was a racist or the black girls were stupid. That's not a "good point", that's elitism.
Click to expand...
I do not think I have better grammar I try to use better grammar BIG diff. the rest of UR post is fantasy..
 
Singlemalt

Singlemalt

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
two separate families. i won't get into much detail besides careless smoking around infants combined with no fire alarms or smoke detectors, which he claims did not really exist in 1982.

i can send you some links if you want more.
Click to expand...
Odd, home fire and smoke detectors were invented in 1955 Jones, Hilton Ira (April 1955). "Peeps at Things to Come". The Rotarian (Rotary International) 86 (4).


From Wiki: "
Ionisation smoke detectors were first placed on the market in the United States in 1951 and were used only in major commercial and industrial facilities in the next several years due to their high expense and large size.[50] In 1955, simple home "fire detectors" for homes were invented.[51] They detected high temperatures as the fire cue.[45] The United States Atomic Energy Commission (USAEC) granted the first license to distribute smoke detectors using radioactive material in 1963.[46] The first truly affordable home smoke detector was invented by Duane D. Pearsall in 1965, featuring an individual battery powered unit that could be easily installed and replaced.[52] These first units, dubbed "SmokeGard 700,"[53] were made from strong fire resistant steel and shaped much like bee hives.[1] The company began mass producing these units in 1975.[49] Studies in the 1960s determined that smoke detectors respond to fires much faster than heat detectors.[45]

The first single-station smoke detector was invented in 1970 and made public the next year.[45] It was an ionisation detector powered by a single 9-volt battery.[45] They cost about $125 and sold at a rate of a few hundred thousand per year.[50] Several technological developments occurred between 1971 and 1976, including the replacement of cold-cathode tubes with solid-state circuitry, which greatly reduced the detectors' sizes and made it possible to monitor both the decrease in voltage and the build-up of internal resistance in the battery.[50] The previous alarm horns, which required specialty batteries were replaced with horns that were more energy-efficient, enabling the use of commonly available sizes of batteries.[50] These detectors could also function with smaller amounts of radioactive source material, and the sensing chamber and smoke detector enclosure were redesigned for more effective operation.[50] The rechargeable batteries were also replaced with a pair of AA batteries along with a plastic shell encasing the detector. The 10-year-lithium-battery-powered smoke alarm was invented in 1995.[45]"
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
overgrowem said:
I do not think I have better grammar I try to use better grammar BIG diff. the rest of UR post is fantasy..
Click to expand...
You clearly stated you have better grammer. So, you're lying. You tried to pretend that qualified you to decide that there were only two possible explanations. Denying your own statements doesn't mean I'm fantasizing, it just means you're dishonest.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Singlemalt said:
Odd, home fire and smoke detectors were invented in 1955 Jones, Hilton Ira (April 1955). "Peeps at Things to Come". The Rotarian (Rotary International) 86 (4).


From Wiki: "
Ionisation smoke detectors were first placed on the market in the United States in 1951 and were used only in major commercial and industrial facilities in the next several years due to their high expense and large size.[50] In 1955, simple home "fire detectors" for homes were invented.[51] They detected high temperatures as the fire cue.[45] The United States Atomic Energy Commission (USAEC) granted the first license to distribute smoke detectors using radioactive material in 1963.[46] The first truly affordable home smoke detector was invented by Duane D. Pearsall in 1965, featuring an individual battery powered unit that could be easily installed and replaced.[52] These first units, dubbed "SmokeGard 700,"[53] were made from strong fire resistant steel and shaped much like bee hives.[1] The company began mass producing these units in 1975.[49] Studies in the 1960s determined that smoke detectors respond to fires much faster than heat detectors.[45]

The first single-station smoke detector was invented in 1970 and made public the next year.[45] It was an ionisation detector powered by a single 9-volt battery.[45] They cost about $125 and sold at a rate of a few hundred thousand per year.[50] Several technological developments occurred between 1971 and 1976, including the replacement of cold-cathode tubes with solid-state circuitry, which greatly reduced the detectors' sizes and made it possible to monitor both the decrease in voltage and the build-up of internal resistance in the battery.[50] The previous alarm horns, which required specialty batteries were replaced with horns that were more energy-efficient, enabling the use of commonly available sizes of batteries.[50] These detectors could also function with smaller amounts of radioactive source material, and the sensing chamber and smoke detector enclosure were redesigned for more effective operation.[50] The rechargeable batteries were also replaced with a pair of AA batteries along with a plastic shell encasing the detector. The 10-year-lithium-battery-powered smoke alarm was invented in 1995.[45]"
Click to expand...
Nice history lesson. What is the point?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top