January 6th hearings on Trump's failed insurrection.

Budzbuddha

Budzbuddha

Well-Known Member
Ganjihad said:
No. We dont spend so.much on a military budget to drone strike children, then cover it up like biden. This isn't an either or proposition. BushView attachment 5064319 was a fucking idiot.

Hell, Obama personally gave the go ahead on all his drone strikes. He literally killed hundreds of innocent children, but somehow that lying fuck portrayed himself as a civil rights champion.
Click to expand...
Hey retard …. Nice try .

Photo is from 1983 - you idiot. Same ol’ political crybabies trying to seed more confusion. Did you try to fact check “ a meme “ ?

Of Course not. Reverse search really isnt that hard .
SCRAM

C97C857C-5738-4CD6-94B8-633B782ED4CA.jpeg
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Ganjihad said:
No. We dont spend so.much on a military budget to drone strike children, then cover it up like biden. This isn't an either or proposition. BushView attachment 5064319 was a fucking idiot.

Hell, Obama personally gave the go ahead on all his drone strikes. He literally killed hundreds of innocent children, but somehow that lying fuck portrayed himself as a civil rights champion.
Click to expand...
I realize you are trying to influence by appealing to emotion so I guess it doesn't matter if the meme contains a photo was taken long before there were drones and Biden was still wet behind the ears as a relatively new congressman.
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
rkymtnman said:
i thought i read the other day that Biden has appointed more federal judges than trump had done at this point? i can't find my source though but that's pretty cool.
Click to expand...
Yeah it is basically Biden dunking on Trump's only real talking point.
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-bill-clinton-race-and-ethnicity-voting-rights-district-of-columbia-80830dd1e0687173a0d3927952ed4a8b
Screen Shot 2022-01-10 at 6.42.22 PM.png
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden on Thursday made two final nominations to the federal bench this year as he caps his first year in office with 40 judges confirmed, the most since Ronald Reagan was president.

Nancy Gbana Abudu, his nominee for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in the deep South, would be the first Black woman to sit on that court. The circuit covers Alabama, Georgia and Florida, where 8.5 million people are Black yet there is only one Black judge on the 12-person panel, Charles Wilson, and he was nominated by former President Bill Clinton.

The second nominee, also a woman of color, is J. Michelle Childs, currently a U.S. District Court judge for South Carolina. She is nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Former GOP president Donald Trump and then-Senate Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky oushed through a flurry of federal judges and three Supreme Court justices who will shape the courts for a generation.

Biden and the Democrats are working to counter with a rapid number of diverse nominations and confirmations. But that is stoking fears of the politicization of the judiciary, something judges roundly reject as they affirm their ability to be fair and impartial.

Abudu currently serves as the deputy legal director for strategic litigation at the Southern Poverty Law Center and was at the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida before that and also worked at the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project. She graduated from Tulane University law school in 1999.

CAPITOL SIEGE: ONE YEAR LATER
Her deep experience in voting rights will be extremely relevant, White House officials and advocates say, especially considering the increasing challenges facing voters this year following a series of GOP-led restrictions. She would also be the first judge of color to sit on the court from Georgia, a state that was among the most critically watched during the 2020 elections.

“This is an extraordinary appointment,” said Leslie Proll, senior adviser on judicial nominations for NAACP. “Nancy Abudu’s nomination addresses a breathtaking gap in representation on this Southern appellate bench. Her substantial voting rights expertise will be a welcome addition to this court, which has an outsized voting rights docket and is pivotal to protecting our democracy.”

Childs has been on the bench in South Carolina since 2010, appointed by former President Barack Obama. She received her master’s in Judicial Studies from Duke University School of Law in 2016. She got her law degree from the University of South Carolina School of Law.

With these two, Biden has now nominated 75 federal judges. Of the 40 confirmed so far, 80% are women, with 53% being people of color, according to the White House.

The U.S. Senate must confirm the nominations. But with no Supreme Court opening to slow them, Biden and Senate Democrats are putting judges on federal trial and appellate courts at a much faster clip than any of Biden’s recent predecessors, Trump included.

The Senate confirmed 18 circuit and district court judges in Trump’s first year in office, and 12 in Obama’s inaugural year.

Obama and Clinton, the last two Democratic presidents, were slow to move judicial nominations. But they both had early, time-consuming Supreme Court vacancies to deal with.
Click to expand...

I thought this was pretty interesting too:
Screen Shot 2022-01-10 at 6.41.38 PM.png

Looks like Biden got 32 judges nominated while the news was shitting all over his agenda with their constant negativity.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
The 1/6 Committee Needs To ‘Use Every Tool At Their Disposal’ Says Peter Strzok

Former FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, Washington Post congressional correspondent Jackie Alemany, and “Washington Week” moderator Yamiche Alcindor discuss the standoffs brewing between the Jan. 6 committee and "Trump world" that could determine the probe’s next steps.
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
OG-KGP said:
Well, somebody did. I assumed it was you. Sure the video was uncomfortable to watch, but I guess that was the point. To open eyes to not normal behavior. Not to make excuses just because somebody else did worse which was all I was hearing. Peace out.
Click to expand...
Yeah cherry picked edited propaganda that far right hate mongers put together about children usually is uncomfortable to watch.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Jim Jordan Refuses to Testify/Incriminate Trump: Here's How it Will Come Back to Bite Him

Representative Jim Jordan released a four-page letter indicating he will not cooperate with the House select committee's investigation into the insurrection. In other words, he will not provide information about Donald Trump's conduct, including potentially incriminating information, regarding the insurrection. Here is a review of some of what Jordan put in his letter and how some of his assertions will prove problematic if not outright incriminating in the future.
 
Wattzzup

Wattzzup

Well-Known Member
OG-KGP said:
Well, somebody did. I assumed it was you. Sure the video was uncomfortable to watch, but I guess that was the point. To open eyes to not normal behavior. Not to make excuses just because somebody else did worse which was all I was hearing. Peace out.
Click to expand...
Didn’t our last president want to “open eyes”

see how that worked out. Every president kills kids. Move on to something else.
 
Dorian2

Dorian2

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
New propaganda spam troll: 'Biden is a racist', oh and a pedophile based on right wing cherry picked propaganda click bait!

Meanwhile back in reality, Biden's cabinet:View attachment 5064353
Click to expand...
On a side note...Avril Haines caught my eye and I'd never heard of her so I just read about her on Wiki.

Smart Cookie holding a big ol' can of worms there!! Best read I've had about an American Lifer Politician. She's the same age as me so it was easy to follow the timeline to present.

Just an observation. Lots of Fodder for both sides here. ;)
 
Herb & Suds

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED said:
Jim Jordan Refuses to Testify/Incriminate Trump: Here's How it Will Come Back to Bite Him

Representative Jim Jordan released a four-page letter indicating he will not cooperate with the House select committee's investigation into the insurrection. In other words, he will not provide information about Donald Trump's conduct, including potentially incriminating information, regarding the insurrection. Here is a review of some of what Jordan put in his letter and how some of his assertions will prove problematic if not outright incriminating in the future.
Click to expand...
BENGHAZI!:finger:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top