Jobs Report A Sign Of Things To Come

mame

Well-Known Member
As long as the government continues cutting jobs and expenditures (Austerity! yay!) in the face of high unemployment the economic recovery will continue to slow and could possibly contract, as austerity is proven to be capable of in this kind of situation. More government spending, NOT less is what we need right now; direct government spending via infrastructure is preferred but really anything that boosts aggregiate demand is what policy discussions should be focused on right now.

The wonders of Austerity:


And here’s government purchases of goods and services (so it doesn’t count transfer payments like unemployment insurance):

Unemployment:


So contractionary policy is contractionary, afterall?
 

beardo

Well-Known Member
I'm so excited their talking about economic stimulis and bail outs and quanitive easing and raising the debt celing, I hope they do because I'm poor and need some money.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
As long as the government continues cutting jobs and expenditures (Austerity! yay!) in the face of high unemployment the economic recovery will continue to slow and could possibly contract, as austerity is proven to be capable of in this kind of situation. More government spending, NOT less is what we need right now; direct government spending via infrastructure is preferred but really anything that boosts aggregiate demand is what policy discussions should be focused on right now.

The wonders of Austerity:


And here’s government purchases of goods and services (so it doesn’t count transfer payments like unemployment insurance):

Unemployment:


So contractionary policy is contractionary, afterall.
Your charts only emphasize the failure of the stimulus.

All it did was put off the inevitable and in the process reward Democratic constituencies - temporarily.

We have not seen austerity, yet. Wasteful government deficit spending is robust.

But we must have austerity measures enacted soon or America fails.

Either way it happens, a crash will ultimately be a cleansing event.

Frankly, I am not so alarmed by the specter of a failure to raise the debt limit.

As I understand it; by law, the interest payments are first in line so we will not default.

It's everything behind servicing the debt which will have to scramble for the crumbs.
 

mame

Well-Known Member
The debt limit is arguably unconstitutional anyway, but besides that...

How do you figure Austerity must happen soon (it's already happening, although not as grand of a scale as what will happen soon)? You realize interest rates are at historic lows, right? Whats's wrong with spending in the short term (infrastructure, not tax cuts and state level budget relief) to get people working again? I'll repeat, what makes you beleive austerity must happen now as opposed to after we have full employment?
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
The debt limit is arguably unconstitutional anyway, but besides that...

How do you figure Austerity must happen soon (it's already happening, although not as grand of a scale as what will happen soon)?
Austerity has most certainly not happened at all. Otherwise spending would equal revenues.

The Stimulus failed and there is no mood for another one. But the absence of a failed stimulus is NOT austerity.

You realize interest rates are at historic lows, right?
Of course I do. But it's artificial and cannot be maintained for long. Soon those rates will rise dramatically.

Whats's wrong with spending in the short term (infrastructure, not tax cuts and state level budget relief) to get people working again?
Umm, it does not work.

The Stimulus proved as much.

As soon as the government money runs out, the jobs go with it because the economy has been prevented from going through its natural cycles.

How much was spent per stimulus job? It broke down to something like $278,000 per job.

And it did not even work.

How can you justify that?

I'll repeat, what makes you beleive austerity must happen now as opposed to after we have full employment?
Actually, that's a different question. The answer is nobody thinks about austerity when times are good.

But times will not be good again until we go through some very rough times.

When the revenues are flowing in, the government spends more.

Now, when times are bad the government spends more.

Because the natural inclination for government is to grow: Ever larger and more powerful.

The only way government will reign back the spending is either a revolution at the polls, or if the state of the economy forces it on them.
 

sen.c

Active Member
Another proof positive that government can't run crap.........
Useless spending, entitlement to those who don't deserve it but lets make sure we get a raise regardless of the economic situation and raise taxes, yeah that will do it.

There are three boxes the people of this country need to use, and below is the order in which it should be used.
1. Soap Box
2. Ballot Box
3. Ammo Box
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
But Mame, I thought you said that the economy was recovering? Are you saying that perhaps you were too quick to judge the data you were being fed?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
as i have said before, this will be a 'lost decade'. this jobs report of minimal growth will be followed by similar ones for a long while, no matter who is in office.

i will get around to disputing with johnnyo on his usual bullshit (:razz:), but now i must rest. tired as shit after pulling weeds all day. and not the good kind.
 

mame

Well-Known Member
Austerity has most certainly not happened at all. Otherwise spending would equal revenues.
Government budget cuts at state aand local levels have already been under way, in the last year the government has shed at least 500,000 jobs; Cmon man, it's been happening already and the big compromise package will only make things worse.

The Stimulus failed and there is no mood for another one. But the absence of a failed stimulus is NOT austerity.
It didn't fail, it just wasn't big enough and arguably was made up of the wrong kind of spending (it was essentially a bailout for the states and 40% taxes where as infrastructure and mortgage debt relief would have been more effective). but it didn't fail... If it had failed things would be worse off than if there was no fiscal stimulus; The CBO estimated 3 million jobs were created/saved by the stimulus and most economists - whether they agree with the estimate or not - agree that it helped more than hurt.


Of course I do. But it's artificial and cannot be maintained for long. Soon those rates will rise dramatically.
WSJ and the like have been making this same argument for a couple of years now, just so you know; A couple of years ago they thought our interest rates would have already gone up. This hasn't happened yet, despite the fact that predictions have repeatedly come and gone and interest rates have remained low. The bond vigilantes are not coming, give up; We are not Greece.

Greece is facing high interest rates, as conservatives predict will happen to the U.S. but Greece is a small economy, that does not export much and does not have it's own currency. U.S. treasury bonds are considered one of the safest investments in the world are they not? They will continue to be for the forseeable future, interest rates will not go up as long the economy remains depressed - this is a symptom of the liquidity trap.

Greece debt levels compared to US debt levels(partially projections 2012-2016):

As I said before, people have been warning about the bond vigilantes to no avail for some time - Bill Gross recently made the prediction:

Keep predicting, and you'll keep on being wrong.



Umm, it does not work.

The Stimulus proved as much.

As soon as the government money runs out, the jobs go with it because the economy has been prevented from going through its natural cycles.

How much was spent per stimulus job? It broke down to something like $278,000 per job.

And it did not even work.

How can you justify that?
It was better than nothing, as I said. We are on a fiat currency the economy does not need to go through "cycles" as if we were on the gold standard. We can have sustained growth without significant contraction... "The Great Moderation".


Actually, that's a different question. The answer is nobody thinks about austerity when times are good.

But times will not be good again until we go through some very rough times.

When the revenues are flowing in, the government spends more.

Now, when times are bad the government spends more.

Because the natural inclination for government is to grow: Ever larger and more powerful.

The only way government will reign back the spending is either a revolution at the polls, or if the state of the economy forces it on them.
You do not need to sacrifice at an alter to get the economy moving again. Infrastructure is not about increasing the size of government at all; All across our nation our roads, sewers, trains, etc are all far behind and/or crumbling in disrepair... Infrastructure investment can help the economy in the short term and we can live through long term austerity once the economy is at or near full employment, which it is not ATM.
But Mame, I thought you said that the economy was recovering? Are you saying that perhaps you were too quick to judge the data you were being fed?
I've said like 50 times the stimulus wasn't big enough, now you have guys like Krathammer (spelling?) and other moderate conservatives even arguing for infrastructure spending, don't you agree that this spending can help in the short term and provide long term benefits as well(because we would use all the shit being built)?
 

Dislexicmidget2021

Well-Known Member
O how the government weaves its tangled web,they really are screwing it up and getting pay raises while doing it....Man if i could only get a pay raise while screwing up my job.....o but id be unemployed....o wait y do we have these people in office again?
 

mame

Well-Known Member
uhm... if I remember correctly federal pay has been frozen. Also, as I already said in this thread in the last year 500,000+ government jobs have been cut.

You righties really need to let go of your blind hatred of government workers... It's really quite pathetic IMO.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
We had QE2 and it begat 9.2% official unemployment, QE3 will bring us 9.4% official and 35% unofficial. Then they will go after 401K's and IRA's. The federal pension system will have been bled dry.
 

Charlie Ventura

Active Member
Government spending is capital destruction, and as we libertarian/conservatives know, the Progressives are hell bent on destroying as much capital as possible. With this in mind, what the hell, let's create teaspoon ready jobs instead of shovel ready jobs. I figure it would take 300 people with teaspoons digging to equal one person digging with a shovel. So see, right there we can create 300 times the jobs with all that stimulus money! Oops, I forgot the boon this would be to those evil, rich, teaspoon company corporate fat-cats. Can't have that, now can we. What to do ... what to do??
 

sen.c

Active Member
Mame, there are lies, damn lies and then there are statistics take it how you will. I tell you what, nothing is going to change until they put term limits on all forms of public officials. When they leave office, there pay stops and they get in the same lines as we do. They do not deserve their pay for the rest of their life along with their golden private insurance because of "service to their country." They are people just like us. You are barking up the wrong tree if you think your gonna put a positive spin on Obama's path of destruction he's laid to this ponit. What's scary is there are to many mindless sheep out there that will fall for this crap because they are too dumb and lazy to do research for thereselves and vote accordingly instead of drinking the kool-aid of smooth talk and voting because of race.
 

mame

Well-Known Member
If fiscal contraction is contractionary, does that not also mean that fiscal expansion is expansionary?
 

ilkhan

Well-Known Member
The more money they create the poorer you will become. = FACT
Notice soup cans lately?
Smaller then they used to be.
That is inflation.
Learn to love 40% food price increases annually.

We don't need term limits what we need is principled people with integrity and knowledge of why America WAS exceptional.
 

mame

Well-Known Member
Government spending is capital destruction, and as we libertarian/conservatives know, the Progressives are hell bent on destroying as much capital as possible. With this in mind, what the hell, let's create teaspoon ready jobs instead of shovel ready jobs. I figure it would take 300 people with teaspoons digging to equal one person digging with a shovel. So see, right there we can create 300 times the jobs with all that stimulus money! Oops, I forgot the boon this would be to those evil, rich, teaspoon company corporate fat-cats. Can't have that, now can we. What to do ... what to do??
Government spending in our current situation has very little, if any "crowding out" effects. Your example is ridiculous BTW, no one is advocating a bridge to nowhere(or in your case "teaspoon ready jobs"), in case you haven't noticed American infrastructure is in need of repair. What is wrong with government spending on much needed infrastructure at a time when interest rates are at historic lows? Unemployment is high, with over 1 million unemployed constructions workers... It really just doesn't make any sense outside of the distinct possibility that your idealogy blinds you from the facts... Unless you've got some sort of non-idealogical driven solution?
 
Top