I think you may have just said two opposing things at once there. I asked if you were against voluntary exchanges where two willing parties make an exchange, and you answered no. Then you advocated for exchanges where all of the participants may not be willing and suggested it was okay to use force for an external party to "manage" an exchange between other people. Yes, I am free to fuck off, but that doesn't explain your expressing two opposing views at once. I'm curious how far your meddling goes... Would you use force to make two of your neighbors interact if one or both had no interest in doing so ?