If you look up the info they are like 90lm/w for 95CRI, Which i don't think is great. Maybe someone more knowledgeable can explain. But how do these compare to Bridgelux 98 CRI thrive strips? Pretty sure bridgelux has 98CRI in the 130-140lm/w range.
You won't find "par maps" for these. You might find some horticulture measurements on the data sheet for the diodes themselves. Then you can multiply that PPF by the number of diodes on the strip you are looking at. Otherwise you have to go by Lumen per watt and assume a certain conversion rate to PPF based on intensity and CRI.
Thanks for clearing that up for him, I'm not very versed in the technical aspects of understanding it all fully so can't offer much beyond posting datasheets.
Man that looks awesome, thanks for sharing that. Did you piece together your supplement strips individually or did you get them produced from somewhere like cutter?
I think my point was that it was exactly the same study. The study Bugee refers to in his YouTube video is the same one I linked to but he had different conclusions when pointing out the results. IMO only one conclusion from that study can be right. Spectrum either affects yield or it doesn't. We believe it does. It is something old time growers have known since they switched from MH to HPS lamps for flowering. We've seen flowering times come down in grow rooms simply through the addition of far red with no impact on yield. We've seen increases in yields with the addition of more red and far red light. I don't think it's a coincidence that many growers have reported this over the years.
I don't like the data that we are gauging for plants in other forms other than how plants observe and utilize light. Lumens are a measure of how people observe light. Wattage is a measurement of energy needed to power the light and is not how plant needs should be measured either.
